Motivation in Youth - Assignment Example

Topic: Motivation in Youth Submitted to: Submitted by: Date: Table of contents 1.1 Introduction………………………………………………… 2 1.2 The background……………………………………………… 3 1.3 Employee Motivation………………………………………... 4 1.4 The conclusion ……………………………………………….12 1.5 The Methodology……………………………………………. 13 Literature Review 1.1 Introduction: The task of a supervisor in the place of work is to get effects done through workforce. To do this the supervisor ought to be able to motivate workforce. But that is easier said than done! Motivation practice plus theory are tricky subjects, stirring on to a number of regulations. Despite of the mammoth research, essential along with functional, the theme of motivation is not clearly understood and also then badly practiced. To recognize the element of motivation all need to realize the human character itself. Also there is where the problem is. Every individual’s nature can be very undemanding and also very compound at the same time. A sympathetic and admiration of this is a requirement towards efficient worker motivation inside the place of work and as a result the efficient administration and management. (Accel, 2006) 1.2 The objectives: To identify theories models and concepts related to motivation within a workforce. To identify how young people are motivated to work. To discover how, the younger workforce feels about motivation on job by conducting primary research. The advantages and disadvantages of motivating the younger workforce. How can organizations in the highly globalized world of today, make sure that they are motivating the younger workforce enough? 1.3 Background: It almost a routine now that we get to hear all of the time from almost all our clients that, this younger generation is harder to motivate than any other they have ever had, and, the kids of today do not care about the quality or the pride of workmanship. This is gloomy and it is also sourcing a lot of problems for the employers of today. When they finish telling us their horror stories about these young workers, they always conclude with, “They only respond to threats and power.” Then when it is inquired about the turnover levels and the quality of performance in that age group. Inevitably, they realize that there is a high turnover and low performance, to which they respond how are threats and power really working for you?” We find time and time again that supervisors and bosses use their authority and exert power for all of the wrong reasons. It’s quick. They think they can get away with it. It’s what they learned from their supervisors. In reality, though, it has destructive and far reaching consequences. Supervisors too often forget or overlook the fact that resorting to power kills relationships and ultimately motivates people to become resistant to requests and reasonable expectations. Power is temporary and does not last. It even makes us look stupid. Imagine that you repeatedly catch an employee not wearing his eye protection, even though he knows perfectly well that it is required by company policy. So you lay into him: “I told you to wear your safety glasses! Put them on NOW, or else!” The employee gives in and starts wearing his safety glasses. Problem solved right? Probably not. What you don’t see is that yelling and threatening is having other, sometimes “latent” effects. When you aren’t around, the problem employee works slower, sabotage the job so that you look bad, and lowers the workgroup’s morale by complaining to his coworkers behind your back. So we are facing a dilemma. If young employees only seem to be motivated by power and managing through power leads to so many undesirable consequences, how are we to motivate our younger workers and hold them accountable? Are we simply doomed to high turnover and bad performance? (RAD Group, 2008) 1.4 Motivation As almost everyone in this contemporary world deems work motivation as the field of the behavioral sciences, the early on youth motivation thoughts were mainly the region of idea and divinity. Work Motivation All the way through the years, a variety of scholars have presented approximately 140 definitions of motivation (George & Jones, 2002), almost all of which tend to pay attention on the idea of appealing and supporting attempt toward a few preferred goal directed behavior. Debatably, the most leading work motivation frame has been Porter and Lawler's (1968) expectancy theory. Porter and Lawler (1968) documented the dealings amid the expectancy variables were more compound than what Vroom (1964) had beforehand imagined. They implied the link among the elements of effort and habit was maybe mediated by human approaching, qualities, and skill and that improved the performance power not guide to superstar fulfillment within and of itself. Just as vital, though, was their statement that the character of the task and apparent fairness of the reward also inclined character motivation. Though Porter and Lawler's model have been censured for a selection of reasons, it is one of the most extensively