Key Performance Indicators in Sustainable Supply Chain Management - Essay Example

Key Performance Indicators in Sustainable Supply Chain Management Name Course Institution Lecturer Date Table of Contents Abstract 2 1.0 Introduction 3 1.1 Aims and objectives 4 1.2 Research methodology 4 2.0 Literature review 5 2.1 Sustainable supply chain management 5 2.2 Performance indicators 7 2.3 Need for key performance indicators in sustainable supply chain management 9 2.4 Indicators for sustainable management 12 2.4.1 Environmental conditions indicators 13 2.4.2 Social indicators 14 2.4.3 Economic indicators 15 3.0 Conclusion 15 References 16 Abstract Supply chain sustainability as a topic has been of awesome enthusiasm for the most recent decade both in the scholarly world and the experts' reality. There have been pressures from different partners, particularly government controllers, group activists, global competition and non-governmental organisations (NGOs). Therefore, numerous organizations have embraced a certain level of duty to sustainability rehearses. A number of the responsibilities are once in a while shallow and non-mandatory, for instance including the maxim ''Think before you print'' in an organization's electronic mail interchanges. As long as they are not compelled to do as such by law, different organizations are still reluctant to focus on sustainability measures. 1.0 Introduction Organizations are contributors to the environmental, economic and social prossperity to the society. Numerous organizations have embraced different sustainability activities for a mixture of motivations to alleviate the negative social and environmental effects of their operations. It is recognized that the most essential relationship between the society and business has a tendency to originate from corporate and economic welfares. This reality will carry on because associations, as miniaturized scale players in the economy, are vigorously subject to accomplishing financial goals to stay beneficial in the market, while environmental and social welfare have a tendency to be seen as auxiliary objectives. Likewise, a certified change in administration hypothesis and the political economy are required to actuate corporate social responsibility for both the society and the business. The presentation of different ecological enactments and models and reporting systems would imply that organizations at the supply network level need to adjust the three measurements of economic, environmental and social sustainability. Multidimensional execution evaluation structures can bolster corporate exercises in adapting to institutional and partners' pressures and accomplishing the association's long haul policies. 1.1 Aims and objectives The aim of this paper is to audit the literature related to sustainable supply chain management and key performance indicators specifically focusing on the supporting authoritative hypotheses which clarify sustainability activities by associations. This audit will help in distinguishing the essential drivers and empowering influences that persuade the improvement of feasible supply chains. This paper will introduce a multidimensional system joining social environmental and economic execution measures to oversee and survey sustainability in supply chains 1.2 Research methodology With reason to accomplish previously stated objectives, literature review of scholastic papers from universal peer-reviewed journals as well as reports has been carried out. The system of Literature review permits recognizable proof and assessment of existing scholarly research and accordingly could be seen as starting phase of hypothesis building procedure. Data seek procedure incorporate after watchwords: (1) sustainable supply management; (2) sustainable purchasing; (3) key performance indicators; (4) sustainable supply chain. Recognized insightful works were checked on the premise of setting investigation to choose exploration of specific significance to sustainable supply chain management. Additionally, cross reference technique (pearl developing procedure) for paper gathering was utilized, e.g. references utilized as a part of gathered articles were evaluated for further inquiry of significant data sources. Taking after sorts of articles has been looked into: thorough writing audits, contextual analyses and reviews, hypothetical and reasonable works. 2.0 Literature review 2.1 Sustainable supply chain management Sustainable supply chain management includes incorporating financially and environmentally practical practices into the complete production network lifecycle, from item plan and advancement, to material determination, assembling, bundling, transportation, storage, circulation, utilization, reoccurrence and discarding (Gupta & Palsule-Desai, 2011). Ecologically Sustainable supply chain management as well as practices can help associations in decreasing their aggregate carbon foot shaped impression, as well as in enhancing their end-to-end operations to accomplish more noteworthy expense funds and benefit. All supply chains can be streamlined utilizing supportable practices (Berke & Satir, 2011; Hassini, Surti & Searcy, 2012). The reconfiguration or outline of a supply network