Analysis of Ford and Firestone Case - Essay Example

In this study, the stakeholders are the consumers, their stake is the security of the Firestone tires fitted in their ford explorer tracks. These companies do not care about their customers, it was noted that there were tires that were believed to be faulty and were supposed to be examined for safety only to be later passed as good for use under unclear circumstances. The Ford company also stated that it was an issue with the tires and that they had insisted on low pressure on these tires. The pressure recommended by Firestone and Ford on these tires differed. Both the Ford and the Firestone Company are not responsible in social ways as they differ on this issue of the recommended tires pressure, in addition, instead of solving the issue at hand, all they do comprises pointing fingers at each other thus putting the consumer at a higher risk (Case 24 687).

The Firestone name has ruined its reputation, and so is the Ford trucks, the number of lives lost in this accident is not something to go away easily. Firestone has the responsibility of paying for that money as they replaced these tires with their funds, however, it would be much more important to find a solution to this type/of truck issue as the safety of human beings cannot be compensated with money.

Currently, the Ford trucks have changed their tires from Firestone, however, the vehicles keep on rolling on most occasions, therefore one cannot put all the blame on the Firestone tors in these incidences (Case 24 688).