Mikell versus School Administrative Unit 33 - Assignment Example

3. STATUTE AND CODE OF ETHICS
The ASCA code of ethics involved in this case is A7 about the danger to self and others. A school counselor is supposed to inform guardians about risks to self and others and consult with counseling professionals. There is also about understanding the ethical and legal liability for releasing a student who is a danger to himself and others without proper support for the student.

4. OUTCOME
The Supreme Court affirmed the decision by the trial court to dismiss the claims of alleged negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and wrongful death claims.

5. REASONING
The reasons for the dismissal of these claims against the school administration were based on the fact that the school did not have custodial care of the child at the time of death. They also did not engage in outrageous or extreme conduct that would drive the boy to commit suicide.

6. LEGAL DOCTRINE AND HOW WOULD YOU HAVE HANDLED THE SITUATION DIFFERENTLY TO AVOID LEGAL ISSUES
The case is not so much based on legal doctrines or ethical ones but on parental ones. The parent did not follow up on the suicide case with the school or with the boy about the causes. She should also have been keeping a close eye and not leaving him alone. Telling the parents every detail is important for a school counselor. Read More