We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Collaboration and Peer Reviews - Essay Example

Comments (0)
Summary
Collaboration – Advantages, Disadvantages and Challenges In many different professional and academic environments collaboration is a necessity – one person will simply not have the abilities to complete something solely on their own, and need others to help them with their work, provide outside resources, other expertise or simply provide another point of view on work being done…
Download full paper
GRAB THE BEST PAPER

Extract of sample
Collaboration and Peer Reviews

Download file to see previous pages... There are disadvantages, however, such as sometimes having one’s ideas rejected or significantly altered before they are put on paper, and having to accommodate other people’s schedules and life. One of the major advantages to collaborating on a project is that one gets a different set of expertise that can inform the work being done. Specialization is key in w wide variety of fields, because the amount of knowledge and experience in the world is exploding at a much greater rate than someone can actually keep up with it. Thus collaborating allows someone to access knowledge and expertise they may not otherwise have, which can provide different points of view, subtlety to an argument, or even correct errors that are made in the original judgement. Another benefits of collaborating on projects is having another person to bounce ideas off of, that can be more critical than one usually is to one’s self. Sometimes other people can see errors in thinking that another person cannot, and this help protect anyone collaborating on a project from accidentally publishing things that might not be accurate when viewed critically. It is very, very difficult to be thoroughly critical about one’s own ideas, so having another person who can do that can be incredibly helpful on a variety of levels. While collaboration has a number of advantages, it also has some disadvantages. Collaborating necessarily means compromise. Sometimes people will differ on where to put emphasis, or perhaps on even more major issues such as whether or not something is an argument that they should be making. Collaborating means that sometimes each person’s ideas will be heavily edited before they get out, which can lead to somewhat less creative or outside the box thinking. Furthermore, collaborating takes a lot more time than working on something alone can – one has to accommodate their collaborator’s schedule, life and so on, so instead of just working when and how one wants, one has to sometimes wait for feedback, go over things several times and so forth. Collaboration does have some disadvantages that detract from its overall advantages. One of the things I learned through reviewing my peers work is how much easier it is to see negative things in another person’s work than one’s own. After reviewing a peer’s work, I went back and looked for those same issues in my own, and many of them were present. Furthermore, I learned that it is much easier to see what is done improperly (bad grammar, structure errors and so on) than to appreciate what is done well. One of the major advantages of having a peer review my paper was catching errors in logic or communication that I would not see. Obviously I created the ideas and arguments I use when writing a paper, so when I read it back to myself it always makes perfect sense – I know what I’m talking about. Another person, however, can only glean what your argument means from the writing you put on the page, so it can really highlight things that you have not communicated well enough, or that do not make sense without added detail. One of the disadvantages to having a peer review my work before I submit it is that sometimes having someone else review my work can ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Summary of Peer Reviews of the Protagnonsts on Frankenstein
Furthermore, how similar or different they are can result to conflicts within stories. This essay explores the thread on the peer views of the protagonists for Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. The identified protagonists in the novel are Victor, Frankenstein, and Walton.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Peer reviews lesson plans
Other than the aim of structuring the lesson plan, differences would be caused by errors and other problems encountered in writing the lesson plan. Different sections of lesson plans have varying difficulties. All the sections can hardly be conceptualized in a smooth way.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
COLLABORATION
One of the most prominent values is that through collaborative group work individuals are able to receive a variety of perspectives that challenge and strengthen one’s own understanding. Collaboration in the learning context also prepares students for
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
COLLABORATION
This is fundamentally the purpose of group work. Group work is preferred over individual work because the strengths are enhanced in the group while the weaknesses are overcome. While collaboration takes on a variety of
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Collaboration and Peer Reviews
Each team member will have their own personal views about how to complete a project, so if each person can share their thoughts with the group, a much better method can be come up with. The group can take the
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Do Peer Reviews on prewriting work for The Odyssey
ter Ulysses together with his team constantly found themselves in many instances of mysterious adventures that inflicted great sufferings, pain and death to some members of the crew. They prevalent Greek wars, attacks by Cyclops and punishment by the gods led to the death and
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Peer Reviews
This as we see, makes her to be rude to her step mother who has nothing but the best interest at heart for her stepdaughter. Yes, I am able to identify with the characters. There are two main characters in the story. The stepmother and her stepdaughter. The
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Peer Reviewed
This paper looks at the peer review process at Cancer Treatment Centers of America and the ways in which it is similar to other organizations. It then looks at ways in which it can be improved. It finally looks at the way the process
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay
Complete Research Paper Drafts and Peer Reviews
ious trends in the industry due to the internet, at a production level, books can move straight from the author to the reader with distribution been done through electronic marketplaces were e-tailers retail electronic books.This paper assumes that the impact that internet has
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Peer to Peer Lending Scheme
A facilitator is the person who has no decision-making authority, his primary role is to help the group identify and solve problems. The facilitator contributes to the structure and interaction process, and his primary role is to
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic Collaboration and Peer Reviews for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us