The Viability and Feasibility of the Coronary Investment Company - Book Report/Review Example

The Viability and Feasibility of the Coronary Investment Company 1. Introduction The Coronary Investment company is in the process of choosing a land for building their premises thereby they would need a suitable development project that suits the operations. The preparation of the development appraisal is significant since it helps in identifying the proper uses of the identified land while also ensuring that development incorporates the intensions of the clients. The company has prepared a development appraisal of establishing its premises in Southernsby in order to help in proper placement of the locations. This article functions in reviewing the viability and the feasibility of the prepared appraisal in relation to the situation of the business (Ashworth & Hogg, 2000, p. 46). The article also constitutes a sensitivity analysis, which discovers the appropriate capital needed to support the siting. Further, the article also presents the calculation of the yield value besides discussing its importance for the development appraisal of the Coronary Investment. 2. The viability and feasibility of the appraisal 2.1 Ability of securing funds The development appraisal for the Coronary investment proves viable to the extent of being used by the company during the development. The appraisal presents a company, which is able to secure funds for the company especially when looking at the projected cost in relation to the capital value of the company. Securing funds for a company is always the hope of every entrepreneur. This means that a viable appraisal should constitute elements showing the capability of achieving suitable profit for the company. Consequently, in the event of analyzing the viability and the feasibility of an appraisal there is need to consider whether it puts the company in a state of securing its funds. The total estimated value is £24, 639, 675 as compared to the capital value of £33,140,000 meaning the development appraisal indicates a project, which will earn profit for the company. The difference is over £ 9, 000, 000 meaning the company would be in a position to cater for every operation in the event of construction and the subsequent letting. This implies that the appraisal prepares the Coronary Investment for a project that would see it securing its funds. A profitable company should always have the cost of its operation being low than its capital value as evidenced in the development appraisal. The project includes all the elements that might influence the revenue of the company in the course of purchasing the land. The development appraisal has also included all the costs, which the company will have to spend in the process of constructions. The identification of the estimated costs for the project is important since it helps the company to put up right measures of meeting the required cost without running out of cash. 2.2 Determination of the capital value Besides, the appraisal has also included the capital value of the company as per the time. The determination of the capital value is significant for the assurance of the capability of the company carrying out the project without shortages. However, a proposal, which does not project achievement of a profit, will lead the subject company into witnessing losses in their operation. Some of the elements included in the appraisal include inflation until tender, inflation to midpoint in costruction programme. The consideration of inflation is important for proper planning. it makes the company be in a position of planning for their expenses with the consideration of forthcoming inflation. The development appraisal has estimated the amount of inflation until tender as $260000 meaning the company would have to adjust their spending into meeting meeting the loss resulting from the expected inflation. The development appraisal goes further into considering inflation amidst the construction in the land implying it has constituted any possible occurrences, which might affect the funds of the company. The inclusion of the ancillary costs also served in making the development appraisal viable and feasible for the company. Even though, the company may not be solely enjoying from the access roads, it is important that it include it in its project. The potential customers, who would like to lease or rent will always consider whether the building has an access to good roads. The inclusion of ancilliary costs ensures that the company has included all the projects that would attract the potential customers. Landscaping and car parking also forms an important part of the company’s project as included in the development appraisal. 2.3 Consideration of the third parties Further, the development appraisal also considers the parties, outside the company, who may be having direct influence on the operation of the company. For instance, the appraisal has included the interest of the developers as part of the project. The developers are important in the event of the construction otherwise the project would fail. This means that the viability of a project would incorporate the interests of the developers. The inclusion of the developers’ profit ensures that the company maintains puts the individuals in their expenses thereby ensuring a good relationship with them (Aswathappa & Dash, 2008, p.56). Further, the development appraisal indicates a 15% of the whole profit for the developers, meaning it highly considers the efforts of the developers. 