Making Government Intervention Work for Leadership - Research Paper Example

Making Government Intervention Work for Leadership Christine M. Gallegos Grand Canyon Governance and Structures in Higher Education EDU 812-O101 Dr. Karen Smith August 13, 2014 Abstract Education sector plays a key role in the economic development of country by safeguarding the citizens wherein local, state and federal governments are involved in the higher educational sector. Apart from the involvement of government initiative various private leaders and enterprises also play a major role in reforming educational sectors. However, involvement of local, state, and federal government involvement in higher education institutions can distract leaders from accomplishing their intended goal through creating various restrictions and bounding in successfully implementing their key strategies. Whereas, it not possible for the government to undertake various risks and investments alone, through leveraging excessive bureaucracy rule and other policies it helps the leaders to undertake and implement change initiatives, by taking technological advancement benefit, innovativeness and risk bearing capacity and adequate capital gaining ability., This will improvise the students and institutional outcomes, by increasing recognition so as to provide the best possible education to the learners. Making Government Intervention Work for Leadership Introduction In the present education system, it has become a general trend for the local, state, and federal government to get involved in the higher education institutions that in turn has disrupted the process of implementing change policies. The education system is one of the crucial aspects for developing the economy of a country. The governments are responsible in order to ensure that the citizens are protected with the implementation of stringent education polices. In order to satisfy this role of the government, various responsible agencies are emphasizing the enactment of effective policies to protect the citizens. In the present scenario, the education system is funded mostly by the government and is virtually governed through governmental or by non-profit organization. Contextually, local, state and federal government have less emphasis over the operations of higher education. Nevertheless, when they interfere, a large impact is imposed in the education system for the overall effectiveness. Education is one of the most important aspects for overall development and this is the reason for which government is setting its main priority over it (American Council on Education, 2014). The paper intends to address the involvement of local, state, and federal government in higher education institutions, which distract leaders from accomplishing their intended goals. Further the discussion will be made about how government involvement can be leveraged so as to support institutions at crucial points of implementation various change initiatives. Discussion The initiative of education leaders is to heighten public awareness through focusing on the problems that are persisting in the public schools. The persisting problems are resolved through engaging in various reforms, through involving partners, which includes civic groups, government and other respective sectors, as well as education itself. The educational leaders put their continuous efforts in enforcing goals into actions that will eventually help to develop the education system of a nation (Institute for Educational Leadership, 2001). Leaders play a key role in the transformation process of the entire society and helps in necessary changes. It can be stated that the quality within leaders were curtailed for improvising the student outcomes and institution, increasing recognition so as to provide the best possible education to the learners. Government involves into the educational institutions for several reasons such as providing educational opportunity to every individual, making education affordable, safeguard preservation of equality and create social fabric among other. However, involvement of government restricted the educational leaders to improvise their key goals (Alliance for the Separation of School & State, 2008). Government is involved in educational system. In this regard it can be stated that leveraging support from the local, state and federal government might lead towards hindrance for the leaders to perform effectively. The interference from the government, at the initial stage, may cause hindrances to leadership growth in the education institutions, but stress should be provided on its long-term value generation capacity to assist overall development in the sector. Whereas, leaders of educational institutes were directly liked towards achieving key reforms but, the various governmental initiatives enable them to restrict from such practices. When the government spends towards the public education sector, it will create excess bureaucracy and inefficiency for the leaders to implement the key change strategies that they need to implement in institutes. Excessive bureaucracy rule in the field, led limited scope for the leaders to make change initiatives. Furthermore, it is important for the government to identify the effective educational institutions and empowering them for more efficiency and effectiveness. Moreover, the government should identify the institutions that are ineffective and reform them rather than imposing strict policies. Education has become the fundamental right of every citizen for a better future. Having poor results, improvisation is necessary with huge investment in the government and central educational institutes to give better results and reduce pitfalls, wherein centralized governmental involvement is necessary (Shenk, 2010; Institute for Educational Leadership, 2001). Regulations that were imposed by federal government have a positive impact on the higher education. Federal rules may assist the entire educational sector to reform and increase its effectiveness by involving academic freedom, access and equality, protecting intellectual property, student privacy and safety. However, regulations also sometimes can be overreaching. Correspondingly, amending these regulations often requires considerable amount of time as well as financial resources with little benefit over educational reform. The primary objective through leveraging the local, state or federal government is to ensure that the regulatory burden over the educational system are limited and are fair (American Council on Education, 2014) Technology in the current scenario plays an important role in every aspect of individual’s daily live and work. Leveraging the government