Failure and Error analysis - Term Paper Example

Insert Failure and Error Analysis Learning from failure In coming up with designs, engineers are recommended to understand what can go wrong and the designs that will aid avoid the failure. The article spans across time with a review of history failure in engineering products. Firstly, I identify with the Quebec Bridge did collapse. The dimensions of the bridge are elaborated and what ultimately led to the collapse. Secondly, there are twelve cases of failure analyzed in the document, which have all enabled the engineers to time to enact features and codes in the operation of the engineering work to avoid the same occurrence.

Lastly, acknowledged from the cases is the fact that what leads to failure are leadership, material, tools, and environment and should all be looked into when designing a product in the engineering discipline (Delatte 1-12).Human error in engineeringMany factors contribute to human error in their daily operation, which include high pressure at work, complexities in technicality tasks, and the environmental disposition. By anticipating human factors principles and research based on a systematic collection of data, does aid in coming up with improved control systems, high quality of information, and enhanced human resource management, which all add up to human safety.

The most common cause of errors from human operation according to Brosnan (2008) is the negligence attributed to incompetence, which I have felt in my actions. In addition, ignorance, having an oversight amidst greed contributes to failure (Brosnan 11). Disorganization of the leadership structure breaks communication channel and flow of information and leads to misuse, abuse, and neglect, which breaks down the smooth operation hence attracting failure. Types of errors that exist are the bounded, imperfect and reluctant rationality errors, which all are either individual or collective error in engineering.

Errors are also adverse or mild and require to be noted during design to avoid catastrophic accidents.Analysis 2000-commonwealth Avenue, 1971 is an engineering error that occurred, and I relate to it personally. The licensing of engineering work in any organization, institution and level of work is crucial (Delatte 1-3). The overseer bodies, which ensure that designs are well-elaborated and meet standards, require that the best practices be adhered. According to the Brosnan (2008) categorization, the issues here were unsafe acts and supervision (Brosnan 13).

In addition, the individual errors committed become collective and led to the catastrophe as experienced. From the incidence, leadership, skills, and licensing bodies should put engineering work to the task. In my endeavor to deliver a solution, which requires engineering input, I now acknowledge the importance of leadership, standards and competence. I will endeavor to uphold them in service delivery for safety in the engineering process and products via safe design.Works CitedBrosnan, David.

"Managing Human Error in structural Engineering." Failure and Error Analysis 11.1 (2008): 1-15.Delatte, Norbert. "Learning From Failures." Failure and Error Analysis 12.2 (2006): 1-19.