Globalisation as an Unstoppable Force - Research Paper Example

? Globalisation Introduction Globalisation is a term that is used to refer to the accumulation of processes by which people in the world are incorporated into a single society that is known as the global society (Milward, 2003). In essence, globalisation is a powerful real aspect with regard to the new world system, where it signifies one of the most prominent forces that assist in determining the future course of the world. Moreover, globalisation has various dimensions that assist in the process of making the world a single society. These dimensions include economic, political, security, environment, and health social, cultural among others. Globalisation was coined in 1980’s but the concept is an ancient one that has a dissimilar significance to most people (Hansen et al, 2010). Apparently, scholars, policy makers and activist see it as a force that could be used to advance the economy in the world while others view the concept as a danger to the economic systems in the world. In light of view of globalisation as the concept that is relevant to the world economy, there is a remarkable increase in worldwide trade and exchanges through increasingly open, integrated and borderless international economy. Besides, remarkable growth has be noted in trade and exchange not only in traditional and international trade of commodities and services, but also in currency exchanges, in capital activities, transfer of technology, movement of people through international travelling and migration, over and above, the flow of information and ideas internationally (Ku?ng, 1998) Globalisation as an Unstoppable Force Globalisation has continually become an unstoppable force especially now when it has opened a golden chance for business, commerce and trade (Dervis and Altinay, 2011). In fact, never before in the history of the world has there emerged such a situation where many goods have been sold to many people in the easiest way as is happening currently. Moreover, the presence of information and communication has enabled everyone to access everything anywhere. In regard to this, markets are continually becoming global, numerous corporations are richer and powerful as compared to some countries. Of importance to note, is that there is a combination of reduced trade barrier, financial liberalisation, over and above, a technological revolt that has totally changed the environment of business in most of the industrialized countries. According to Boesak (2009), globalisation has promised more trade, more market, more business, and more information among other issues. This has been demonstrated through the considerable wealth that has continuously been brought by the tide of globalisation. Why does the World need a Global Set of Ethic rules and What would They be? A global ethic can be described as an ethical perspective which incorporates significant ethical relations between states, between individuals who live in different societies. In the ethic, there are claims with regard to the existence of some universal values and norms concerning obligations that have global scope (Chatterjee, 2011). Consequently, global ethics is a concept that entails ethical inquiry into the nature and explanation of the values and norms that are global. Simply, it articulates various issues that have risen in the recent past such as international aid, security, environmental problems, intervention and human rights. Never the less, scholars interested with global ethics argue that it is not possible of the global ethics to be accepted by the world over to make a single society. Needless to mention, global ethics are crucial and should be accepted as they arguably promote the global goals (Hutchings, 2010). In the event that some global ethics are not embraced by a considerable number of agents, the intended goals are not likely to be attained. Apparently, there can be diverse global ethics and diverse understanding of the goals. Some global ethics are likely to be doing well than others. Kolak 2004 argues that, the role of global ethics is that none of them in regard to fulfilling human needs and attaining security, sustainable development, and conservation is likely to occur successfully without mutual restraint and cooperation that are based on moral norms in an ordinary setting. The needs of human beings, social economic and technological progress are meant to occur everywhere. Essentially, it is the global environment that requires protection as it is parallel to global security and global security development. It is worth noting that the achievement of these goals have three major challenges that include non- violation, coordination and positive intervention. In relation to this, a country can involve the violation of interest in regard to another country thus bring in the implicitly of the three challenges (O’Byrne and Eade, 2005) In terms of achieving many global common goals, it is crucial that states globally practise cooperation and coordination in areas such as peace and security, environmental regulations or the transfer of technology. Moreover, positive intervention may be necessarily especially state governments are not in a position to handle natural and human made evils effectively. Simply, these three respondents towards global challenges will only occur when there is a commitment to global goals as ethical requirement or acceptance of global responsibility. According to Okeja (2012), even though diverse motivations are used in these policies, it cannot be ignored that ethical norm apply in these domains and acceptance by relevant actors who are concerned with global ethical norms that plays a significant role in motivating the said behaviour. This concept is applicable at the level of states and that of individuals. States or its actors like the politicians, diplomats and civil servants are expected to act in an ethical framed work particularly