is considered as a key objective aiming at deciding the number, area and limits of assembling plants and conveyance centers, the arrangement of suppliers to choose and the successful stream of material through the supply network (Berke & Satir, 2011; Carter & Rogers, 2008; Gupta & Palsule-Desai, 2011). The essential concern in a supply chain outline issue is to choose those chain individuals that are necessary to satisfying the long haul wide hierarchical targets in accomplishing unrivalled sustainability objectives. We bound the extent of our study to choice making at this vital arranging level and the system that we display in this paper intends to give backing amid the supply network outline/reconfiguration stage (Carter & Rogers, 2008). Supply chain planning and design include real business and modern exercises, for example, materials procurement, assembling, bundling, transportation and reusing, all of which can force negative natural and social effects if not supervised properly. The ecological features may incorporate GHG discharges, dangerous materials, harmful chemicals and different poisons and acreage utilization and asset exhaustion issues (Carter & Rogers, 2008; Gupta & Palsule-Desai, 2011). Administrations have been attempting to alleviate these issues through ordering more tightly natural administrative enactments. Case in point, taking after the European Commission's obligatory plans and motivation programs, the Australian legislation enacted a carbon impose in 2011 to add to the worldwide diminishment of carbon dioxide outflows. Another case is China forcing limitations on the import and production of items containing mercury or cadmium (Hassini, Surti & Searcy, 2012). According to Berke & Satir (2011), the enhancement of operations has reached out to the SC instead of a particular office or association in the most recent two decades. Supportability in supply chain management should likewise incorporate item plan, fabricating by-items, by-items created amid item utilize, item life expansion, item end-of-life, and recuperation forms at end-of-life, notwithstanding the center supply chain exercises Sustainable improvement can possibly influence future government strategy (Carter & Rogers, 2008; Gupta & Palsule-Desai, 2011), current creation operations, and recognize new plans of action, with new activities being proposed or embraced by both the general population and private parts (Hassini, Surti & Searcy, 2012). Such tying enactments coming about because of the desire for supportability together with the weights forced by the clients have been the primary drivers in the selection of ecological methodologies in supply chain management for organizations around the world. In today's aggressive business markets where globalization and consumer loyalty stand at the front line, the practical and subsequently effective administration of supply chains started by these drivers has soon taken a deliberate way because of some imperative returns, for example, expanded benefit (Gupta & Palsule-Desai, 2011). Hence, the transient interests in manageability are repaid over the long haul. Exploration has demonstrated factually at the nation level that an exchange off between "monetary advancement and riches creation" and manageability does not exist (Carter & Rogers, 2008; Gupta & Palsule-Desai, 2011; Vachon & Mao 2008). 2.2 Performance indicators Regardless of the evident unclearness of the term, performance indicators have been generally utilized for checking and appraisal of various ecological effects of operations, and are progressively utilized as a part of economic and social coliseums. Up to now the accentuation of the larger part of indicators has been put on reporting, instead of administration of effects on mining on maintainable improvement. Thus, up till now, the most vital criteria that characterize valuable indicators are the ability to disentangle, evaluate, investigate and impart generally unpredictable and entangled data, and the capacity to make specific parts of a perplexing circumstance emerge and in this manner lessen the level of instability in the definition of procedures, choices or activities (Chae, 2009). Lately, extensive exertion has gone into the improvement of Sustainability Indicators: autonomous activities have originated from the European Union, OECD, NGOs, UN, national governments, business community and scholars (Chae, 2009). At first, interest was regularly directed at the nearby level, as sustainable society ventures; however Sustainability Indicators have therefore created to fuse provincial, countrywide and worldwide issues (Hervani, Helms & Sarkis, 2005). Moreover, there has been developing driving force in the strategy making coliseum towards creating apparatuses to interpret the idea and objectives of supportability into genuine activity and into measures to survey progress towards them. It is inside of this setting that indicators of supportability have turn out to be progressively imperative (Mandal, 2013). Be that as it may, it is important to present a preventative note (Chae, 2009) – Sustainability Indicators are regularly joined arrangements of social, economic and environmental execution indicators, instead of indicators