Oil for Food Scandal - Essay Example

The support of life after the war is a social responsibility of the United Nations but the actions of the international organization and the Australian Wheat Board led to ethical issues. The involvement in corruption and war to support the Iraqi government in the build-up to the desert storm and the Second World War was a major dilemma for the international community. It led to the confusion in action taken by the international government.

The dilemma in the case was whether to support the current government or to enter into war with the challenge of supporting society after the event. In conclusion, the challenge was on both AWB and oil protocol. Who are the main stakeholders and what are each of their primary interests? The main stakeholders in the case study are the Iraqi government and the international community including the US and Australia. Likewise, the primary interest of Australia was to obtain oil while offering food support to help in the recovery of war-torn Iraq after Iraqithe desert storm.

The primary interest of the Iraq government led by Saddam Hussein focused on the protection of personal interest and development of the weapons of mass destruction. What theoretical frameworks or models that you are aware of so far in this course might apply to this situation? The ethical framework theories such as teleological ethics can apply to the situation because it is based on the result of the action. For instance, the food for oil, program's main aim was to ensure the Iraqis do not die of hunger after operation desert storm which leads to the loss of food reserves.

However, the result of the program was massive corruption making the idea wrong based on the teleological ethics theory. The consequence of the approach of the makes it wrong approach in Iraq because of massive corruption and the strengthening of the incumbent government which later stocked itself with banned weapons including biological weapons of mass destruction. Utilitarianism ethical theory focuses on the greatest benefit to the greatest number of people. For instance, the attack on Iraq because of the existence of biological weapons was considered the best option because it would benefit the whole world.

Therefore, the theory supports the invasion of Iraq by the international community. What actions or decisions would be likely to yield the most ethical and socially responsible outcome(s)? The decision to open a case against the eleven executive members of the AWB board is the end product of an unethical approach to problem-solving the Iraq case. The best approach was to ensure that the Iraqi government pays for the goods and services provided instead of working on the Oil for Food strategy which failed miserably and led to the empowerment of the incumbent government.

A good strategy in solving strategy ensures that the locals benefit and not the government officials. Additional comments The dilemma in the case relates to the current world because of the challenges affecting individuals' dailyю