Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
The paper "Two Basic Types of Inspection Used in Sampling for Process Control" discusses that the attributes aspects suppose that random samples of a fixed value of the number size n taken from a group with a given number of defective products. The number of defects follows a binomial distribution…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Two Basic Types of Inspection Used in Sampling for Process Control"
Name
Course
Date
Unit 036: Statistical Process Control
1. Two basic types of inspection used in sampling for process control
The two types of sampling used in inspection are:
a) Sampling inspection by attributes
b) Sampling inspection by variables
a) Sampling inspection by attributes
This is a method used to evaluate the quality or the characteristics of an item and classifying them as nonconforming or conforming depending on whether it is conforming to the standard specification. They can be characterized in terms of quantity or quality. The numbers of items which have nonconforming attributes are counted and if the number has not been exceeded, the lot is accepted. The advantage of this method is it simple to use and is more robust (Das, 2008).
b) Sampling inspection by variables
This method is used to evaluate the quality of items by measuring the value of the variable characterizing the inspected commodity. This method begins by selecting a number of items and measuring the characteristics or the dimensions so as to know if the characteristics of the sample are within the particular limits but not the actual value of the characteristics. The acceptance of a lot is based on the calculations of the variability or the average of the measurements in accordance with the set standards. This method requires smaller sample size compared to attribute method. It also provides more information about the effects of the process or mean on the quality (Das, 2008; Ravindran, 2008).
2. Significance of natural and assignable causes of variation
Causes of variation are important during a quality inspection of a product. Thus, an understanding variation is essential for the management and success of operation process. Variation can be classified as natural variation and assignable variation. Natural variation is common or chance causes of variability, which occurs and cannot be traced to a particular cause. It is created by number of influences of minor factors within a predictable range and little can be done other than revise the change the fundamental process. This variation is the sum of a number of effects of multifaceted interaction of random cause, which may be slight. A set of random or common causes that creates variation in the product quality may originate from the variation from the input to the process. An old machine, for example, has a higher degree of natural variability compared to a new machine. Sources of this variation include temperature changes, vibration of the equipment, changes in the emotion and physical conditions of the operator or electrical changes. The process is stable if the common variations are present (Harry, 2010; Ravindran, 2008).
Assignable variation represents large unsatisfactory interruptions to the normal performance process. They are those effects which can be detected and controlled. A process operating with the existence of assignable causes is said to be out of control. They may include defective raw materials, improperly adjusted machine or operator error. These effects can be traced in order to change the equipment, operation technique or the materials used. A control chart may be used for monitoring the process in order to detect the presence of assignable causes. Thus, if the plot point is outside the limits of the control charts, the assignable cause is likely to have occurred. The process of variability can be reduced by identifying these occurrences and working to remove the causes from their process (Harry, 2010).
3. Frequency distribution and mean, range and standard deviation
The table for Frequency distribution
Class
Frequency
x mid
x mid f
xmid - x
(xmid - x)2
(xmid - x)2f
825 - 929
9
827
7443
-13.61
185.232
1667.089
830 - 834
14
832
11648
-8.61
74.132
1037.849
935 - 939
1
837
837
-3.61
13.032
13.032
840 - 844
12
842
10104
1.39
1.932
23.185
845 - 849
9
847
7623
6.39
40.832
367.489
850 - 854
1
852
852
11.39
129.732
129.732
855 - 859
2
857
1714
16.39
268.632
537.2642
960 - 964
6
862
5172
21.39
457.532
2745.193
Total
54
45393
31.12
1171.057
6520.833
Mean is given by
== 840.61 ohms
Sample standard deviation,
= ohms
The range is given by
861.9 - 826 = 35.9 ohms
4. Characteristics of the normal curve to the distribution of the means of small samples
Small samples in distribution graph shows normal distribution. For example, column 1, 2, and 3 are almost symmetrical about the central point. The same observation is shown in columns 2, 3 and 4. The last three columns are skewed. For normal the distribution, the median position coincides with the mean and the mode. The calculated mean value, which is 840.61 ohms, and the median, 844.5, does not coincide in the data set.
5. Appropriate control chart limits
The upper control limit = Average value + 3 x Standard deviation = 840.61 + (3x11.092) = 873.886 ohms
The lower control limit = Average value – 3 x Standard deviation = 840.61 - (3x11.092) = 807.334 ohms
6. Control charts for variables, rejects per unit and percentage defectives per batch
7. Control program for an application
Control Program
Defective motors
X = Subgroup Id (1 to 18)
Numdef = Number of defective items in sub-group
Size = Total number of items in sub-group
Serial read numdef
Data:
Serial read size
Data:
Let x = Sequence 1 to 18
Lines solid solid dot dot
Xlimits 0 18
Xtic offset 0 1
Ylimits 0 10
Ytic offset 18
P control chart numdef size x
8. Ungrouped data (the mean, range and standard deviation)
Table showing the data set
Resistors (ohms)
Sample number
1
2
3
Mean
Range
1
833
833.1
832
832.7
2
2
840
840
841
840.333
1
3
833
833.3
835
833.767
2
4
847
847.4
847.5
847.3
0.5
5
826
826.5
826.6
826.367
0.6
6
840
840.6
840.8
840.467
0.8
7
833
833.7
833.9
833.533
0.9
8
854
854.8
854.7
854.5
0.8
9
861
861.9
861.6
861.5
0.9
10
840
840.8
840.5
840.433
0.8
11
847
847.7
847.6
847.433
0.6
12
833
833.6
833.7
833.433
0.7
13
826
826.5
826.8
826.433
0.8
14
861
861.4
861.9
861.433
0.9
15
840
840.3
840.4
840.233
0.4
16
847
847.4
847.8
847.4
0.8
17
833
833.5
833.4
833.3
0.5
18
826
826.6
826.3
826.3
0.6
Total
15126.87
15.6
Standard deviation, σ =, where dn =2.059 (Hartley’s constant) (Das, 2008).
Sample size, n = 3
Therefore, σ = 0.867/3 = 0.289 ohms
Standard errors = = 3 x 0.289/= 0.5
9. Relationship between the normal curve and the mean values
The process mean is approximately at the median position, indicating that there generally normal distribution.
10. Select and group the data based on variable and attribute inspection methodology.
Based on variables aspects of the data, it is assumed that the quality of the characteristics of the data set follow normal distribution with the standard deviation σ and the mean, x.
The attributes aspects suppose that random samples of fixed value of the number size n taken from a group with a given number of defective products. Therefore, the number of defects follows binomial distribution.
11. Control charts, calculate the limits
Control limits = = 840.3810.5 ohms
Upper control limit = 840.881 ohms
Lower control limit = 839.881 ohms
Range chart
Control line = 2.57 = 2.57 x 0.867 = 2.228 ohms
12. Control chart for variable inspection methodology, showing rejects per unit and percentage defects per batch
Control chart
References
Walker, H. F. (2012). The certified quality inspector handbook. Milwaukee, Wis: ASQ Quality Press.
Das, (2008). Statistical Methods (Combined), Tata McGraw-Hill Education
Harry, M. J. (2010). Practitioner's guide for statistics and lean six sigma for process improvements. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons.
Ravindran A. R,, (2008). Operations Research Applications, Operations Research Series
CRC Press
Read
More
Share:
sponsored ads
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the report on your topic
"Two Basic Types of Inspection Used in Sampling for Process Control"
with a personal 20% discount.