Physical appearance has an upper hand in winning of elections. Discrimination has been an issue of concern for many years. Its roots deepened in the 19th century when most of the cities in America prohibited people with unsightly body figures from appearing in the public…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Ritical Thinking. Physical appearance in winning of elections"
This discrimination went farther to a fact that it described unsightly people as those who are diseased, maimed, mutilated, or deformed. These people were not supposed to be seen in any public places, and if so, they were to be fined for each appearance. Over the years, the countries have tried to fight against this law and have partially succeeded. There has been an expansion in the protection against prejudice to involve race, belief, gender, epoch, disability, and, sexual chauvinism. Though there is an improvement in these fields, outward show remains allowable in many states. Appearance has affected many grounds including the political arena. It has been proven that beauty among politicians has resulted to political victory (Berggren, 2006). During election campaigns, a certain group of people evaluates many traits to make one acceptable. History of past winning candidates show that beauty results to greater success than proficiency, intellect, amiability, or reliability. Some people have tried to compare the gender that is likely to get affected by this phenomenon in a greater way. Men are not exceptions, but the women are highly affected. Due to this stipulation, many people have taken it upon themselves to study this aspect of victory. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology has covered a research to provide information whether people vote for beauty. Most of their study was just a confirmatory process because, just like Disney Villains, the political processes seem to suffer from obsessions with outward looks. Many people might employ the factor of being pretty in this matter, but it is essential to note that it runs deeper than that. Stereotypical candidates seem to have greater chances in the victorious struggle. The candidates that appear to have achieved success in all grounds have greater chances of winning. This is the reason prettiness should be accompanied by the physical gloss. It is important to keep in mind that history has it that good-looking candidates or even beautiful ones have good chances of taking over in the elections (Thinkstock, 2011). Due to the above factors, many people have sought to believe that worth in the society is based on physical appearance. For this reason, many people acquire votes for being thin, muscular, and good looking. This is because these characteristics are linked with popularity, strength, hard work, and above all victorious. If a person with the above characteristics vies for a seat with another individual with a fat stature, he is likely to win. This is because people associate fatness with unattractiveness, sluggishness, lack of knowledge, being hated, and feeble (Johnson, 2010). However, people can at least try to counter this problem by dressing in the right clothes, using right words, and acting in an acceptable manner. This could earn an individual who lacks physical attractiveness some votes simply because of acting smart (Johnson, 2010). Most politicians have their past lives hidden hence their biographies are either too shallow or are missing. Due to this people do not vote in regard to competence but to the likability of the voters. Many political candidates have to influence the public to vote for them through posters. These posters are usually inclusive of one self-portrait. It is clear that during the voting period, many people who do not know the politicians physically will result to a memory check-up. The most memorable politician is ne that had a good portrait on their posters. The attractiveness is contributed by the physical up build. For this reason, it is essential to realize that the attractiveness of a certain candidate influences most of the voters’ behavioral actions (Rosar, 2007). For many years, stereotypes have always
(“Ritical Thinking. Physical appearance in winning of elections Essay”, n.d.)
Ritical Thinking. Physical appearance in winning of elections Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/education/1438933-ritical-thinking-physical-appearance-in-winning-of-elections
(Ritical Thinking. Physical Appearance in Winning of Elections Essay)
Ritical Thinking. Physical Appearance in Winning of Elections Essay. https://studentshare.org/education/1438933-ritical-thinking-physical-appearance-in-winning-of-elections.
“Ritical Thinking. Physical Appearance in Winning of Elections Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/education/1438933-ritical-thinking-physical-appearance-in-winning-of-elections.
He confidently presented Obama’s policy statement and his strong holds, Obama’s administration's policy decision rationale, and strongly defensive his party’s stances on the issues. Republican candidate Paul Ryan looked at loss of words and less confident as compared to Biden (Miles).
Among the nations that felt, what experts came to call Arab Spring, include Tunisia, Yemen, Libya and Egypt among others. Therefore, the main intention of this essay is to predict the person who will win the Egypt elections of May 23 and 24 while giving evidence on why the person stands that chance (Angrist 78).
For the 2008 election the rate of National and Texas votes were 45.67% nationally and 55.45% statewide. If Texas votes for Republicans more, than they vote for Democrats less when compared to the national percentages. Williamson County votes at a higher percentage of Republicans than Travis County, the statewide and national percentages.
in Hoegg and Lewis 895). The commonalities of the contemporary election campaigns are probably aligned with the emergence of overspending money to influence the election results. The candidacy of the aspiring leaders is supported with wealth manifestations, leading one entity to project the output of election.
Several factors are identified to affect a person’s social relationship with his peers, or the type of people that he goes along with. Psychological studies on human behavior and society show that the factors such as physical appearance may influence a person’s self-esteem, perception about life and his attitude towards his environment.
The Map Analysis prior to the close Electoral Campaign shows that President Obama carries a momentous, edge over former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney in the battle for 270 electoral votes this fall, according to the first detailed analysis of
The conclusion from this paper states that looking pretty is acceptable but doing the rounds for surgeries is not. God made you this way and it is definitely okay to look normal. If you own some confident, nobody will ever try to bring you down. Only then will your appearance become so magical and powerful that people will not only admire you but also keep their judgments to themselves.
Shyness is often a considerable handicap in social and occupational situations, and it can be inwardly distressing. Alfano, Joiner, and Perry (1994) pointed out that shyness is often associated with both depression and dysfunctional cognitions. How these dimensions relate to one another, however, is unclear.
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Ritical Thinking. Physical appearance in winning of elections"
with a personal 20% discount.