copy models of work motivation. The motives are countless, for one, Porter and Lawler (1968) conveyed a factual model, not only a notional assembles, of their insight of the expectancy theory model. Additionally, they incorporated lots of other variables they thought had been mislaid from earlier efforts. These variables form some secondary ideas that are still vital in the work motivation literature: self value, personality differences, function precision, task density, essential and extrinsic rewards, and alleged equity. The intricate nature of these and further variables, though, have left work motivation researchers displeased with the current state of the ability (Shamir, 1990) and still looking for a more entire model. Leonard (1999) has supplied a new master theory conceptualization supported on character course related with the self perception. The writer has turned to self-theory. The literature offers several self-based theories that attempt to explain the maintenance of the phenomenal self (Shea & Howell, 2000) in terms of individual self efficacy (Stajkovic & Luthans, 1998), self organization (Beach & Mitchell, 1990), social identity (Hogg, 2001) and positive thinking. Although a total assessment of the personality plus self theory literature is past the capacity of this literature review. (Leonard. 1999) Leadership Steers (1996) state that behavioral issues inside the place of work only cannot be studied without bearing in mind the double factors of motivation. Further, Jacobsen (2001) states it as self-evident that leaders and cohorts are an element of one unified scheme. It is also agreeable as a lot of the additional concepts formerly mentioned are complicatedly tangled inside the leader/follower connection. There is a wealth of research probing a variety of young worker behaviors and how they hit admirer motivation and performance within a range of organizational contexts (Yammering, Jolson, & Spangler, 1995). Transforming leadership is not something which can ultimately motivate the workers for sure; fairly it is a mutual association among the head plus the worker (Einstein, 1995). There is even budding data that insights of transformational leadership might be accountable by the process in which the leader behaviors are shared (Casimir, 2001). Frequently however, the literature aims only examining the leader face of this equation (Barbuto, 2000). If leadership is to be efficiently conducted into a complete work motivation model, while, the devotee feature of the relationship must be built-in as well. Barbuto (2000) has alleged a structure for appreciating follower motivation by penetrating the leader pressure from the follower's stance. He discovers the idea of power initiates. The basis being that leaders do not use power triggers to inspire the follower behaviour but as a substitute use of behaviours and communication that are read by followers and guide to sway the triggers (Barbuto, 2000). More lately, Earhart and Klein (2001) presented findings that point to young worker values and traits could be practical predictors of motivating young workers behaviors. In spirit, they stress leader behaviors considered motivating by character followers are very much determined by a follower's uniqueness and morals. Wofford (2001) concur and row that character traits, motive, and ability ought to be looked into more directly. Authors also agree and propose any effort to construct up a more comprehensive master theory of qualities motivation have got to consist of the individual personalities of leader plus followers. Personality The contemporary carry-over of the young worker motivation has mainly been character driven and all ears upon the incorporation of cognitive fact and personality differences (Heckhansen, 1991). A lot of this research, on the other hand, has also paid attention on leaders to the elimination of supporter intentions. Investigations have pointed out that definite personality formation do control the young workers behavior (Atwater, 1992; Judge & Bono, 2000) and a lot of them believe these original personality edifices to be steady (Hooijberg & Choi, 2000) . Several examining the motivational field are impending to the awareness that the young worker behaviour, and their motivation, plus the personality formation of every one are vault mutually in such a manner that no complete work motivation structure can survive distant from these three inter-reliant notions (Leonard, 1999; Wofford, 2001). 