that are fit for really portraying the degree to which a mining venture is contributing or bringing down reasonable advancement objectives after some time from a between generational value point of view (Gupta & Palsule-Desai, 2011; Hassini, Surti & Searcy, 2012; Hervani, Helms & Sarkis, 2005). This remark likewise holds for the advancement of Sustainability Indicators outside of the mining area. As noted in consequent areas, few pointer frameworks have been created that are fit for portraying execution from diverse partner points of view, particularly the viewpoints of nearby groups that are influenced by a task less still from the viewpoint of indigenous groups that live inside of those local group (Hassini, Surti & Searcy, 2012; M. Tachizawa & Yew Wong, 2014). Notwithstanding these restrictions, there are a few motivations to clarify the notoriety of these indicators: at first the drive to create them was from an administrative point of view (Chae, 2009; Hervani, Helms & Sarkis, 2005). The contention was set forward that just if nature was measured could rational approach be framed, obliging the right needs and proper focuses for development (Mandal, 2013). Since their starting improvement and across the board use, it has turn out to be clear that indicators can best help with the genuine evaluation, administration and observing of effects of mining on feasible advancement objectives (notwithstanding execution reporting), on the off chance that they are produced inside of a general Sustainability Performance Management System, and this idea is investigated in more prominent detail in ensuing areas (de Brito & van der Laan, 2010). Albeit initially created from the viewpoint of administration, all the more as of late performance indicators have additionally come to be viewed as devices for reporting and communication (Chae, 2009; M. Tachizawa & Yew Wong, 2014). This correspondence idea is that, through such indicators individuals from general society and different partners will have the capacity to comprehend the issues and patterns that society needs to take care of (Hervani, Helms & Sarkis, 2005). Especially those not generally open to tangible recognition, for example, vitality utilization, waste generation and an entire scope of social and economic issues. Through provision of information thusly, it is asserted that indicators will teach general society and cause a feeling of social obligation regarding the issues (Lehtinen & Ahola, 2010). Thusly, it is contended, this will urge individuals to change their individual conduct and their political reactions to produce arrangements; this could similarly be connected to the working environment. The responsibility of information as an apparatus for framework change remains constant whether the input circle stays interior to the association (Lehtinen & Ahola, 2010) - for instance, as inner reporting inside of a corporate administration framework - or whether the circle develops past the association into society everywhere - as in outer reporting and the revelation of ecological and social execution data to partners (de Brito & van der Laan, 2010). In both cases, execution data is created and dispersed with the target of giving data that will encourage activity - administrative activity by corporate delegates or financial and political activity by different partners - to enhance execution (Hervani, Helms & Sarkis, 2005). Nevertheless, in the connection of the mining division, few pointer frameworks have been created that are equipped for portraying execution from diverse partner points of view, particularly the viewpoints of neighbourhood groups that are influenced by a venture less still from the viewpoint of indigenous groups (Hervani, Helms & Sarkis, 2005) – coordination of these viewpoints is urgent if mining is grow in a maintainable manner, with the backing of those most influenced by operations. Inside of these restrictions, and as noted above, indicators can, in any case, help firms inside to create key targets, characterize turning points along the course to their accomplishment and report their advancement obviously and proficiently to the proper partner (Huatuco, Montoya-Torres & Calinescu, 2013). 2.3 Need for key performance indicators in sustainable supply chain management As noted above, indicators are a successful method for bundling and passing on execution data to target client bunches. They serve to abridge huge or complex arrangements of execution related information in a reasonable quantitative or subjective structure. This recent is an essential part of indicators – as of not long ago the lion's share of indicators have been gotten from natural or budgetary parts of business, and these have loaned themselves to quantitative measures (Björklund & Forslund, 2013). On the other hand, the proceeding with improvement of indicators, especially in the social measurement, has shown that subjective measures are just as valuable as a rule, especially where effects have a bigger level of subjectivity, and can't be promptly refined down to one or more numerical measures. Basically, both quantitative and subjective indicators pass on key components of the information by abstracting from the abundance of