#5 Let the Committee Decide - Case Study Example

LET THE COMMITTEE DECIDE LET THE COMMITTEE DECIDE Introduction When speaking of centralized controls, one is referring to a situation where the education administrative authority is not vested, on the people but in a centralized body. This main body has complete control over all resources that pertain to the educational system. Lunenburg, in 2010 explains that school decision-making models fall under, political, organized, rational-bureaucratic, and participatory decision-making paradigms. He adds that during the decision-making process, many factors like the administrators personal bias, values, beliefs, leadership style can influence their actions.

However, in any learning institution the decisions are vital since they impact the learners, teachers and community (P.2, L.24).Principals, often don’t advocate the model since it leaves only a few people within the school committee with the power to make decisions that affect the entire administration. According to them, this initiative directly undermines the principles administrative role, limits creativity and general commitment.Possible perceived advantages of dividing administrative functions into organizational units include: allowing for more targeted governance within the organizational divisions.

The division of responsibilities will guarantee accountability and efficiency in administrative roles. As well as provide an opportunity in measuring individual performance of the appointed management.The cons of dividing administrative funding include less self-sustainability - in that smaller sections often tend to face challenges in regards to human and natural resource available to carry out the organizational tasks. Since, they are still dependent on the central body for regular funds and resources.

They are also known to affect the unity since some of the management, divisions and distributions of resources choices are bias, and this will ultimately affect unity and lead to in fights. The perceived advantages of committee panel making administrative decisions include the commonly identified aspect of automatically gaining access to the accumulative group knowledge which results in an advantage to the organization. In addition, it makes the decisions more professional and due to its participative nature can contribute to the general satisfaction of the teachers.

On the other hand, the perceived disadvantages with using committees for decision making include. The members tend to shift towards extreme or exaggerated decisions, in that person acting as a committee often seem to make decisions that individuals working alone would not have advocated in light of the same information. It is mainly because a person’s role in such settings weighs less on them as compared to solitary decisions. The impact of that is that not much thought goes into some of the conclusions reached as a group.

Lastly, competition and sluggishness in such collective settings is a problem, since members often seem to want to outdo each other in terms of issues. By often suggesting radical solutions that are not beneficial, to the matter and then promoting their solutions and interests at best (Hao & Suen, 2009. p.376, L 21-42).ReferenceHao, L., & Suen, W. (2009). Viewpoint: Decision‐making in committees.Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne déconomique, 42(2), 359-392.Lunenburg, F.C. (2010).

The decision making process. National forum of educational administration and supervision journal 27, 4,1-12.Retrieved on November 08, 2014 from http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Lunenburg,%20Fred %20C.%20The%20Decision%20Making%20Process%20NFEASJ%20V27%20N4%202 010.pdf