Business Ethics: The between Weber and the Kaiser - Case Study Example

of The case between Weber and the Kaiser steel processing company displays the instance of imbalance in the availability of job opportunities and allocations. The facts of the business also give the information about the company favoring whites in former programs. The whites do not have enough qualifications, but they attain the jobs that need skills to operate. The claim by Weber is after the company does a consequent format of favoring the blacks in a training procedure. The case provides different happenings that create a Klink in various incidents that follow. The case also expresses different claims by Weber, who was a worker in the company for a decade. The following article gives a comprehensive account of the case. The instance is courtesy of the facts that the script puts forward. The other scenario is the case of the illustrating the case under different constructs. The use of the construct is in a bid to analyze the situation in more details for the comprehension of the case. The article also gives a reflective perspective that is as per each theory that guides on the different aspects of making decisions. A conclusion is also a composition of the text in a manner to establish a personal view of the case. The conclusion also gives the instance that constitutes the best theory that helps in the analysis of the data. A reference list is available at the completion of the text to authenticate the propositions therein. Introduction The case between Kaisers versus Weber is a very interesting. The case involves the Kaiser steel company that has its offices in gramercy, Louisiana (Velasquez). The company came into being in 1958. After almost a decade of its operations, the various reports concerning the ratio of employment in the company were of much imbalance. The reports were federal reports and thus very reliable in the findings that they put forward. The imbalance was because only about two percent of the total employments had blacks in their possessions (Antoinette). One time, the company, tends to pick a group of whites and gives higher working positions to them. The instance was despite the fact that there were no blacks in the group. Furthermore, the whites who were the constituents of the group did not have enough qualifications that would make the whites standout from the whole population of employees (Velasquez). A federal report on the operations of the company put forward that the company was giving whites a promotion to higher ranks despite them not having any experience. The action led to an increase in the number of whites with skills. The number of the blacks in positions of expertise and those of semi skills was about four point five percent (Velasquez). On the other hand, the blacks were mostly laborers. The number of blacks in the unskilled jobs was almost equal to the whites in the same occupation. The instance was possible after the policy of 1968 to hire the same number of workers from both the white and black races. The Kaiser Company was receiving a lot of pressure from federal institutions to correct the imbalances that were in the employment docket. The instance led to the establishment of a training program. The program was in a bid to increase the numbers of black workers in the skilled positions of the company (Velasquez). The instance was also to include a fifty sharing of opportunities between the blacks and the whites. The circumstances that would follow would see the selection of seven black Americans and six whites. Brian Weber a worker of the company for ten years was not lucky enough to join the training program. After investigating the reasons as to why he did not make in the shortlist, he found cases of favor in the selection. He discovered that he had more experience more than two of the blacks who had made to the shortlist (Velasquez). The other aspect was that forty-three other whites had more experience than he did, and they did not make it to the list. Weber also found out that no one of the blacks who were to attend the training had prior experience. The aspect was thus discrimination in the perspective of Brain (Velasquez). Utilitarianism The theory is a component of normative ethics. The theory is anthropocentric in nature. The theory depicts that the best action to take is the one that minimizes the total consequences and maximizes the full benefits. The method also gives the merits to the actions that tend to increase the happiness of the majority (Antoinette). The theory, therefore, evaluates the relevance of the measures against the nature of the outcomes. If an act is to bear positive results, then the theory puts forward that the law is a good one. On the contrary, any act that tends to exhibit impacts that are more negative to the majority of the people is not the right action to take. In accordance with the theory, an adverse decision or action that tends to maximize the welfare of a broader group in the society is a good choice in nature. An affirmative act to an individual that tends to raise the total sufferings of the greater population is not a wise decision to make (Martin). In accordance with the theory of Utilitarianism, the best step to take in the training program should ensure that the majority of the people benefit. In the perspective of the Kaiser