Instructor name Date Healthcare, a Matter of Life and Death The presidential election is over with the legislative and executive branches of government maintaining the status quo. Had the Republican Party gained control of the White House and the Senate the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Obamacare, would have been repealed or at least gutted beyond recognition…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
Unpopular when first proposed and passed in 2010, the ACA has steadily gained acceptance since the Supreme Court ruling on the constitutionality of the law last June. The disagreement is between two opposing ideologies. One that believes health care should be a commodity much like any other, you buy as much as you can afford and if you cannot afford it then do without. The other thinks all citizens are entitled to the bare essentials of life including food, shelter, clothing and healthcare. Before the ACA passed and was a still a bill trying to survive in Congress, legislators and the American public were locked in a contentious national debate that further divided a nation already deeply separated by a conflicting concept regarding the country’s ideological direction. One side was frightened that “creeping socialism” was undermining the “American ideal.” They did not want European style governance claiming that the transformation would change the foundations of the country into something unrecognizable to them. The anti healthcare faction went as far as to use groundless scare tactics such as saying Obamacare death panels would come for grandma after she became too unhealthy to justify paying for continuing care. This and other statements just as untruthful and outrageous were not found on a radical, unknown blog posts but were spoken on the Senate steps by elected representatives in front of cameras and microphones. The battle was tough even by Washington D.C. standards but was won and subsequently preserved by the Supreme Court and the November 6 election. Despite the rumors of death panels killing dear old Grandma, the AARP and AMA along with nearly every person or organization involved with health care delivery supported the ACA and for good reason. The law already forbids health insurance companies from dropping coverage if a policy holder becomes ill and discriminating on the basis of pre-existing conditions and age. It allows easier access for everyone, lets children age 26and under to stay on their parent’s plan, assists with long-term care and strengthens Medicare. The law also addresses preventative care. Already, insurance companies must pay for preventative services such as diabetes screenings, mammograms and immunizations at no cost to the patient and without adding to their insurance premium. By 2014, when it is fully implemented, annual and lifetime coverage limits will be a thing of the past. This means benefits will not end when they are most needed, during a serious and costly stay in the hospital. Small businesses and middle income families will receive tax credits which will guarantee all can afford healthcare (“Fact Sheet,” 2012). Opponents to health care reform seem to favor the components of the ACA but not the law as a whole. They fear the level of care will decline providing compelling evidence to back up their claim. “Fewer than 700,000 physicians would be available to treat a patient population growing in size, aging in years, shunning medical education and receiving ‘free’ health care or insurance coverage from the government in increasing numbers.” (“Doctor Shortage,”
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Argument essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1462060-argument-essay
(Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1462060-argument-essay.
Understanding what these differences are and associating this with the concepts of management and leadership also create a different understanding and response to given situations. A theory which creates a different response is contingency theory, which uses specific situations and responses for motivation.
In author’s context, there are significant changes in his mode of writing from the controversy analysis to public arguments. Actually, he had to make relevant adjustments to enable me address different audience, purpose, message, and context. Notably, these variables were distinct in any of my assignments.
An increase in the aged population results in the growth of more commercial activities in the country thus the claim that such a demographic tilt will represent more of an opportunity than a threat to businesses in the United Kingdom. One of the key factors that results in an improved quality of life is health policies in a country.
There is a set of rules that govern sports with the aim of ensuring fair competition and reliable adjudication process. Participants in a sport can win by scoring goals, be the first one to cross the finishing line, or following the decision of judges who determine the winner via a set of performance standards.
Often, imprisonment creates shame and this makes the situation worse. The author believes that it lead to defensive actions and not corrective behaviours. Tangney believes that shame discourages the offender to be better. While reading this article, the main question that lingered in mind is how we can discourage crime in the society?
From this point, let us take a step further and advance into a new dimension. This is the place where most words originate. It is the human mind. The mind begins in the brain. Let us for a moment think about the mind-brain relationship, and we have an idea of how powerful words can be.
This step-by-step logical approach makes Romano’s writing very convincing and easy to follow. It is almost surgically precise.
This writing has a lot to recommend to other readers. The main attraction is Romano’s balanced
The author states that in the academic audience, he dedicated his time and works to informing audience on the different controversies that exist in relation to reference topic. For example, he shared the arguments and counterarguments on increasing fuel prices with an aim of reducing global warming.