particular point of interest (Berke & Satir, 2011). Inside of the connection of execution estimation, particular objectives shift; for instance, shortcoming determination, early cautioning, appraisal of patterns, contender benchmarking, distinguishing alternatives for development, helping outside partners in understanding and responding to execution patterns (de Brito & van der Laan, 2010) - yet all estimations of execution share the normal commence that convenient, precise and significant data on the present circumstance is an essential to accomplishing change later on. The estimation, preparing, and dispersal of data on execution can be seen, in this manner, as a fundamental criticism circle inside administration frameworks, and at last to meeting the points and destinations of feasible improvement (Björklund & Forslund, 2013). On the off chance that planned effectively, estimation can give data on the limit of the framework to convey execution and encourage intercession to change key framework parameters to enhance the conveyance of execution (Huatuco, Montoya-Torres & Calinescu, 2013). Be that as it may, it is vital to perceive the hole in the middle of indicators and a sound and viable administration framework. the unlucky deficiency of connections between the developing writing on supportable improvement and writing on corporate social, monetary and natural execution, can be crossed over through an applied and reasonable methodology utilizing the administration device of Sustainability Performance Indicators inside of a general Sustainability Performance Management System (McIntyre, Smith, Henham & Pretlove, 1998). The interest for execution estimation has various points of reference. The systems of monetary execution estimation, for instance and the outline of generally accessible, effectively open budgetary execution indicators have been consummated more than a very long while (de Brito & van der Laan, 2010; Huatuco, Montoya-Torres & Calinescu, 2013). Notwithstanding, it is vital to recognize standard "corporate financial execution indicators" (which are generally used to report inside or to shareholders and budgetary foundations) and the monetary indicators needed as a piece of measuring maintainability (Björklund & Forslund, 2013), where the more extensive financial ramifications of mining operations on the nearby, local, national and universal groups must be completely incorporated. The last indicators are inspected in more detail underneath. Further points of reference are found in the quality unrest in assembling, which set a premium on the estimation of data with respect to item quality that could then be utilized as a component of a criticism and/or nourish forward framework to conform innovative and administrative parameters of the generation procedure to oblige constant change (Björklund & Forslund, 2013; Jayaraman, Klassen & Linton, 2007). Thus, the ascent of 'in the nick of time' adaptable assembling frameworks was taking into account the accessibility and quick correspondence and digestion of item and business execution data. Both these assembling ideal models share a requirement for indicators of execution which had the capacity catch, abridge, and pass on fundamental components of plant execution without losing all sense of direction in the site-particular multifaceted nature of the plant (Lehtinen & Ahola, 2010). A few reporters have indicated the outline of execution indicators as the central methodological test in the region of ecological administration. For instance Seuring & Müller (2008), noticed that in the wake of the information blast and the quick development in the scope of systems for estimation, stockpiling, and recovery of information, there is an augmenting ocean of information at the same time, in correlation, a desert of data (Schaltegger & Burritt, 2014). Correspondingly, according to Cagnazzo, Taticchi & Brun(2010), planning natural execution indicators, the trouble is not how to quantify execution, but rather how to change over a lot of information into data as a valuable choice instrument for ecological administration. The same concern likewise applies to financial execution indicators. As far as social execution indicators, further issues emerge from the frequently subjective (furthermore more subjective) nature of the information being obtained and investigated (Cagnazzo, Taticchi & Brun, 2010). This refinement in the middle of indicators and information ought not be ignored. The evidently basic explanation that indicators (Seuring, Sarkis, Müller & Rao, 2008)are determined through handling and abstracting from crude information underscores the methodological test of pointer outline, and highlights the reality there can be numerous arrangements of indicators for passing on data to diverse client bunches (Huatuco, Montoya-Torres & Calinescu, 2013). The way to planning execution indicators for numerous client gatherings is in the first place, to guarantee that adequate, astounding information on execution is gathered and second, to outline strong and logically dependable philosophies for handling information into indicators that can be utilized as apparatuses for ecological, social and monetary administration (Schaltegger & Burritt, 2014). Various components and drivers have met to make a typical enthusiasm inside of business, general society part, and the educated community in the advancement of indicators for natural, social and monetary execution. These are audited in underneath. It is important, on the other hand, that pretty much as the monetary area has been in the vanguard of execution estimation all the more for the most part (though generally as an interior measure or for answering to shareholders), so it is additionally at the main edge of examination into the configuration of fitting indicators of natural execution for incorporating into customary budgetary assessments of danger, return, and credit value. The expectation of Greeno & Robinson (1992) almost 10 years prior is currently turning into a reality: in the same way that open organizations are measured by their budgetary results, natural execution will progressively turn into a basic element to examine. 2.4 Indicators for sustainable management A constantly expanding number of economic, social and environmental indicators are accessible. By and large, these indicators are either utilized as a part of disconnection to dissect the execution of destinations, organizations and areas as they identify with one of the three measurements, or, progressively, in blend as a method for measuring advancement towards and far from manageability. Be that as it may, the straightforward mix of sets of ecological, monetary and social execution indicators does not so much speak to the formation of indicators that are equipped for really depicting the degree to which a mining venture is contributing or cheapening manageable advancement objectives over the long haul from a between generational value viewpoint (Vachon & Klassen, 2008). Thus, while indicators permit the many-sided quality of occasions and patterns to be decreased, and all the more effectively comprehended and oversaw, there is a peril that the multiplication of indicators and diverse ways to deal with their advancement and utilization could eventually undermine their viability (Huatuco, Montoya-Torres & Calinescu, 2013). As noted earlier, indicators are frequently parceled into the three measurements – ecological, social and monetary (Vachon & Klassen, 2008) – or coordinated somehow to give a method for measuring advancement towards or far from manageability. In any case, in numerous occasions, the indicators that are utilized to survey execution in the individual measurements are indistinguishable to those used to gauge supportability, albeit in the recent case indicators from distinctive measurements are frequently considered in mix to demonstrate the positive or negative effect of execution in one measurement on execution in the remaining measurements (Svensson, 2007). Late research by Huatuco, Montoya-Torres & Calinescu (2013), has shown that enhancing ecological execution might now and again adversely affect social or financial execution, or the other way around – demonstrating that movement over the three measurements may not happen at the same rate, or even in the same course in the meantime (Vachon & Klassen, 2008). Where total of indicators from distinctive measurements is vital, information standardization, (subjective) weighting elements, or other measurable control may need to be connected. The idea of supportability or practical improvement is a mind boggling one, with numerous meanings of what is and what not feasible (Cagnazzo, Taticchi & Brun, 2010). A significant part of the verbal confrontation is about courses in which the idea can be operationalized. For clarity, the accompanying segments concentrate on the improvement of indicators in the individual measurements, in spite of the fact that the joining of indicators is additionally considered where applicable (Carter & Rogers, 2008; Vachon & Klassen, 2008). 2.4.1 Environmental conditions indicators These indicators give an evaluation of current environmental conditions at the operation (Seuring, Sarkis, Müller & Rao, 2008; Vachon & Klassen, 2008). They speak to a preview of biological community wellbeing and natural assorted qualities and can be consolidated in time arrangement to make a dynamic pointer of progress at the operation (Cagnazzo, Taticchi & Brun, 2010). Indicators may be chosen by reference to parameters for which information gathering is right now needed by environmental regulation, by discussion with partners (McIntyre, Smith, Henham & Pretlove, 1998) - and particularly those in the region of the operation - and by reference to the goals of the organization's environmental arrangement (Huatuco, Montoya-Torres & Calinescu, 2013).Key indicators of biological system wellbeing can likewise be drawn from the protection, environment, and science literary works (James, 1994). These literary works have created methods that give moderately strong indicators of biological community wellbeing in view of measures, for example, species differing qualities, conveying limit, and key species and so forth. At the point when reported as a feature of a full pointer set they give a critical method for "ground-truthing" environmental execution accomplishments related in different indicators (Carter & Rogers, 2008). Indicators ought to give an account of uncommon, undermined, imperiled, or defenseless species at the site and consolidate a depiction of the size and status of the populace (James, 1994). They ought to additionally think about measures of species differences or biological system wellbeing on restored area with that of regions neighboring the operation or on concurred control zones (Carter & Rogers, 2008; Mitchell, 1996). Different indicators that may be generally noteworthy could incorporate encompassing air quality and an examination in the middle of upwind and downwind conditions, and surrounding surface and groundwater quality, including a correlation between up angle and down inclination conditions (Cagnazzo, Taticchi & Brun, 2010; Carter & Rogers, 2008). 