1.5 The Elements of Work Motivation ultimately, Isaac (2001) assured three matters that have got to be addressed with indication to the valence of conclusions: 1) leaders have to recognize that the magnetism of results will fluctuate with personality distinctions; 2) leaders have to support the goals of workers with those of the association; and 3) leaders have got to comprehend that the young workers requirements can revolutionize as they progress in their careers. The support upon this generic structure of expectancy theory, it does seem agreeable that an all-inclusive representation of work motivation have got to consist of the impressions and fundamentals of challenge, individual aptitude and awareness, goal focussed behaviour, inherent and extrinsic rewards, contentment, and professed equity. Concluding the main discussion at this point though fundamentally leaves a complicated rewording of Porter and Lawler's (1968) model. Follower motivational development: The vocation of Leonard (1999) has given boost to a notion of motivational expansion. The thought being that the young workers might budge through stages of motivational improvement whereby preliminary behaviors may well be provoked by easy delight but old age and knowledge may show the way that young workers to bring out assured behaviors for individual accomplishment. Even though no experimental data exists to maintain this proposal at present, the investigators believe that it has great spontaneous application such that the young workers development must be incorporated to completely symbolize individual requirements inside the work motivation procedure. As and when we are able to put together all of the theories that have been founded within the field, it is amazing to see how both the theory along with the research can help build up a model of Work motivation. Despite the fact that theories of motivation, leadership and personality have unrelenting to build up and develop, the examination of work motivation appears to be slow. An appraisal a lot of good organizational behavior workbooks (e.g., George & Jones, 2002; Luthans, 2002; Robbins, 2003) would point toward the fact there has been diffident growth ever since Porter and Lawler (1968) advanced and widened the work of Vroom (1964). The vocation of motivation literature is sated with those scholars regretting the fact that the genuine development has been weak (Shamir, 1990). During the study of younger worker motivation has without doubt improved our knowledge, theorists are starting to comprehend what we encompass is an assortment of the motivation theories with no fusing theme , that produce a theoretical mess for the researchers and uncertainty amongst the practitioners who make an attempt to pertain them to the work settings" (Leonard ,199) . Investigators today have a surplus of literature studying an inspiring arrangement of additional concepts for e.g., goal background, task complication, rewards, contentment, impartiality, etc. that are associated in several ways to the element of work motivation. To additionally confuse matters, these hypotheses have their individual literature plus are incorporated within a countless number of regulations ranging from the ever green environmental science to the contemporary social sciences along with the fragments of business management. The younger workforce motivation investigators have to deal with the annoying questions concerning the interrelationships amongst these variables (Selden & Brewer, 2000). A lot of researchers have accomplished it is expected a lot of these supplementary concepts toil mutually and that a Gestalt approach (this is a model) towards the younger worker motivation is desirable (Leonard, 1999; Selden & Brewer, 2000). Katzell and Thompson (1990) recommended researchers challenge to join together these contrasting theories into a more all-inclusive construction. Even though such a theory of work motivation has demonstrated to be indefinable (Selden & Brewer, 2000), we recommend a model we consider goes a long way on the way to budding just such a structure. The wide-ranging demonstration of how place of work behavior is thrilled, aimed at, and continuous (Steers, Porter, & Begley, 1996) within the actual world executive settings. Upon offering the model, the researchers in this field have supported the various conceptualizations by investigating the appropriate literature together with a condensed evaluation of the theoretical disintegration of motivation that has slowed down the expansion of work motivation theory. Briefly reviewing the Porter and Lawler's (1968) expectancy example by paying attention to their noteworthy offerings. The other factors that help motivate young employees: After the organizations have devoted significant time plus money employing and training the younger employees, the organization then has to decide how to guarantee that these young employees are productive and get them to stay loyal to your firm. The Retention of employees is also necessary to preserve customer relationships plus keep employing and instruction expenses in line. Letting go of a young employee almost at all times results in major expenses to the organization. The secret to young employee fulfilment and retention are established on sturdy leadership and sound organizational practices. If the organization is able to overcome these skills, the faithful employees and customers, following in development, profits and individual satisfaction. It is essential to be aware of how the young employees feel as regards their jobs is really affected by the environment in the office. Lavishness