policies to enable the technological advancement in process and implement the same in educational sectors helps the leader’s in providing powerful learning experiences, as well as various resources that ensures student achievements in more comprehensive, dependable, and meaningful ways. Technology-based assessment and learning systems creates a positive impact on the students learning, which helps in constant progression in education system through various levels. Technology combined with professional learning will help in better concerted teaching, for preparing and enhancing the student’s competencies and capability over their respective career. However, the technological advance in the respective business sectors like entertainment has a significant impact. Nevertheless, through improvisation of such practices with leveraging the government policies in effective implementation of change initiative will further help the students to enhance their learning experiences (U.S. Department of Education, 2010). Private enterprises have a key role to play in pre-employment and provide training to the students through informal as well as organized education and training system. This private enterprise and nonprofit organizations are lacking behind due to the unavailability of necessary financial benefits and supports. Through improvisation and legislation the government policies help to get financial resources and provide various benefits in the educational sector. Private sector and key leaders who are engaged in education sectors are continuously engaged in delivering innovation through mobilizing resources. In this regard, it is worth mentioning that core strengths of private sector are the availability of finance, innovativeness, ability of providing new approaches and models in the respective field, and to take them into consideration without any bureaucratic delays. Significantly, the leaders of the private sectors can undertake various risks factors that government initiatives and other key player cannot afford in choosing field and while making necessary investments. So it is better to leverage such change reforms, which helps the leaders to make necessary innovation by taking various risk under consideration (Anderson & Gardiner, 2013). Through more control of government in the educational sectors the possibility of misusing of funds are very high due to corruption problems. Furthermore, weak monitoring over the institutional performance because of dysfunctional inspection system and lack in consistency and uniformity in the information system are the major pitfalls in the corporate governance structure. Whereas, leveraging the system and enabling the leaders to make necessary change initiatives will help to achieve overall productivity and efficiency in the educational sector (The World Bank Group, 2012). Government involvement can be levered through enabling the leaders to come up with new institutions that will help the overall development of economic growth. This will provide more opportunity for the students to grab the educational facilities and provide add-on benefits to government initiatives for reforming the economy through reducing various challenges that the country faces. Many of the core institutes, colleges and universities in the urban areas have an enormous impact over the economies. Whereas, many key private entities have a major contribution towards various institutes in order to train and nurture new business. Universities and colleges have major contribution towards the nurturing new business through providing better education and training. For leveraging assets and resources, the colleges and the universities require adopting proper strategic plans. Significantly, leveraging the government involvement in such reforms will enable to make necessary changes without any delay of implementing bureaucracy rules and regulations (Initiative for a Competitive Inner City, 2014). Conclusion From the above discussion, it can be comprehended that government plays a significant role in the educational sector. Education system is a key aspect for the economic growth of the country. The government involves in the educational sector to ensure that their citizens are being protected. However, it has been concluded that local, state, and federal government involvement in higher education institutions can distract leaders from accomplishing their intended goals. Furthermore, the government involvement could be leveraged to support institutions at crucial points during the implementation of change initiatives in order to achieve the economic development of the entire nation through combined efforts. Consequently it is better to leverage reforms, which helps the leaders to make necessary innovation by taking various risk under consideration. It is further worth mentioning that the government due to various bureaucratic rules and regulation cannot afford the risk in choosing field and make necessary investments. Leveraging the government involvement in order to help various leaders to initiate changes for betterment of reforms in the entire sector can leads towards more innovation and mobilizing resources. References Anderson, A. & Gardiner, A. (2013). Improving education governance and financing: a bigger role for the private sector. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/education-plus-development/posts/2013/02/20-education-governance-financing-anderson Alliance for the Separation of School & State. (2008). Why shouldnt the government be involved in education? Retrieved from http://www.schoolandstate.org/Case/case2.htm American Council on Education. (2014). Government regulation. Retrieved from http://www.acenet.edu/advocacy-news/Pages/Government-Regulation.aspx Institute for Educational Leadership. (2001). Leadership for student learning: restructuring school district leadership. Retrieved from http://www.iel.org/programs/21st/reports/district.pdf Initiative for a Competitive Inner City. (2014). Leveraging colleges and universities for urban economic revitalization: an action agenda. Retrieved from http://www.icic.org/ee_uploads/publications/UIFINAL.PDF Shenk, J. (2010). The problem with government schools. Retrieved from http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/10/the_problem_with_government_sc.html The World Bank Group. (2012). Governance and management in the education sector. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTCAMEROON/Resources/governance-and-management-in-the-education-sector-march2012.pdf U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Executive summary. Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov/technology/netp-2010/executive-summary Read More