2.4 Incorporation of cost Another consideration that makes the appraisal viable is the incorporation of cost. The consideration of cost should constitute the planning obligation costs that always forms part of a larger cost. The development appraisal constitutes the accessed value for the land, which is important in studying the appropriate value for the whole plot to be purchased. Accessing the value is significant in the appraisal especially when there is need for ensuring the presence of an appropriate site value. Further, the consideration of the appropriate site value serves for both the company and their expected clients. The company will only enjoy from their investments when they attract more client into renting and buying their buildings. Further, the inclusion of the accessed value in the appraisal also contributes to the feasilibility and viability because it helps the company to access the market risk of buying the land. Being enlightened about the market risk makes the company able to control their adjusted return from the investment. This ensures that the company can manage its resources while delivering the aims of the project. Consequently, the preparation of the development appraisal has the ability to make the company achieve its aim of obtaining a profit from purchasing the site in the centre of Southernsby (Henry, 2003). 2.5 Set back of the development appraisal However, the set back of the development appraisal is that it does not consider the exact revenue that the company should get from construction on the land. For instance, the development appraisal does not include the possibility of rental yield in the project. This seems like setting less weighty goals for the company. A viable appraisal should maximize the profit that the company should expect through ensuring that it has exhausted all the available opportunities. The construction of a building should always go one in one with rental yield since many clients would always prefer rental rather than buying (Balchin et al, 1988, p. 56). Renting always occur in the regions where there are middle and low-income earners who do not have enough capital for purchasing the spaces. This implies that any investment company, operating in construction for selling, should always set some space for rental yield since it maximizes the resulting profit. The development appraisal should have included the project of the rental yield since it forms part of the investment. The absence of the rental yield means that this would not be proper project for the company since it may lead into improper planning. 3.Sensitivity analysis APPRAISAL Assessed Value £ Income: Car Park 160 public spaces say 310,000 40 reserved office spaces say 90,000 Public areas no rental yield Kiosks 2@ say £10,000 20,000 Atrium Cafes 1@ say £20,000 20,000 Shops 3700m2 @ £210/m2 777,000 Offices 2400m2 @ £175/m2 420,000 Total Income £1,637,000 Yield @ 5% = yp 20 (years purchase) 20 x £1,657,000 = £33,140,000 (Capital Value) Estimated Costs Demolition & treatment of land 1,200,000 Build Costs: 3,900m2 shops (shell & core) @ £650 average costs 2,535,000 correct 2,600m2 offices @ £1400, 3, 640, 000 Public areas 1400m2 @ £1975 2,765,000 Lifts (no escalators) 117,942 Ancillary Costs Access roads, ramps, car parking, landscaping, services etc 1,200,000 Professional fees Architect, Quantity Surveyor, Structural Engineer 1,263,050 Contingencies Say 5% of costs of construction 631,525 Inflation until tender Say 260,000 Inflation to mid point in construction programme 700,000 Finance Short term finance (construction period) 900,000 Short term finance (letting period) 410,000 Letting and sales fees 200,000 Marketing and advertising 83,000 17098075 Developers profit @ 15% 3,761,600 Land cost (estimate) 3,100,000 Finance and fees on land purchase 680,000 Total estimated costs 24,639,675 3.1 Change in inflation 700000 – 260000 = 440, 000 (440000/260000)*100 = 169% This represents an increase of 440, 000 on the initial investment as regarded by the project. For the short term finance Construction period = 900000 Letting period = 410, 000 The change = 900000 – 410000 = 490000 This represents a decrease by 490000 on the initial investment as regarded by the project 3.2 Calculating NPV at different discounts Without a discounting the following is the NPV of the project NPV = Benefits – costs £32,740,000 - 24,639,675 = 8, 100, 325 This means that without a discount, the company would be enjoying a NPV of 8, 100, 325 With a discount rate of 5%, the NPV of the project will be: 15% of 32,740,000 32, 740, 000 – 4911000 = 27829000 NPV = 27829000 - 24,639,675 = 3189325 When calculating with a discount rate of 10% 10% of 32,740,000 = 3314000 33,140,000 – 3314000 = 29466000 29466000 - 24,639,675 = 5186325 = 4826325 Sensitivity analysis graph Effects of changing variable on Profit       Variable in £ -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 Income from shops and offices 2,581,803 3,950,803 5,319,803 6,688,803 8,069,803 9,426,803 10,795,803 Developers Profit 9,461,456 8,537,238 7,613,020 6,688,803 5,764,585 3,916,150 4,840,368 Construction Cost Shops 7,223,747 7,045,432 6,867,118 6,688,803 6,510,488 6,332,173 6,153,859 Construction Cost Offices 7,387,777 7,154,786 6,921,794 6,688,804 6,455,811 5,989,818 6,222,820 Inflation 6,942,175 6,773,260 6,857,718 6,688,803 6,604,345 6,519,888 6,435,430   Effects of changing variable on Profit       Variable in % -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 Income from shops and offices -61.40% -40.93% -20.47% 0.00% 20.65% 40.93% 61.40% Developers Profit 41.45% 27.63% 13.82% - -13.82% -27.63% -41.45% Construction Cost Shops 8.00% 5.33% 2.67% - -2.67% -5.33% -8.00% Construction Cost Offices 10.45% 6.97% 3.48% - -3.48% -6.97% -10.45% Inflation 3.79% 2.53% 1.26% - -1.26% -2.53% -3.79% 4. Importance of the yield value The yield value is the important aspect in the preparation of any development appraisal. It helps in making successful the intensions of constructing building for occupation while also ensuring