in analysing the rightness of foreign policy. Similarly, various global ethical frameworks that are necessarily in the realization of goals incorporate individual or a grouped of individuals such as businesses and companies. In general, the manner in which government pursue such goals is a practise that is regarded to as morally important by it citizens. At the individual level, resources and goals greatly contribute to the encouragement of cooperation internationally, over and above, assisting those who have various challenges through aid agencies. Hence, global goals require a global ethic and anyone must accept that global goals must incorporate global ethic in scope and conception (Preston, 2007). According to global ethic, human needs are the vital needs that ought to be an object to ethical attention. Although the lives of animals have relevance, human beings carry a more significant impact and are mostly seem as object of international commitment. In essence, revolve around human beings because they constitute the world. To begin with, human beings need the basic needs such as food, health, clothing, shelter and the basic security include the needs that are met universally and cannot be disputed by anyone (Brock, 1998). None the less, there is a broader range of intellectual, social, cultural and spiritual needs. Moreover, human beings need autonomy, freedom or choice to be able to handle various issues of life in a proper manner. In reality, needs revolve around human beings, as different individual have a different interpretation of what needs are. There also exists a relationship between needs and wealth. According to Preston (2007), while some people are satisfied through the realisation of needs, others want to accumulated more wealth for other own sake. In light of this, the centring international commitment particularly needs, is that it cover up a reason for substantial conflict through a namely conflict with regard to the specificity of that goal. It is worth noting that, global ethics that pertain to many other people is not open ended as would be argued. This is because a particular vision of life that is good, moral norms and the social order that works hand in hand with it with regard to global ethics (Boldt, 2011). Proponents of global ethics argue that it is not a new ideology or super structure. This means that it is not in a position of making specific ethics in terms of religions and philosophy. For instance, the global ethic cannot be set on biasness in favour of religion, culture or any other aspect of life. It must be set without discrimination because it entails human responsibility. In fact, it would be termed ridiculous to consider Global ethic as a replacement of Torah, the Qur’an or other aspects (Dean, 2004). Moreover, proponents argue that global ethic is a necessary minimum of common values, and standards that have a relation to binding values, irreversible standards and moral attitudes. This issue is confirmed by all the religions despite having different theological perspective that are supported by none believers. Through this agreement of values it is easy to overcome the crisis of orientation, which has become a real global problem. Conversely, the opponents of global ethic argue that this concept is a project that needs more than a decade to be fulfilled, a process that calls for the consciousness, which has by now made progress especially in the last decade (Britz and Capurro, 2010). Furthermore, the proponents have incorporated the declaration of human responsibilities that has continuously supported and reinforces the declaration of human right from an ethical perspective. In the declaration, they have argued that there must be full acceptance of the dignity of all people their freedom and equality. However, it is important to note that the legal validity of human rights does not depend on the actual realisation of responsibilities. The right of human beings cannot be considered a reward of good behaviour as argues by the opponents (Milward, 2003). Proponents of global ethic argue that human beings need a new way of thin king and acting at the global level with regard to the 21st century. They emphasize that, human beings should treat each other with respect, conduct business in an ethical way, over and above, laying focus on extreme purpose and meaning rather than focusing on profit alone. Moreover, they should take account of the impact on the coming generations in ensuring that they make a positive contribution to the world (Dean, 2004). The increase rate witnessed through complexities and interconnections in relation to the 21st century compels human beings to think and act globally as it is no longer enough to act local and think global. In order to embrace a new global ethic, there must be a new perception of the world, institutions, and relationships among other things. Furthermore, the perception recognizes that human beings cannot exist in isolation, even though they are individuals, nations or institutions. The wrangle between proponents and opponents of global ethics has influence the supporters of global ethics to come up with a number of elements puts more emphasize on the impact of global ethics. Sustainable Apparently, when human beings focus on the environment, it is highly likely that they tend to lose the wider dimension of sustainability. Thus, an ethic of sustainability includes talent sustainability, organization sustainability, and social sustainability and global sustainability. According to Dervis and Altinay (2011), talent of sustainability goes beyond retention, attraction and development that are bound to come up with environments and practise that enhance a longer human life. Organizational sustainability takes note of a corporation as part of a society system that is wider, and the long term good depends on the successful financial enterprise that has a positive impact on a societal system that is wider. Additionally, social