Reading Summary of whistleblowing and professional responsibility - Book Report/Review Example

Whistleblowing and Professional Responsibility: A Summary Whistleblowing and Professional Responsibility: A Summary Introduction In the given work of“Whistleblowing and Professional Responsibility” (Bok, 1980), there has been a thorough discussion of the responsibilities of the whistleblower, reasons for whistleblowing and the potential consequences and concerns that might arise due to the act. I am impressed by the article and agree with the writer as she highlights the stakes of whistleblowing and the ins and outs of the act.

What is Whistleblowing?Whistleblowing itself is an alarm that is caused within the work environment in order to spotlight the abuses or neglects within the organization that might be a threat to the interest of the public. Whistleblowing is related with dissent, accusation and breach of loyalty. The whistleblower is seen as an exposure of a confidential matter to the public, which might sound like the blower pointing fingers or accusing the authority.Statement of Morality?However, whistleblowing is in actual a statement of morality.

The whistleblower believes something is wrong in the organization, and thus take it upon himself to inform the public and alert them as he believes it is morally right to stand up against the wrong doing. Whistleblowing helps protect the welfare of the public and can be seen as a sign of selflessness and moral codes. By standing up against the wrong, whistleblowers can also question their superiors for their puzzling motives.Precautions to be taken before WhistleblowingBefore a whistleblower decides to carry out the act, he should consult his loved ones as well as expert advice first and foremost.

Before breaking ranks, he should test the waters by working within the system and seeking support from co-workers. Moreover, he should make the move only after he is completely sure that there is wrong going on in the department.ConclusionAll in all, whistleblowing is justified only if there is a specific risk and the whistleblower believes the organization cannot do anything about it. It is unjustified if it is done in error, concerns private matters or is done out of revenge.ReferencesBok, S. (1980). Whistleblowing and Professional Responsibility.

New York University Education Quarterly, 11(4), 2-10.