company, the aim of the training program was to ease off the pressure that was emanating from outside sources on the imbalances ion the employment opportunities. However, the training program could not exclusively train the blacks alone since the issue would not create harmony as put forward by the utilitarianism construct. The issue of Brian did in fact create an aspect of discrimination. However, the act was in line with the general plan of increasing the blacks in the senior posts. The aspect rules out the possible discrimination that Weber experiences through the denial of the training program. As a result, the instance is a justification of the act by the steel company. Rights Rights are the principles that tend to govern what people should owe to the humans. Rights, therefore, are rules that are normative in nature. The rights tend to have legal foundations that coincide with the values of the society and the cultural norms. Rights are mandatory, and every human has his or her rights (Siobhan). The aspect thus means that every individual despite his background should have equal chances with his or her counterparts. In accordance with the case of Brian Weber, the construct of the rights of an individual tends to be in his favor. The rights of a person tend to put forward that there should be equality of opportunities for all humans. The equality should be in all aspects of life. According to Weber, he had a more qualification than the experience of all the black employees and thus had a higher right to attain a position in the training program (Aurora). The instance has a different perspective. The theory of rights requires that special focus should be prevalent towards the particular groups in society. The training program of the steel company was with the intention to create a balance of the rights that the blacks and the whites were sharing in the job opportunities. In view of the elimination of Weber, the company was wrong to deny the right to an equal chance for an opportunity. On the other hand, the company was good in creating the instance since it was in an attempt to increase the balance of opportunities in the employment scene. Justice Justice depicts the establishment of the act that is just as well as the discussions that tend to be philosophical in the search of the just. The outcome of the just is in a bid to establish the best consequences that will be fair for conflicting parties. In the egalitarian though, justice prevails where there are instances of equality (Correspondence). In the utilitarian approach, truth conveys the reduction of the negative impact of the majority. The theorists of the rights of property argue that the acts of justice tend to influence an increase in the economic performance of all the stakeholders. The theorists in the social contracts put forward that justices envisage the situation whereby there is the agreement of all parties that seeks justice, therefore, aims to improve the welfare of the community. Justice focuses on the reward of great works and the punishment of wrong acts. The corrections of various situations that lead to unjust occurrences also constitute the broad phrase of justice (Conferences). In view of the judicial construct and the different opinions of the various theorists, the Kaiser steel company did do justice. The reason is that the inclusion of Weber in the training program would not make any corrections in the imbalance of the employment opportunities. In fact, the case would lead to the other forty-three employees demanding their right to join the training program. The instance would not create a harmony among the outside factors, the employees and the company itself. The case would create an increase in the pressure from outside on the grounds of discrimination. The case of Weber was thus a correct decision by the Kaiser institution. Caring The construct of caring puts forward that care relates to the acts that exhibit empathy and feelings of concern for other persons. The theory, therefore, requires that every person should have a considerate approach especially in the making of decisions (Cary). The aspect intends to create equality from an individual level to a more general level. Care, therefore, expresses the elimination of any instances that may cause a lack of coherence in a society (Eith Thilo K.). In the case of Weber, the act of care does not present itself in a clear manner. is not so apparent .The reason is that the company did not express empathy to Brian because of the time that he has been providing services to the enterprise. Brian thus has contentment that the business did not represent care for the acts. On the other hand, the issue of Brian depicts him as a person who does not show concern to the black fraternity that provides labor to the company at a lower level than his level. The instance resonates that the enterprise is more caring despite the care being a result of the pressure from the federal and other sources. The company was ensuring that the available resources should have an equal distribution of the races. In accordance with the theory of caring, the company has a justification for barring Weber from the training program. The reason is that it was expressing empathy for the black Americans who had scanty opportunities in the employment opportunities in the company. Virtue A virtue is an