Student's Post Week 1 - Research Paper Example

post week 1. Discussion Response to Gloria’s post I have read your post and I believe that an alternative approach to the discussion would be appropriate. The post required an exploration of personal knowledge regarding the United States and international business operations and environment and your post should have discusses business operations and environments in the United States and those in international set ups with the aim of identifying either similarities or differences. Your post should have therefore involved features of business operations and environments in both set ups to explore culture, applicable currencies and laws, and even communication.

Your post does not however seem to identify or compare characteristics of the practices and environments (Dlabay, Scott and Scott, 2010). I therefore think that you did not identify the exact objective of the discussion. #2. Discussion 1: Response to Edeyln’s postI like your post’s concept about the United States’ reliance on foreign human resource. You also identify the concept of wage difference that encourages people to emigrate from their native countries into the United States for better wages.

Based on your concepts, I identify two business environments that distinguish the United States from the international set up. The health care business environment in the United States lacks sufficient human resource for service delivery while its remuneration rates are relatively higher than rates in some segments of the international set up and this offers the nation a comparative advantage towards attracting human resource. Your experience therefore identifies sufficient knowledge of business operations and environment in both the United States and the international set up (Marber, 2007; Dlabay, Scott and Scott, 2010).#3. Discussion 2: Response to Edmoina’s postYour proposed strategy to reconciling the different and contradictory views on globalization is valid, though it does not seem to be comprehensive.

Researching on the views will only develop another knowledge base without significant impacts on the existing positions. This identifies the need for further initiatives and efforts for merging the views because of their respective opposition to each other. Reconciliation would also require a credible and analytical approach to merging the different opinions. I therefore believe that key parties to the different positions should be involved in the knowledge development and their hard lines determined before exploring long term and wide scoped impacts of globalization.

The approach is likely to develop a central position but you only responded to one section of the discussion question (Maidment, 2007; Carbaugh, 2010). #4. Discussion 2: Response to Kenisha’s postI like your organized approach to the discussion that identified each part and responded to them separately. Your post does not however identify a strategy for reconciling the different and contradictory views on globalization. While you only described one of the views, I believe that researching on diversified views and seeking to establish rationale behind the views is one of the approaches to reconciling the existing differences (Carbaugh, 2010).

I also believe that your opinion on the opposing arguments on globalization is also not comprehensive because you have not identified the arguments that oppose and those that support globalization. You could have for example identified availability of cheap imports and variety of commodities, and high wage rates in export zones as some of the arguments for globalization and threatened employment opportunities and lost expertise to foreign countries as some of the best argument against globalization (Carbaugh, 2010).

I however concur with your opinion about the future of globalization that is bound to succeed because of the developed trend and realized benefits (Marber, 2007). ReferencesCarbaugh, R. (2010). International economics. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning. Dlabay, L., Scott, J. and Scott, J. (2010). International business. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning. Maidment, F. (2007).The leading economic organizations at the beginning of the 21st century. In International business (14th ed., pp. 13-16). Dubuque, IA: McGraw-Hill Contemporary Learning Services.Marber, P. (2007).

Globalization and its contents. International business (14th ed., pp. 2-7). Dubuque, IA: McGraw-Hill Contemporary Learning Services.