sustainability recognizes that every human being is a part of social network at three consecutive levels; local and national and global level. For instance, businesses that operate through a new global ethic assess the impact of the actions and decisions they make in all set of human relationship with much care on the contributions they make. Timeless Human Values Apparently, this element is associated with a set of ethical values that are globally accepted as they add to societal wellbeing with the inclusion of fairness, honesty, and respect for human life among other virtues. In essence, most long term business success depends on practising these values as they are termed very crucial. In fact, business and people who purely operate on a new global ethic engage themselves in interaction with other people to gain information of several issues that act as elements of a global society. It is only through these interactions that there is more understanding on reality and more insight on the validity of action of human beings (Chatterjee, 2011). Whole Systems Thinking A new global ethic through system thinking acknowledges that both human beings and businesses cannot exist in isolation, but as part of large system which compels their minds o thinks even though the consequences attached to them might be negative and short lived. For instance, in regard to environment people may consume water for their sake, and forget the responsibility that they hold for other human begins. Of importance to note is, since businesses do not exist in isolation from a societal system that is wide, decision made and action taken translate to far reaching consequences that go beyond business and moment. O’Byrne and Eade (2005) argue that each part of the system tends to run ethically, expects appreciation from the larger interconnected system to avoid negative impacts on the other aspects that are related to global ethics. Simply, leaders operating by the use of a new global ethic that has these and other elements need to develop their awareness and consciousness of the world, culture, nations and businesses. Conclusion Globalisation is a term that is used to refer to the accumulation of processes by which people in the world are incorporated into a single society that is known as the global society. It was coined in 1980’s but the concept is an ancient one that has a different meaning to different people. Globalisation has continually become an unstoppable force especially now when it has opened a golden chance for business, commerce and trade. Of importance to note, is that there is a combination of reduced trade barrier, financial liberalisation, over and above, a technological revolution that has completely transformed the environment of business in most of the industrialized countries. A global ethic can be described as an ethical perspective, which incorporates significant ethical relations between states, between individuals who live in different societies. In the ethic, there are claims with regard to the existence of some universal values and norms concerning obligations that have global scope. Kolak (2004) argues that, the role of global ethics is that none of them in regard to fulfilling human needs and attaining security, sustainable development, and conservation is likely to occur successfully without mutual restraint and cooperation that are based on moral norms in an ordinary setting. According to global ethic, human needs are the vital needs that ought to be an object to ethical attention. Although the lives of animals have relevance, human beings carry a more significant impact and are mostly seem as object of international commitment. Proponents of global ethics argue that it is not a new ideology or super structure. Furthermore, the proponents have incorporated the declaration of human responsibilities that has continuously supported and reinforces the declaration of human right from an ethical perspective. Thus, leaders operating by the use of a new global ethic that has these and other elements need to develop their awareness and consciousness of the world, culture, nations and businesses. Bibliography Boesak, A., 2009. Globalisation: The Politics of Empire, Justice and the Life of Faith. Stellenbosch, South Africa: SUN Press. Boldt, M., 2011. A Quest for Humanity: The Good Society in A Global World. Toronto; Buffalo: University of Toronto Press Britz, J. and Capurro, R. 2010. Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics, 7, 3:28-36. Brock, G., 1998. Necessary goods: our responsibilities to meet others' needs. Lanham [u.a.]: Rowman & Littlefield. Chatterjee, D., 2011. Encyclopaedia Of Global Justice. Dordrecht [etc.] : Springer, cop. Dean, H., 2004. The Ethics of Welfare: Human Rights, Dependency and Responsibility. Bristol Policy Press. Dervis, K. and Altinay, H., 2011. Global Civics: Responsibilities and Rights In An Interdependent World. Washington: Brookings Institution Press. Hansen. et al.,2010. Globalisation, Volume II: Global Crisis, Global Challenge, Global Faith : An Ongoing Response To The Accra Confession. Stellenbosch, South Africa: SUN Press. Hutchings, K., 2010. Global Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity. Kolak, D., 2004. I Am You: The Metaphysical Foundations For Global Ethics. Dordrecht; Norwell, MA: Springer. Ku?ng, H., 1998. A Global Ethic for Global Politics and Economics. New York: Oxford University Press. Milward, B., 2003. Globalisation? : Internationalisation and Monopoly Capitalism: Historical Processes and Capitalist Dynamism. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Pub. O'Byrne, D. and Eade, J., 2005. Global ethics and civil society. Aldershot, Hampshire [u.a.]: Ashgate. Okeja, U., 2012. Normative Justification of A Global Ethic: A Perspective From African Philosophy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Book. Preston, N., 2007. Understanding Ethics. Annandale, N.S.W.: Federation Press. Read More