excellence in morality. In simpler terms, a virtue is an act that is positive in nature and is correspondingly acceptable on moral grounds. The attributes of an action tend to have definite principles and good moral foundations (Roger). A virtue thus conforms to the humans realities that are widely acceptable throughout the globe. Virtues, therefore, create both collective and individual greatness in the view of a more happy society (Aaron). In light of the case of Weber, he has the attributes that tend to create a good person to attain the post for training. The sole reason is that he has been in the company for a decade. From another perspective, the issue that the Kaiser steel company propagates does not spell individual greatness for Weber. However, the act of barring Weber from attending the training program would reduce the chances of more acts of dealing with the other forty-three whites who had more experience than he did. The law is most probably a virtue since it ensures the general employment balance of the whites and the blacks in the institution. Conclusion The only way to comprehend the case of Weber is to know the prior circumstances that led to the setting up of the training program by the steel company. The program would entail the action that would ensure the equality between the races. The pressure was emanating from the federal government and other national bodies that were in the aim of making the changes in the instruction (Velasquez). Weber, on the other hand, has no knowledge of the objective of the training program. It is very probable for him to search the reason as to why he did not excel in the training program. Therefore, there is no wrong ion finding out what the circumstances that led to his failure. The worst mistake that the steel company did was the lack of a concise format of communication. From a contrary perspective, Weber was ignorant of the activities that were taking place with the advent of his employment. He was part of the firm that had imbalances, and he did not acknowledge the instance. The best construct that helps analyzes the whole case is the utilitarian theory. The method is simple to understand, and the various triggers to a particular action are evident (Cary). The instance also provides a best-case scenario of the case of Weber. The theory explains that the effects that particular entity takes are dependent on the outcomes that it brings forth. The theory thus gives the grounds that heavily suit the case of Weber. The theory also gives direct link to attach to every meaning that the case of the steel company versus Weber entails. Another theory that was equally useful was the instance of justice. The theory of justice provides that the existence of truth is only possible where there is equality. The construct of justice also has different views from numerous theorists who give a concise view of the theory (Correspondence). The instance provides an excellent reference to the case of Weber. The analysis of the case against the frame that justice creates gives numerous grounds to justify the acts of the Kaiser steel company. The most probable usefulness of the case is in the creation of insight on the reasons that lead to various actions. Some actions do not have to be positive if at all they are to prevent a more general problem of the whole group of people. One can also conclude that Weber does not appreciate his position and is thus blind to the broader of the facts of the case. The script also helps in knowing the importance of assessing a particular scenario before making any judgments concerning the same (Cary). An example of Weber is in the instance whereby he does not consider the issues of the case before claiming the matters of reverse discrimination. However, the most important aspect to learn is that outside forces that do not emanate within a business environment can greatly induce on the decisions that a particular firm makes. Works Cited Aaron, Stalnaker. "VIRTUE AS MASTERY IN EARLY CONFUCIANISM." Journal of Religious Ethics 38.3 (2010): 404-428. Antoinette, Baujard. "Utilitarianism And Anti-Utilitarianism." SSRN Journal (n.d.). Aurora, Plomer. "The Human Rights Paradox: Intellectual Property Rights And Rights Of Access To Science." Human Rights Quarterly 35.1 (2013): 143-175. Cary, Brown. "Perceived Injustice In Injured Workers: Analysis Of Public Responses To An Injured Worker Who Took Workers’ Compensation Board Employees Hostage." Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 26.3 (2012): 569-578. "Conferences." Science & Justice 47.1 (2007): 42. "Correspondence." Science & Justice 46.3 (2006): 199. Eith Thilo K., Harald Stummer and Claudia Schusterschitz. "Career Success Perception And Work-Related Behaviour Of Employees In Geriatric Care - A Pilot Study In A German Geriatric Care Facility." Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 25.1 (2011): 45-52. Martin, Peterson. "PANDEMIC INFLUENZA AND UTILITARIANISM." Bioethics 25.5 (2010): 290-291. Roger, Crisp. "VIRTUE ETHICS AND VIRTUE EPISTEMOLOGY." Metaphilosophy 41.1-2 (2010): 22-40. Siobhan, Mullaly. "Debating Reproductive Rights In Ireland." Human Rights Quarterly 27.1 (2005): 78-104. Velasquez, Manuel G. Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases (7th Edition) . Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, July 4, 2011. Read More