While it is easy to make a superficial argument that children who are different, with diverse backgrounds or in this case, physical/mental aptitudes might be 'better served' in a specialised institution, this view has been on the decline for decades in much of the industrialised world. …
Download file to see previous pages...
For the interests of education, the best service, and the most funding resides in institutions that generally cater to the general population. With the exception of specialised private academies that may require out-of-pocket expenses for the family, it is highly unlikely that the disabled could be equivalently served by some segregated system in terms of bringing out their full potential. Partly, inclusion has won due to evidence from educational research showing deficiencies from special schools that tend to fall short of reasonable expectations.
For some, the advantages of mainstreaming may seem to be largely a social matter. These programs are simply an effort to make the disabled kids ‘feel better’ about themselves; a nod to our ideals of equality in the face of manifest differences that impossibly impede a normal education. But even in cases of severe mental impairment due to developmental abnormalities; administrators must take a hard look from a material perspective.
If a school were to be set up in response to a small selection of learning disabilities, is it at all likely that these institutions would receive – on a reliable basis – adequate funding on par with the public school system? Would it be possible to attract the most qualified teachers for such schools? Separate but Equal rarely is. The public school system has a mandate to perform its utmost for the entire student population; not merely those considered more ‘normal’....
iduals who may face the real, or imagined specter of discriminating prejudices stemming from mis-information concerning their respective conditions, and or limitations. Ultimately, inclusion has won out mainly because it is most just than the alternatives. Arguments in favor for inclusion are moral arguments, arising from a respect for human rights and decency. (Fulcher, 1993) And, as Skidmore puts it: "From this point of view, institutionalized patterns of selection between schools, and of differentiation within them, impoverish and distort the individual development of every student, for they diminish our understanding of human difference. Participation in a diverse learning community is a prerequisite for the growth of each individuals subjectivity in all its richness; the combined development of all is the condition for the full development of each." (Skidmore, 2003, p. 127) A full learning experience that exposes the child to the length and breadth of society, as sampled by their classmates, is in itself an accommodation worthy of pursuit. And this is true not only for the sake of those with the actual disabilities. Special education in England for over two decades has been subject to rapid change, of which programs allowing for inclusive education have played a pivotal role. But barriers still exist that can impede the development of this morally-mandated educational and social movement. Many of the present barriers to effective inclusion tend to be within both local Governmental sectors, as well as certain, reluctant schools. Ultimately, studies show that the best results will be achieved if unwarranted fears concerning inclusion can be addressed, allowing for a voluntary adoption of Inclusive teaching methods, rather than through Government coercion.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“An analysis on the benefits and challenges of Inclusive Education for Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/education/1429071-write-an-essay-critically-reflecting-on-the
(An Analysis on the Benefits and Challenges of Inclusive Education for Essay)
“An Analysis on the Benefits and Challenges of Inclusive Education for Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/education/1429071-write-an-essay-critically-reflecting-on-the.
The study delves on the means of developing an inclusive special education curriculum in a school in United Kingdom. The focus of the study is the implementation of policies, as supported by effective practices from other countries.
That is why special needs program was established and as such, it is a program seeking to identify those individuals with special needs and that those needs are in every way unique and takes a different perspective as compared to those of other students and thereby addressing them in a different way (Karger, 2010).
Apart from parents and family members, they have the responsibility to monitor students developing the skills that could help them not only in academic fields, but in life as well. And dealing with special needs students is rather challenging task even for professional educators.
His grasp is normal too. Except for his speech and language difficulty, he is normal in other spheres of communication.
The strategy could be challenging for the disabled student because it is new to him. This student has problem in organizing sound and language.
I found that while he does not know this, this often works to my advantage as a teacher, and I can use this to help him in the long run.
Timmy's main problem is his frequent ability to yell loudly, or not wait to be called on. He is extremely impatient, and because of this can sometimes be a disruption to the other children in the class.
But all of them are not providing the quality and special needs. There has been an increase in the number of special children in almost all the countries. As these students are not treated like other children, most of them are still taken care by the service organizations.
Issues surrounding inclusion debate have included; whether it is right to label children as disabled, whether it is ethical to treat such children differently, teacher training for special education needs, the issue surrounding funding and equipping of such schools.
A few methods for inclusive education, discussed in this paper, have had dramatic results with both the autistic children in the classroom and the people with whom they interact with. These children have been able to learn more readily and teachers have found that many of the disruptions an autistic child can cause are more easily resolved.
There is a need to unravel the true definition or the most acceptable of inclusive education. Additionally one needs to assess whether or not inclusive education has brought positive changes. The negative consequences need to be analysed too. A thorough discussion on inclusive education must not neglect the need for parental involvement and roles played by teachers to facilitate the transition.