Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1437042-argument-essay-logging-allowed-in-rainforests-yes
https://studentshare.org/english/1437042-argument-essay-logging-allowed-in-rainforests-yes.
This essay seeks to explain why logging in the rain forests ought to ban. Chiefly, logging leads to deforestation and has some unforeseen consequences, which in effect have been detrimental to the environment. Climate change and global warming are undoubtedly the most visible impact on the environment. Continued logging has made various societies to receive unpredictable weather patterns that not only affect the agricultural patterns for many farmers but they also threaten other animal species as drought and famine has become a norm (Williams 94).
Besides, there is the need to recognize that deforestation has affected many native human societies and consequently altered their social arrangements and patterns (Hurst 28). For instance, the Kayapo tribe occupying the Amazon forests has had to adjust their social and economic organizations to adapt to the rapid deforestation that has taken root in the country. Over the years, the political institutions have used the logging debate to solicit political mileage. In particular, Williams explicates that the politicians have justified logging to increase their revenues as myriad of companies continue to receive licenses to operate in the tropical forests (79).
For example, Brazil allowed mining company to clear land in the Amazon forests, destroying numerous plant and animal species in the pretext of increasing revenues for the entire country. In addition, the government and political leaders have justified their policies on land clearance as aimed at resettling the landless (Hurst 28). This is a reflection of the nature of governments’ insensitivity to the forests and biodiversity. Perlin articulates that it is agreeable that various policies and regulations that allow for encroachment into the rain forests fail to comprehend the cross cutting issue of decreasing the biodiversity (73).
It is important to appreciate that albeit the rationale behind continued logging, the world stands to lose in decreasing numbers of species that have their habitats in the tropical rain forest. Ecologically, were the practices of logging and deforestation to continue, many plant and animal species would face extinction. This does not only destabilize the food web and chains, it may lead to an ecologically imbalance habitats that might be of little if any help in the long term. As such, logging in the tropical rain forests ought to be a buried debate in its opposition.
Further, while justifications may persist that if industries were allowed to cut down trees in the rain forests, they would ultimately help in the conservation efforts of the same. In fact, the sole motive or objective of any company is to make profit (Williams 83). As such, conservation efforts would imply and excess on their expenditure side further contradicting the company’s goals. However, some industry may embark on conservation efforts but not until they weigh their projected costs against the benefits.
Hence, only those companies whose advantage is high will conserve the forests but only in the short term. After the depletion of timber resources, the companies will equally quit (Perlin 123). Enforcement of policies and formulation of policies that would prohibit logging would lead to search for alternative sources of resources. Specifically, the logging in the forests are motivated by search for sources fuels or other resources. After imposition of bans prohibiting logging, the affected people will look for alternatives sources of fuel, which could
...Download file to see next pages Read More