# 4 A Bullys Threat - Case Study Example

A Bully’s Threat al affiliation A Bully’s Threat Carl has forced the entire school management to launch a ‘manhunt to find him. It might not have been necessary, but his actions contributed to the situation. He was not in class at a vital moment when everyone was looking for him, and no one knew his whereabouts. We see Brian go to the principals office to report a matter that he thinks is a big concern. It evokes the question as to why he only wants to tell the principal. The principal immediately summons Angie to confirm any doubts.

It is what makes the principal take urgent actions to inform Brians parents and get advice from his peers in management. It is a manifestation the need of advice from others in situations of urgent attention (Woods & Wolke, 2003, P 387). We see this from the different recommendations suggested by the guard, assistant principal and the counselor. To make suitable decisions, it is imperative that we take into account all the details. It will ensure that we do not make hasty decisions ignoring other crucial information.

It also creates a calm environment for proper decision-making. Mr. Milhoviak asked for advice on both occasions that they could not find Carl. If I were the principal, I would consider Carls record of fighting as a factor in making my decision. Brian says that he is sure that Carl will hurt him and his family. Reporting the matter to the principal may be due to other factors like student grudges, but Angie supports Brian claim. Carl is also fond of making threats. For instance, Carl goes to a rock concert with Angie and threatens a person in the front seat; it takes the intervention of a security guard to calm the situation.

Angie says that Carl seems to be an angry person; angry people tend to get more involved in violence. Carl is missing and has made a threat; the decision the officials will make has to consider the fact that Carl is unstable. Carls situation gets complicated when the officials find out that he is not in class. Missing the fourth period leads to the conclusion that he is up to something considering he has threatened Brian and his family. Maybe he is going to carry out the threat. The situation at hand is delicate; a death threat is on the plate, the perpetrator is missing, Angies parents are out of reach and Brian and Angie are scared.

If I were the principal on this event; firstly, I would make sure that Brian and Angie stay under my watch until I contact their parents. Secondly, I would launch a search party for Carl. Lastly, I would consult the school guard, counselor and select officials to get their advice and weigh on them (Smith, Pepler, & Rigby, 2004, P 23). I hope that I would have made the right decision. Jamels suggestion about the parents filing a complaint was farfetched. Carl should be located first to establish the truth because the parents children are safe under Jamel.

The parents, though, should be alert of the threat. It is a logical step to contact the police when one gets a gun threat. Evidence, however, is necessary. In this circumstance, it is essential that all options are exhausted before informing the police. We should contact the police when we exhaust all efforts to find Carl.ReferencesSmith, P. K., Pepler, D. J., & Rigby, K. (2004). Bullying in schools: how successful can interventions be?. New York: Cambridge University Press.Woods, S., & Wolke, D. (2003). Does the Content of Anti-Bullying Policies Inform us About the Prevalence of Direct and Relational Bullying Behaviour in Primary Schools?. Educational Psychology, 23(4), 381-401.