Joint Strike Fighter - Case Study Example

Joint Strike Fighter Insert Insert The JSF is intended to fill the roles of which current fighters Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) was a determination to succeed the F-22 Raptor and the F-16 fighting falcon. Moreover, it was meant to totally replace F-35, -18, GR7, F/A-18E/F, AB-8B, A-10, Sea Harrier, GR9 and the AV-8B. The raptor is a fighting machine with abilities to take off from short runways and land vertically. On the other hand, the fighting falcon is superior in terms of fighting readiness.

They have supersonic speeds and are capable of multirole features. The design was intended to be a foil meant for a bomber jet, with scouting assets and a non-crafty fighter.2. What are the top-level system requirements of the JSF? The sponsors of the project brought together the US army and US navy requirements for a fighting plane into a single design. They demanded supersonic, single-engine, single-seat that is stealth, short take-off, multirole features, and vertical landing (Rinaldi, 2001). At the top of the requirement, the list is efficiency in cost while assembling all features from the predecessor plane into one.

The top-level requirement was to land vertically, take off at shorter runways, and remain invisible to enemies in war.3. What is the structure of the acquisition?JSF program came into being under a program structure that had a basis of a complicated set of associations that brings together the government Department of Defense (DOD) and industry players Boeing and Lockheed Martin. In addition, onboard were eight other partners including Canada, the UK, and Australia. The development was shaped in a competition outfit given to Boeing and Lockheed-Martin for a period of four years, which took the government a total of $200 billion.

The SJF program in design focused on coming up with a solution to the challenges the partners explained they faced in air combat planes.4. What are the key features of the Boeing design relative to the requirements? The focus by Boeing included improving on affordability, and the capability to perform while it remains a fighter machine. The design focused on takeoff and landing approaches to a superior war-based machine. The takeoff was to be a short runway and a vertical landing. They came up with refined empennage that had horizontal tails to enhance control power.

They maintained the leading-edge sweep of the delta wing for speeds and stealth merits. Moreover, they came up with an aft-sweeping chin inlet, which is regarded as lighter with superior aerodynamic performance for the attack. From the earlier F-22 raptor, and F-16 versions, the decision was to maintain wing sweep, vertical tail, fore-body, and wingspan with the addition of diagonal fins. They also adopted the low-weight and simple machine for a direct lift design (Rinaldi, 2001).