2.4.2 Social indicators The involvement of the public starts as an intends to illuminate and teach the affected populace and also the venture defender about the proposed activity previously, then after the fact advancement choices have been made. It ought to proceed by helping with the distinguishing proof of issues connected with the proposed tasks, and in addition the needs and estimations of the affected group. At last, given the will, it is conceivable to include the group straightforwardly in choice making and activity with the undertaking and its evaluation (Carter & Rogers, 2008). The involvement of the public and the system for management of conflict can be coordinated nearly and gainfully with the advancement of the social effect appraisal procedure. Involvement of the public and social impact assessment grew out of the same qualities (James, 1994) - that set individuals in front of economic advancement. Requests for involvement of the public reoriented social impact assessment procedure to concentrate on the human, living group, not simply information, measurements, and projections. Connor (1985) referred this as the society, or participative way to deal with social impact assessment. Nonetheless, such a methodology changes drastically in its profundity, some being concerned with just advising the group, though others really give the society the powers to make decisions (Jayaraman, Klassen & Linton, 2007). 2.4.3 Economic indicators Characteristics of economic execution and related indicators can be arranged and sub ordered in various ways. This can be, for instance, as indicated by the partners that will be essentially inspired by the marker, the monetary or non-money related nature of the pointer parameter or whether the outcomes or the determinants of a procedure are being demonstrated (Jayaraman, Klassen & Linton, 2007). A helpful purpose of section here is to consider the distinctive partner bunches that will be keen on specific sorts of marker. Economic execution indicators customarily utilized by an organization, whether in view of standard bookkeeping practices or adapted to particular circumstances of an organization, are pointed towards demonstrating execution towards the economic objectives of that organization and are consequently an instrument for choice making. Along these lines, the key partners for these sorts of indicators are the organization itself and those with a personal stake in business execution, for example, shareholders. In picking a proper scope of such organization focused execution indicators it is important to accomplish a suitable parity reflecting diverse parts of economic execution (Carter & Rogers, 2008) 3.0 Conclusion In today's focused and worldwide business environment, wherein manageability ineluctably remains in the front line in different ranges, sustainable supply chain management incorporating ecological and social viewpoints into the SCs, has increased huge acknowledgment in the corporate world furthermore supply chain management and natural writing. The reasonable administration of supply chains started by tying ecological enactments and weights forced by the clients and partners has soon willfully been acknowledged by the business world because of generous returns including expanded productivity, diminished expenses, expanded inside and outer consumer loyalty, expanded deals and piece of the pie together with a more viable danger administration. Taking after a general prologue to the theme, this study has basically gone for giving a brief audit of the writing, beginning with the starting research primarily concentrating on definitions, centrality and systems through to the latest studies, particularly those on the social parts of sustainable supply chain management, which have generally been less viewed when contrasted with the ecological and economic ones. It has been watched that the requirement for supportable applications in organizations together with their noteworthy returns have driven the scholastics to more orderly points of view coordinating supply chain management territories and every one of the three measurements of maintainability. The paper likewise puts Sustainability Performance Indicators in the more extensive connection of Sustainability Performance Management Systems, and quickly surveys alternate devices accessible for the advancement of these frameworks. It underlines that indicators can help with the real appraisal, administration