that the company is at a position to enjoy profits. The final value, regarded as the yield value makes the company to prepare adequately for the operations of establishing a building. The following are some of the calculations and the analysis showing the importance of the yield value to the company. Getting the yield value involves getting the NPV of the project, which is the difference between the total estimated cost and the capital value. The NPV calculation involves calculation of the difference with consideration of the different discount values in order to realize the economic justifications of the project. The calculations below show the importance of yield value in determining the extent to which the company should go when including discounting in renting and leasing. Without a discounting the following is the NPV of the project NPV = Benefits – costs £32,740,000 - 24,639,675 = 8, 100, 325 This means that without a discount, the company would be enjoying a NPV of 8, 100, 325 With a discount rate of 5%, the NPV of the project will be: 15% of 32,740,000 32, 740, 000 – 4911000 = 27829000 NPV = 27829000 - 24,639,675 = 3189325 When calculating with a discount rate of 10% 10% of 32,740,000 = 3314000 33,140,000 – 3314000 = 29466000 29466000 - 24,639,675 = 5186325 = 4826325 The outcome of the three NPV calculations shows a trend which is useful for the company in the event of determining whether it should carry on with the project of not. The yield value serves in giving an indication on whether the company would be able to construct and let the houses without shortages. In the calculations, the NPV of the project is 8, 100, 325 without discounting, 4826325 with 10% discounting and 3189325 with 15% discounting. This shows that without discounting justifies the carrying on of the process since it presents a higher NPV value for the project. Further, 10% discounting also justifies the project to carry on despite being at lower NPV value than without discounting. However, 15% discounting presents the lowest value meaning it only brings slight justification for the project to carry on. 4.1 Determining the success of the project The above calculations shows that the yield value, produced by the development appraisal, without discounting shows that the company should continue with the project since it assures of a higher NPV value. Any addition on the discounting will lead to the decrease in the NPV value thereby discouraging the Coronary Investment from carrying on with the project. The increase in the discount rate, as shown in the calculation would indicate that the project should not go ahead since it is unviable. However, if there is need for including discount, which might be the case in areas where the company would like to increase its attraction, the company can go for atmost 10% discounting since it still assures of a positive NPV. Consequently, the calculation of the yield value at different discounting allows the company to determine whether there is a chance of applying a discount without the project failing. Further, the calculation leads the company into determining the viability and the feasibility of the project in achieving the stated goals. The project developers can determine the best discount rate through plotting the various NPV, at different discount rates, in order to arrive at a break-even discount rate. The break-even discount rate occurs at the point where the NPV is zero (Preece, 2009). 4.2 Determining value of the project The final yield value also helps in determining the value of the whole process in relation to the amount of capital that the company have at the time. The estimated costs constitutes all the costs that the business would have to settle for, while the capital value constitutes the amount of capital the company have towards achieving the process. Further, the yield value is important in making important decisions especially on whether to add some number of workers without affecting the operation. Through studying the yield value, the company is in a state of determining the additional developers it would need for the construction process. The yield value also makes the company to adjust on unnecessary spending in order to meet the most important needs of the company. For instance, if the company realizes that the yield value is too small for supporting the available activities, it can reduce on the amount of developer’s profit and the ancilliary costs. Further, the yield value is best representation of the related risk analysis that the Coronary Investment may have to go through during the project. Consequently, it makes the company to prepare adequately for putting up with the risks. Information about the related risks also allows the company to identify factors that have direct influence on the decision making process. 5. Conclusion A viable appraisal should maximize the profit that the company should expect through ensuring that it has exhausted all the available opportunities. The construction of a building should always go one in one with rental yield since many clients would always prefer rental rather than buying. Renting always occur in the regions where there are middle and low-income earners who do not have enough capital for purchasing the spaces. This implies that any investment company, operating in construction for selling, should always set some space for rental yield since it maximizes the resulting profit. The development appraisal should have included the project of the rental yield since it forms part of the investment. The absence of the rental yield means that this would not be proper project for the company since it may lead into improper planning. The final yield value also helps in determining the value of the whole process in relation to the amount of capital