StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Brown v Board of Ed - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
The Cases of Brown et al Versus Board of Education Name Institution Course The Cases of Brown versus the Board of Education Americans have been struggling to overcome racial discrimination and promote equality for a long time. The anti-discrimination efforts started a long time back…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.9% of users find it useful
Brown v Board of Ed
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Brown v Board of Ed"

The Cases of Brown et al Versus Board of Education The Cases of Brown versus the Board of Education Americans have been struggling to overcome racial discrimination and promote equality for a long time. The anti-discrimination efforts started a long time back. Racism has existed in this nation since the 1890’s. The minority groups namely Negroes, Hispanics, Latinos and Indians have suffered the most out of the race issue. Early in the 1900’s education belonged to the whites only. The minority groups demanded the freedom to enjoy equal rights. The government then embarked on a policy that encouraged both blacks and whites to attend school. However, there was strict segregation. Blacks and whites attended different schools. This condition brought about the five cases demanding inclusion in schools. One of cases involved the parents of a little girl versus the board of education of Topeka. The girl’s parents intended to enroll her in an all-white school. This was in the 1950’s and although schools for blacks and whites were separate, they claimed they offered equal opportunities. These are the reasons why Brown and other black children could not receive admissions in the all-white schools. Before Brown’s case, the American society especially in the south believed in ‘separate and equal’ doctrine laid out by the Supreme Court after Plessey versus Fergusson case in 1896. In many states, the doctrine received an interpretation that further led to blacks feeling inferior. In most states, school systems favored white schools offering them better learning opportunities and facilities. On the other hand, black children suffered. Only a percentage of them attended school while all white children had access to quality education. Black children had to walk miles to get to school if schools in their neighborhoods were for whites. Conditions in black schools were poor. Many blacks filed lawsuits in district courts demanding fair treatment between whites and blacks but they lost (Miller, 2004). Conditions were similar in Delamere, Virginia, Kansas and other southern states. Similar cases against high school and college segregation were coming up often. According to Anderson (2004), Thurgood Marshall and members of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People took up many of the cases fighting for desegregation in schools. The Supreme Court that had that laid out the ‘separate but equal’ doctrine received various challenges regarding the use of the same against blacks. In most schools, separate applied but equality was far beyond reach. The states spend a large amount to educate whites and only a small percentage went to black schools. The Brown et al cases received hearings in district courts in 1952-1955 but they lost. The courts supported the school system and its regulations. Most of these courts were not ready to believe that blacks did not have a fair chance in education. Fortunately, the Supreme Court decided to hear all the five cases concerning segregation after considerations of their appeals. Oliver Brown was one of the parents who volunteered to testify in the case. NAACP had made efforts and won the Delamere case that denied some children admission in a white school. This victory increased the enthusiasm of the people. The judge ruling the case mentioned that the Supreme Court should change its stand concerning the ‘separate and equal’ policy (Miller, 2004). The Supreme Court hearing of these cases marked a benchmark in the desegregation of schools in America. Parents volunteered to testify during the case hearing and presented evidences on the injustice that black children were facing. Members of NAACP, Thurgood Marshall and other colleagues explained to the Supreme Court on the effects of segregation of black children. Psychological experts presented their views on the long-term effects that segregation would cause on the black children. The victory in these cases was a celebration to every black because it formed one of the platforms that would grant all citizens equal rights. The Supreme Court declared that schools should focus on inclusion and offering both whites and blacks equal opportunities in education (Anderson, 2004). The victory of the brown case and the arguments surrounding it has received many criticisms. It is worth noting that the victory gave birth to integration in schools. Most of the people challenging the ruling do so out of their personal convictions brought about by racial prejudices. Some logical arguments exist as well. There are views that the Supreme Court did not give a definitive ruling on integration. There are obvious consequences for this because the nation faces challenges in the integration process. The brown cases achieved a remarkable victory that granted black children an equal opportunity pertaining education. The colored people have benefited because of the victory as it gave them hope that integration in other sectors was a possibility. The process of full integration and inclusion has never been easy for America. However, things are better than they were during the Jim Crow era. Black children have access to quality education and a better learning environment. In the southern states where segregation rated highest in the 1950’s, currently, they have embraced integration and inclusion in most of the schools. Studies reveal that in this region, integration has had great success. This is living proof of the brown legacy. References Anderson, W. (2004). Brown v. Board of Education: The case against school segregation. New York: Rosen Pub. Group. Miller, J. (2004). Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka: Challenging school segregation in the Supreme Court. New York: PowerKids Press. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Brown v Board of Ed Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/education/1457414-brown-v-board-of-ed
(Brown V Board of Ed Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
https://studentshare.org/education/1457414-brown-v-board-of-ed.
“Brown V Board of Ed Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/education/1457414-brown-v-board-of-ed.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Brown v Board of Ed

FP Iran V. Secretary of State for the Home Department

Prior to discussing the importance of the present case in the development of Administrative Law, it is important to understand the facts of the case. The brief facts of the case, FP (Iran) V. Secretary of State for the Home Department (2007), is that the Appellant, an asylum seeker, had initially filed an appeal, through counsel, against the Home Office’s rejection of her claim for asylum, before the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (henceforth referred to as AIT). The AIT held that the said appeal was not valid giving error of law as the reason for its decision. A rehearing was fixed and a notice of the same was sent to the last known address of the Appellant. However, the Appellant having shifted residence did not get the n...
8 Pages(2000 words)Assignment

Employment Law: Simpson v AFS and Tom Barnes Case

What is usually required is that the person vicariously liable has in some manner conceivably authorized the conduct giving rise to the tort. There are three circumstances in which one person may be held vicariously liable for the misconduct of another.1 They are:

1. A master/servant relationship such as an employer/employee. In these types of relationships, the master is liable for the misconduct of an employee provided the latter is acting in the course of his or her employment.