and checking of effects of mining on supportable advancement objectives, and additionally the reporting of execution, on the off chance that they are produced inside of a general Sustainability Performance Management System. References Berke, J., & Satir, A. 2011. Sustainability in supply chain management: a literature review and a conceptual flow cycle. IJSSM, 3(1), 50. doi:10.1504/ijssm.2011.040779 Björklund, M., & Forslund, H. 2013. The purpose and focus of environmental performance measurement systems in logistics. Int J Productivity & Perf Mgmt, 62(3), 230-249. doi:10.1108/17410401311309168 Cagnazzo, L., Taticchi, P., & Brun, A. 2010. The role of performance measurement systems to support quality improvement initiatives at supply chain level. Int J Productivity & Perf Mgmt, 59(2), 163-185. doi:10.1108/17410401011014249 Carter, C., & Rogers, D. 2008. A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International Journal Of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387. doi:10.1108/09600030810882816 Chae, B. 2009. Developing key performance indicators for supply chain: an industry perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(6), 422-428. doi:10.1108/13598540910995192 de Brito, M., & van der Laan, E. 2010. Supply Chain Management and Sustainability: Procrastinating Integration in Mainstream Research. Sustainability, 2(4), 859-870. doi:10.3390/su2040859 Greeno, J., and Robinson, S. 1992. Rethinking corporate environmental management. Columbia Journal of World Business. Fall and Winter 222-232. Gupta, S., & Palsule-Desai, O. 2011. Sustainable supply chain management: Review and research opportunities. IIMB Management Review, 23(4), 234-245. doi:10.1016/j.iimb.2011.09.002 Hassini, E., Surti, C., & Searcy, C. 2012. A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. International Journal Of Production Economics, 140(1), 69-82. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.042 Hervani, A., Helms, M., & Sarkis, J. 2005. Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmarking, 12(4), 330-353. doi:10.1108/14635770510609015 Huatuco, L., Montoya-Torres, J., & Calinescu, N. 2013. Performance measurement of sustainable supply chains. Int J Productivity & Perf Mgmt, 62(8). doi:10.1108/ijppm-07-2013-0131 James, P. 1994. Business environmental performance measurement. Bus. Strat. Env., 3(2), 59-67. doi:10.1002/bse.3280030208 Jayaraman, V., Klassen, R., & Linton, J. 2007. Supply chain management in a sustainable environment. Journal Of Operations Management, 25(6), 1071-1074. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.016 Krause, D., Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. 2009. Special Topic Forum On Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Introduction And Reflections On The Role Of Purchasing Management. Journal Of Supply Chain Management, 45(4), 18-25. doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2009.03173.x Lehtinen, J., & Ahola, T. 2010. Is performance measurement suitable for an extended enterprise?. Int Jrnl Of Op & Prod Mnagemnt, 30(2), 181-204. doi:10.1108/01443571011018707 M. Tachizawa, E., & Yew Wong, C. 2014. Towards a theory of multi-tier sustainable supply chains: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(5/6), 643-663. doi:10.1108/scm-02-2014-0070 Mandal, S. 2013. Towards a New Framework for Sustainable Supply Chain Management. International Journal Of Manufacturing, Materials, And Mechanical Engineering, 3(3), 1-12. doi:10.4018/ijmmme.2013070101 McIntyre, K., Smith, H., Henham, A., & Pretlove, J. 1998. Environmental performance indicators for integrated supply chains: the case of Xerox Ltd. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 3(3), 149-156. doi:10.1108/13598549810230877 Mitchell, G. 1996. Problems and Fundamentals of Sustainable Development Indicators. Sust. Dev., 4(1), 1-11. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1719(199603)4:13.0.co;2-n Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. 2014. Measuring and managing sustainability performance of supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 232-241. doi:10.1108/scm-02-2014-0061 Seuring, S., & Müller, M. 2008. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699-1710. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020 Seuring, S., Sarkis, J., Müller, M., & Rao, P. 2008. Sustainability and supply chain management – An introduction to the special issue. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1545-1551. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.02.002 Svensson, G. 2007. Aspects of sustainable supply chain management (SSCM): conceptual framework and empirical example. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(4), 262-266. doi:10.1108/13598540710759781 Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. 2008. Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain. International Journal Of Production Economics, 111(2), 299-315. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.030 Vachon, S., & Mao, Z. 2008. Linking supply chain strength to sustainable development: a country-level analysis. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1552-1560. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.012 Read More