that the company have at the time. The estimated costs constitutes all the costs that the business would have to settle for, while the capital value constitutes the amount of capital the company have towards achieving the process. Further, the yield value is important in making important decisions especially on whether to add some number of workers without affecting the operation. Through studying the yield value, the company is in a state of determining the additional developers it would need for the construction process. The yield value also makes the company to adjust on unnecessary spending in order to meet the most important needs of the company. For instance, if the company realizes that the yield value is too small for supporting the available activities, it can reduce on the amount of developer’s profit and the ancilliary costs. Further, the yield value is best representation of the related risk analysis that the Coronary Investment may have to go through during the project. Consequently, it makes the company to prepare adequately for putting up with the risks. Information about the related risks also allows the company to identify factors that have direct influence on the decision making process. 6. Bibliography Ashworth A., Hogg K. (2000) Added Value in Design and Construction Longman. Essex Balchin P, Kieve J, Bull G, (1988) Urban Land Economics and Public Policy, Macmillan  Baum A, Crosby N. (2008) Property Investment Appraisal 3rd Edition Blackwell. Oxford Ferry D, Brandon P. (1999) Cost planning of Buildings 7th Ed Blackwell Science. Oxford Guy, S, & Henneberry, J (2006) Development & Developers Perspectives on Property. Blackwell, Oxford. Havard, ., (2005), Contemporary Property Development, RIBA Enterprises  HMSO Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 Millington A.,F (2000) Property Development. Estates Gazette. London Reiess G, (2007) Project Management Demystified .3rd Ed, Taylor Francis Rougvie A, (1987) Project Evaluation & Development, Batsford  Sayce, S, Smith, J, Cooper, R and Venmore-Rowland, P (2006). Real Estate Appraisal: From Value to Worth, Blackwell Publishing. Oxford. Syms P. (2002) Land, Development & Design. Blackwell Science. Oxford  ASWATHAPPA, K. (2005). Human resource and personnel management: text and cases. New Delhi, Tata McGraw-Hill. ASWATHAPPA, K., & DASH, S. (2008). International human resource management: text and cases. New Delhi, Tata McGraw-Hill Pub. Blainey, Geoffrey. 2006. A history of Victoria. Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge University Press. Blainey, Geoffrey. 2010. A game of our own: The Origins of Australian Football.[Sydney]:Read How You Want/Accessible. BRYSON, J. M. (2011). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: a guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass. Comeford, R., & Callaghan, d. (2011). Environmental, industry, and internal analysis. London: Prentice Hall. Connely, D. (2010). Strategy for Internal Environment. Power point presentation. Fellows et al (1990) Construction Management in Design & Construction, E & F Spon FERRELL, O. C., & HARTLINE, M. D. (2008). Marketing strategy. Mason, OH, Thomson South-Western. GRIFFIN, R. W. (2012). Fundamentals of management. Mason, OH, South-Western Cengage Learning. GRIFFIN, R. W. (2012). Fundamentals of management. Mason, OH, South-Western Cengage Learning. Henry, A. (2007). The Internal Environment of an Organization. London: Oxford University Press. INGRAM, S. R. (2011). Successful strategic planning: 10 things you absolutely must know before hiring a consultant to prepare a strategic plan for your business. Chicago, Jourdan & Brown Pub. Kanniyakonil, S. (2007). The fundamentals of bioethics: Legal perspectives and ethical approaches. Kottayam: Oriental Institute of Religious Studies, India, Dept. of Publications. Lawton, K. (2006). Swot analysis: A management Strategic Success Tool. New York: LIENTZ, B. P. (2010). Breakthrough strategic IT and process planning. Hackensack, NJ, World Scientific. Macintyre, Stuart, and Anna Clark. 2004. The history wars. Carlton: Melbourne University Press. Preece, D. (2009). Organizations and technical change: strategy, objectives and involvement. London, Routledge. Samaddar, R. 2008. Workers and automation: the impact of new technology in the newspaper industry. New Delhi u.a, Sage. Skinner, W., & Chakraborty, K. 2008. The impact of new technology: people and organizations in service industries. New York, Pergamon Pr. SMIT, P. J. (2007). Management principles: a contemporary edition for Africa. Cape Town, South Africa, Juta. Spain B. (2006) First Stage Estimating Handbook 2nd Ed. Taylor Francis. London The Chartered Institute of Building (2009) Code of Practice for Project Management for Construction and Development 4th Edition Blackwell Oxford. Wyatt, Peter (2007) Property valuation : in an economic context Blackwell. Oxford Zahorsky, D. (2009). A business owner's Secret Weapon: Swot analysis. New Jersey: Mc Graw Hill. Manne, Robert. 2003. Whitewash: on Keith Windschuttle's 'Fabrication of Aboriginal history'. Melbourne: Black Inc Agenda. Graves, Adrian. 1983. "THE OTHER SIDE OF THE FRONTIER (Book)." Ethnic & Racial Studies 6, no. 1: 125. International Security & Counter Terrorism Reference Center, EBSCOhost (accessed September 23, 2012). Rolls, Mitchell, and Murray Johnson. 2011. Historical dictionary of Australian Aborigines. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press. Arjomand, Said Amir, and Edward A. Tiryakian. 2004. Rethinking Civilizational Analysis. London [u.a.]: SAGE Publ. Windschuttle, Keith. 2003. The fabrication of Aboriginal history. Sydney: Macleay Press. Manne, Robert. 2003. Whitewash: on Keith Windschuttle's 'Fabrication of Aboriginal history'. Melbourne: Black Inc Agenda. Read More