On the facts of the case for discussion, the vicarious liability involved turns on the master/servant or employer/employee relationship. The general rule is that it is the nature and circumstances of the actual employment that justi...
13 Pages(3250 words)Case Study

Informal v. Formal Remittances

In this case, the transfer of money across the borders becomes an issue of primary importance for many families internationally (especially when these families are located in developing countries). In practice, it has been found that the transfer of money internationally can present significant failures especially when the firms involved do not take the appropriate measures for the protection of the consumer. However, in the case of workers, such an outcome can lead to severe consequences (the financial support of the family faces a delay within unknown outcomes). In the literature, the transfer of money across the world has been an issue extensively analyzed. Most of the relevant studies prove that the lack of appropriate technol...
37 Pages(9250 words)Assignment

Analysis of Lemuel Shaw 1830 Roberts v. The City of Boston Case

In 1801, Lemuel Shaw started studying law and was admitted to the bar in September 1804; after which he started practicing in Boston. Slowly his practice became large, however, he also served as the adviser of several commercial enterprises. Not only that, he held many public positions, from 1811 – 1814, as well as in 1820 and 1829, he was a member of the Massachusetts House of Representatives, during 1820 he also was a member of the constitutional convention, while in 1821 –1822, he served as a state senator. He was offered the position of Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Court; after being so appointed in 1830, he served there for 30 years, till August 21, 1860, when he resigned. He had four children from t...
7 Pages(1750 words)Case Study

Analysis of the Case of Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheepbreeders Association Ltd

There were several basic legal provisions that gave direction to the formation of a company in the United Kingdom. It has its original foundation in 1844 when the Joint Stock Companies Act1 1844 was formulated. It has given regulations for facilitating the formation of companies by "deed of settlement". Gradually, the shareholder concept was initiated in 1855 by the general incorporation procedure in the name of Limited Liability Act2 1855. This has offered limited liability to shareholders and provided identification to the company as a separate legal persona. The doctrine of limited liability postulates that a company shall be liable for the debts that it incurs, and even if it undergoes closure for any grounds, creditors cannot...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study

John Lockes View of Ownership in Context with the Mabo v Queensland

According to Ian Harris, Locke’s idea of justice simply suggests that the conformity between action & the rule of propriety should be understood in the sense of ‘a right to anything’ (Harris, 2000, p. 49). That means human rights must be restored in society, and when it comes to property, it can be examined in context with ‘abundance’. The more abundant is the property, the more usage of it can be met. However, the ‘abundance’ factor cannot be fulfilled in today’s economic conditions. Chapter V of the Second Treatise defines ‘property’ as land according to Locke and can be examined in two different ways. First, that land, property or external objects that are owned by...
7 Pages(1750 words)Term Paper

Henry V by Shakespeare and the Rover by Aphra Behn

Henry V recognizes that his kingship is not a rule of lavishness but a rule of service. Summarising everything of what Henry is, Nym, a commoner, and thief, claimed: “The King is a good King…” (Shakespeare, Henry V)
Second, his glib of tongue he uses to empower his soldiers, to give life and courage to his downtrodden men. He does not use his eloquence to deceive nor to perpetuate lies. Rather, he uses his articulateness to restore the bravery of his soldiers, to supplicate God in his favor. All of which is a recognition that Henry V values more the camaraderie that he has with his soldiers above anything else. And this he succinctly shows even as a young King. He said to his men as they are about to fight...
7 Pages(1750 words)Book Report/Review

The Case of R v Turnbull

The defendants planned to rob a bank’s customer deposits in the bank’s safe by posting a notice diverting the dropbox to another location, which they planned to burgle. Several customers did, in fact, drop their wallets loaded with money into the dropbox, however, one customer was suspicious and alerted the police. The strength of the prosecution’s case rested on the visual recognition provided by a police constable who clearly saw one of the defendants removing a sign from the bank premises and recognized him. On this basis, the court of appeal concluded that the appeal of the defendants could not stand. It was held that if visual identification had been the only evidence, the outcome would not have been definit...
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study

Analysis of OReilly v Mackman Case

Judicial review is a concept which is constitutionally undecided as it on one side, it shores up the rule of law, democracy, and pre-eminence of parliament by facilitating the courts to check the boundaries of government authority and on another side, the courts are open to the decision on the plants based on the fact of separation of authorities that are intimating with the verdicts of democratically elected institutions. Judicial review is not apprehended with the virtues of government assessment but deals with whether the deciding authority has remained within the legal boundaries and whether broad principles of rationality and fairness adhere. The constitutional basis of judicial review is debated as one view holds that it is...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

International Affairs v. Liberalism

As a matter of fact, Hoffman’s statement that “international affairs is the nemesis of liberalism” has a grain of truth in it and this is especially so after the 9/11 incident.
There are two schools of thought or perspectives that are used to view international affairs: liberalism and realism. The study of these two perspectives is significant to the idea posed by Stanley Hoffman because they determine the reasons why international affairs, according to him, does not only see eye-to-eye with liberalism but seems to stand on the opposing side of it.
Liberalism can be defined as having four elements: citizens; the legislature; property rights, and; a market-driven economy (Dunne 186). Realism, on the othe...
6 Pages(1500 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Brown v Board of Ed for FREE!

Contact Us