Relationships can be based on reason, self interest, or many other things, but that does not mean that love is necessarily based on any of those things – love and relationships are not necessarily connected. …
Download file to see previous pages...
Love is an emotional response, something that can interact with logic, sometimes agreeing with it, sometimes overpowering it, and sometimes falling to it, but they are inherently different things. Love is probably the most often used theme in works of fiction – it is powerful, evocative, can easily create conflict, and people care about it more than almost anything else. Shakespeare is one of the English language’s most famous playwrights largely because of his ability to depict the emotional rollercoaster that is a romantic relationship. In the story “Romeo and Juliet” Shakespeare shows the essentially illogical, emotional nature of love. This story does emotionally heighten the importance of love, both by seemingly contrasting love with death on several occasions and by artificially raising the stakes of love by making the two lovers part of rival families bent on a blood feud. “Romeo and Juliet” and “Love is a Fallacy” actually agree on the most important point about love: that it is an emotional response that is separate from reason. The stories differ, however, in their portrayal of love: in “Romeo and Juliet” love acts as an uncontrollable force, whereas love is depicted as something one can choose in “Love is a Fallacy,” and “Romeo and Juliet” displays a selfless love, while “Love is a Fallacy” depicts love as entirely driven by self-interest....
Coveting something is very different from loving something, and this contrast of love and coveting shows that love, unlike covetousness, cannot be a calculated thing. In fact, the main character does not even use the word “love” until the end of the poem, in a setting where it seems like a calculated move to try to acquire the thing he covets, Polly. Polly cleverly shows that every expression of love that the main character can possibly create is a logical fallacy of some sort – again highlighting the emotional nature of love, which falls in the face of reason. “Romeo and Juliet” also depicts love as something that is entirely emotional, because the protagonists regularly commit acts that are entirely unreasonable and in fact harmful to themselves and others because of love. Juliet, for instance, asks Romeo to “deny [his] father and refuse [his] name” in order to form a romantic relationship with her (Shakespeare, 2.2). It is entirely unreasonable to expect someone to give up their family and their whole life, but love, clearly, is not a reasonable thing – Romeo does in fact give everything up for her. Furthermore, both Romeo and Juliet commit suicide at the end of the story when they think their lover is dead, showing an almost hysterically emotional response. Clearly, love and logic are entirely separate things in both “Love is a Fallacy” and “Romeo and Juliet” Though both stories agree that love is “fallacious” in the sense that it is illogical, they disagree on how love affects one’s self. In “Love is a Fallacy” all of the characters are able to choose whom they are attracted to, whereas in
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The classic interpretation of this is as a defense of love – the demonstration of a love so pure and powerful that it cannot but be admired, and a loved that ended up being constructive, patching a longstanding feud between of the greatest houses in Verona, Italy.
The story depicts several themes that are archetypal of teenage love and thus, captivates the reader by providing the perfect blend of being close to reality yet being fantasy-like at the same time. In this essay, the story of Romeo and Juliet will be compared and contrasted to the teenage love stories witnessed in the present world.
No other word has as many meanings, applications, aspects, or sides as love does. The very simplicity of love makes it a complex perception that is beyond all human ability to comprehend. Love is one of those gifts of life that we can not describe, but we know it when we feel it.
According to the essay, in Othello, Shakespeare has moved against the conventional stereotyping of black as evil by changing the meaning of black and white in the play. Through his attempt to alter the significance of black and white colors in the play Othello, Shakespeare apparently seems to be making a political statement with respect to race.
The protagonist, Romeo talks about dreams and love at various locations and connects the two. Love in the play is depicted as a dream that does not last long and at waking up; the dreamer comes to no end. Reality only indicates that Romeo and
peare penned Romeo and Juliet in 1597 reflecting through his action and characters the traditions of England and Elizabethan values and while focusing the story on a young couple in Verona. In this way, he also integrates some of the same values that were widely understood in
Love is a feeling of affection or liking towards something or somebody. The feeling is often deep and emotional in nature, and one can go an extra mile for the sake of love. Though the definition of love is complex, the paper presents it as manifested in the social,
Though we have often acknowledged the existence of love and the encompassing nature of its might, being the ultimate good in men and that which ‘makes the world go round’, we are aware as well that love must have been sustained by elements that facilitate its
Tragedy coupled with mild humor and sarcasm about the then prevailing social behaviors reveals various underlying sociological process that were in action during those times. Shakespeare appears inclined towards promoting the idea that family values,
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The Emotional Nature of Love in Love is a Fallacy and Romeo and Juliet for FREE!