Firewalls and the California Law on Security Breach - Research Paper Example

According to Stephen and Michael (2009) firewalls can be implemented both in software and hardware. The common types of firewalls include packet filter, application gateway, circuit-level, and Proxy server. The firewall is placed between the computer and the internet to prevent intruders.

In choosing the firewall to use, there are important issues Bibliofind needed to consider and they include:-Application protection, stealth mode, inbound and outbound filter. Outbound and inbound filter information when they pass through the system, only important information will be allowed to pass while discarding the rest based on the rules which have been created by the Bibliofind Company. This is the primary function of firewalls. Bibliofind ought to have paid attention to this kind of information in order to protect its server from intruders.

Bibliofind should use Stealth mode because it is one of the vital elements or rules to be considered while installing its firewalls as it helps not to block but to make your computer appear as if it does not exist. Due to this, intruders and hackers will be made to think that you are not connected or you are offline.

The use of Intrusion detection is also one of the best ways Bibliofind ought to have used since hackers usually use very many ways to penetrate the security system. Scan for intrusion detection is important and it would have helped Bibliofind to notify the presence of such intruders and Biblofind could have been safe from these hackers.

Q3

Personal information can be defined as; or to include individual name, personal, social status, and any other information which might be of any security concern. When this bill was passed in the state of California, many people supported it while others decline to support it. The argument against this bill is that it might make consumers believe that data breach could lead to stealing of identity and this could lead to the increase of the cost of running the business without benefiting consumers or business people. In examining both social corporate responsibility of any business (Kathryn 2002) argued that it could not fit and the time for presenting the argument in court could be wasting precious time. Besides, the law itself also lacks vital information like the time of the breach or the kind of information that might have been breached.

The law also can be argued in support of it that it will be an eye-opener to the consumer; the consumers will understand well the essence of security for private information and also to protect themselves from identity theft, it could also dispel the uncertainty around security breach and a good step taken in solving one having his or her information breached. The law could make modest and helpful steps in current security breach notification and help in reducing cybercrimes in the whole world if not only the state of California.

Regarding the enacting of this law, (Stephen et al.) argued that if this law is not brought to force, security breaches will go on until that point business society will find the investment needed to implement the security system in the company being more than the cost of investment. It is good that this law comes at the right time to help to solve this problem. It is high time both the government and private investors shift cost-benefit analysis to upgrade a better security system. Good care and standards must be maintained to govern the implementation of this law and the security situation as a whole.