is not needed, however the office should be pleasantly painted and a pleasing place to labour. Small things like a new coat of dye plus a wallpaper frame can make a lot of difference. The young employees require someone eagerly obtainable assistance when they come across certain questions or else troubles. Assistance can be provided there and then by the manager or another senior employee. All the best organizations around the world have had one element in common which is their culture. The Profits are not the objective but are actually a result of helping cover up the requirements of both the customers as well as the employees. A performance-based compensation plan can also be put forth to support your workforce to act in means that will effect in realization of the goals of your organization, while also gathering your workers individual objectives. The organizations goals generally take in enlargement, productivity, quality service, competence, efficiency, and image and status. Several studies and reviews have recognized the fact that the money is not for all times the most important motivator for almost all the younger employees. Identifying the younger workers commonly for their fine work and they are expected to will show again the performance normally. The Praise ought to be truthful and should be spread equitably, if justified. The deficiency of an efficient communication from management is typically the supreme reason for younger employee disappointment. Also younger employees wish to exert their efforts inside an atmosphere that is enjoyable; they can get exhausted if the work environment is entirely grave and firmly business. (Charles E. McCabe, zeromillion.com) Personality Additionally, certain proportions of leader psychological category and productive thinking competence (Humphreys, 2001; Humphreys, Weygand, & Sprague, 2003) have also been revealed to manipulate the transformational leader/follower relationship. There is a certain degree of verification signifying that the constructs of psychological category along with constructive philosophy may be interconnected as well (Spirrison & Gordy, 1994). Quite a lot of investigations within the leader and young worker sphere are coming to the understanding that the leader performance, young workers motivation, in addition to the personality configuration of each one are bounced mutually in such a technique that no inclusive work motivation structure can survive apart from these three mutually dependent concepts (Leonard, 1999; Wofford, 2001). 1.5 Conclusion: Without a doubt we can conclude that motivating young workers is both easy and hard at times. Because of the various personality types that these groups contain as individuals. But what is imperative is the fact leaders also tend to play a very vital role in either motivating or de motivating the younger workers within their organizations. The organizations within this present have the need of being sure that they are able to really motivate their younger workforce, as they can rotate out to be the most fruitful ones during the long run. Motivating as well as keeping the workers needs efficient management practices with sturdy leadership skills. A superior operating system plus a sufficient training are vital. The younger employees require the right tools plus the assistance to do the job. A positive corporate culture, eventually, the overall management and leadership skills and hard work will establish the organizations victory in establishing an impression where the young employees will be motivated to be efficient moreover will stay faithful to the organization. Masllow’s and Herzberg’s theory of motivation act as guiding lines (Charles E. McCabe, 2008). 1.6 The Methodology: We will be using an amalgamation of both primary and as well as secondary data collection mode .The form of interviews will be utilized within this project, will have close ended questions , so that they can be easy to interpret while analyzing the data. Choosing the appropriate methodology is an essential as it tends to affect the conclusions drawn by the end. The sample that I have decided on is: Primary research by conducting a questionnaire and intwrviewing 6 staff members in total .three members interviewed from the BP British petroleum .it seemingly is the most appropriate method. As face to face interviews can get you the moors current thought and response to a question, they have their own set of biases. It is sometimes possible that you would not get the most accurate response, as the respondent can be in a non serious mood, angry, or just not interested in responding to any questions. These can cause serious complications in the responses that are jotted down, and so instead of ending up with the most current responses, the interviewer might just end up with a confused set of responses which would cause great hindrances in the pathway towards analyzing the data gathered. I am aware of the problems that can be caused in this case , so I will try my best to interview the respondents in a time span where I can be a bit sure that they would with all their mind and interest answer my questions . This is the reason why I have designed close ended questions. As they are also easy for the respondents to answer. The names of the respondents will be convinced. Interviews - This is the system most connected with the business or market research. The Interviews can be conducted over the telephone, face-to-face, or over the Internet.    The Interviews via Telephone: The Telephonic interviews are deemed as being perfect for gathering data from a biologically isolated sample. The interviews in this case are very prepared plus tend to be short of deepness. The Advantages are:                  These can be geologically increased. ·                     These can be established as well as carried out very plainly comparatively economically ·                     The Random samples can be preferred  The Disadvantages      of this technique are:                 The Respondents might as well simply refuse to answer a question. The interviews have got to be easier on them. There is no permission to make use of specific visual aids.           FACE-TO-FACE INTERVIEW  The Face-to-face interviews are carried out amongst the market researcher in addition to a respondent. The Data gathered by carrying out a on a survey. A few adventurers a very ‘structured’ approach and use stopped up questions which permits for data to be contrasted to very easily.  The other face-to-face interviews are more deeply involved in terms of being dependant on and depend upon open forms of questioning. The research will probe and develop points of interest. Advantages  They allow more depth·                     The Body language can emphasize responses·                     The Respondents can be ‘observed’ at the same time  The Disadvantages are: ·                     These kind of Interviews can be luxurious·                     It can take an extensive period of time to position and accomplish·                     A few of the respondents tend to offer biased comebacks when face-to-face with an investigator.   The Focus Groups A focus group is an element that contains support lent towards an encouraged group of respondents to share their opinions, approaches, feelings as well as dreams with reference to a specific topic or theme. The founding of focus groups inside a business entity can also be very practical in procuring ideas with reference to a project from inside that corporation. These Focus groups are mostly used as a contribution to the whole project design. The Advantages ·     are:                 They are rapid, inexpensive in addition to being comparatively easy to accumulate·                     They are also a nice way for the researcher to get affluent data in the respondent’s individual words along with increasing a deeper preview.                      The individuals in this case are also capable of influencing the other individual’s reaction. It is also fine for obtaining data from kids along with/or public with low levels of education. This further presents with a prospect to engross citizens within the data examination The respondents also can also carry out a series of checks on each other in order to recognize and rectify extremist views. The Disadvantages are:                    A small number of overriding focus group associates who are able to twist the sitting.                    The Focus groups have need of an accomplished and skilled mediator·                     The data which consequences from a focus group calls for skills and practice to examine The   Survey/ Questionnaire: The Survey research is a significant area of dimension in investigation that gathers precious information from the target consumer’s .These Surveys can be further sub divided into two extensive groups: the questionnaire and the meeting. The Questionnaires are more often than not paper with pencil instruments that the participants need to complete. The Interviews are finished by the interviewer supported on the participant’s idea. Whenever carrying out a survey always remember to:  1. shatter down the regions of enquiry into themes and register the questions you wish for to inquire below  every theme 2. Make certain that the questions in addition to the theme are in a reasonable order. 3. Make sure that the responses are incarcerated in a manner that can be calculated with ease. There are three fundamental kinds of questions that exist, each one with a diverse set of applications:  The Close ended ones - In this case all the responses have been defined earlier as well as may well be revealed to the respondent. These are very simple to respond to as well as swift/inexpensive to practice.  Nevertheless the minority views may perhaps be missed.  The Semi-closed - A record of responses that include options like the other. This also presents the advantages of being able to offer a closed question plus point extra elasticity if a matter has been ignored.    Open ended –These are very spur-of-the-moment observations that are composed as being the word for word and implicit throughout processing. Adds the descriptive feel to the consequences in addition to consisting of all the observations, however classy & sluggish to practice. (Wynresearch.com)   The questionnaire: Q1) what is your age? 20-30 30-40 Q2) what is your designation? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Q3) Do you like working in your organization? Yes No Q4) Please Explain why? In either of the responses above. Q5) do you feel motivated while you’re working? Yes No Q6) do you think your organization lacks the quality of motivating young employees? Yes No Q7) what do you feel as a young employee, would act as the biggest motivator? The Pay The bonuses The perks The promotion The manager’s behaviour with you as a subordinate The environment of your office The interior of your office Your team leader? The Project manager Or else ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Q8) what are the factors that act as being absolute de motivators? Q9) Please explain why? Q10) any suggestions or recommendations: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ References: The Accel team 2006, avilable at: http://accel-team.com/motivation/ accessed on the 10th of January 2009. Casimir G, 2001, Combinative aspects of leadership style: The ordering and temporal spacing of leadership behaviours. Leadership Quarterly, 12: 245-278 Einstein W .O. 1995, the challenge of leadership: A diagnostic model of transformational leadership. The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 1: 120-133 George, J.M., & Jones, G.R. 2002. Organizational Behaviour. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Hooijberg, R., & Choi, J. 2000. From selling peanuts and beer in Yankee stadium to creating a theory of transformational leadership: An interview with Bernie Bass. Leadership Quarterly, 11: 291-306. Leonard, 1999; Selden & Brewer, 2000). Leonard, N.H., Beauvis, L.L., & Scholl, R.W. 1999. Work motivation: The incorporation of self-concept-based processes. Human Relations, 52: 969-998. Wofford , 2001 (Selden & Brewer, 2000), Selden, S.C., & Brewer, G.A. 2000. Work motivation in the senior executive service: Testing the high performance cycle theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10: 531-550. Shamir, B. 1990. Calculations, values and identities: The sources of collective work motivation. Human Relations, 43: 313-332. Spirrison, C.L., & Gordy, C.C. 1994. Nonintellective intelligence and personality: Variance shared by the Constructive Thinking Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Personality Assesment, 62: 352-363. Steers, R.M., & Porter, L.W. 1991. Motivation and work behavior. New York: McGraw Hill. Yammarino, F.J., Spangler, W.D., & Bass, B.M. 1993. Transformational leadership and performance: A longitudinal investigation. Leadership Quarterly, 4:81-102 Humphreys, 2001; Humphreys, Weyant, & Sprague, 2003Humphreys, J.H. 2001. Transformational leadership and support for e-commerce: The moderating effects of leader practical intelligence. Journal of e.Commerce and Psychology, 2: 38-69. Humphreys, J.H. 2002. Transformational leader behavior, proximity, and successful services marketing. Journal of Services Marketing, 16: 487-500. Humphreys, J.H., Weyant, L.E., & Sprague, R. D. 2003. Organizational commitment: The roles of emotional and practical intellect within the leader/follower dyad. Journal of Business and Management, 9: 189-209. Isaac, R.G., Zerbe, W.J., & Pitt, D.C. 2001. Leadership and motivation: The effective application of expectancy theory. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13:212-226. Lowe, K.B., Kroeck, K.G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. 1996. Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7: 385-425 Jacobsen, C. 2001. Dynamics of charismatic leadership: A process theory, simulation model, and tests. Leadership Quarterly, 12:75-112. Wofford, J.C., Whittington, J.L, & Goodwin, V.L. 2001. Follower motive patterns as situational moderators for transformational leadership effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13: 196-21 The Pros and cons of primary research techniques, 2008, Wynresearch.com avilable at: http://www.stridingout.co.uk/how-to-do-your-market-research-/primary-research-techniques-pros-and-cons.html Acessed on the 10th of January 2009. Yin RK case study: design and methods Second Edition, proceeding of the 12th international conference on Info systems 1991. Hakim, 2000 Hakim Catherine title : Research Design successful designs for social and Economic research Published London Routledge , 2000 2nd Edition Carter McNamara, MBA, PHD Authencity Consulting LLc, Copyright 1997-2008, Adapted from the Field guide to Non Profit Programmer design, Marketing and Evaluation and field Guide to consulting and organizational development. Fisher M. Nijkamp P. (1993), Geographic Information Systems, Spatial Modelling and Policy Evaluation, Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 280 p. Volume comprising background articles with a specific. Read More