The Impact of using New Technology in Art Exhibitions - Essay Example

This is followed by a thorough analysis of the various expert viewpoints regarding several issues, such as whether online exhibition seems likely to replace traditional exhibition completely. These viewpoints are extracted from different kinds of literature. For the artistic viewpoint, the research has used ‘Ways of Seeing’ and ‘Management and the Arts’, whereas, management books help elaborate the business viewpoint. 1. Traditional Exhibition: Scientific and technological advancement has dynamically altered the traditional exhibition industry, bringing innovative technology into performance art, as is present in the London Design Museum.

This has enhanced the ability of artistic techniques to express and generate emotion and has also made the use of network form more efficient. Experts also write about how technological changes have affected the viewership and appreciation of the relevant art forms and their exhibitions. Technology has enabled a whole new segment of visitors to visit these art exhibitions and museums to appreciate the work. These audiences are those present worldwide, who can now appreciate the art by visiting online galleries of these museums (Camp, MacFadden, and Mercer, 2000).

Thus, the visitors are no longer limited to physical visits to the institutions. Their visits are no longer contingent on their geographical location, but simply on their passion and interest in art. Furthermore, technology has made it possible to sort out and cater to each of these virtual visitors individually, based on their educational backgrounds, ages, and interests. This helps museums further achieve their goals of educating the public with the various lessons that art has to offer and expanding their minds to further enable them to understand the depths of each piece of art.

Thus, with this technological aid, museums are able to enrich the experience they provide to their visitors (Perlin 1998). Another relevant insight that the available literature had to offer was about the “Contaminated Cultural Materials in Museum Collections” workshop that the Arizona State Museum at the University of Arizona in Tuscon held. The planning and implementation were sponsored by a NAPGRA grant, and the event took place from March 16th to 18th in 2000 (Odegaard & Sadongei, 2005).

The workshop was held for representatives of the twenty-one American Indian tribes in Arizona, aiming to discuss the features and quantity of chemical contamination present on tribal cultural material that the museum possesses. Following this, it aimed to explain the need for using such poisons on the materials. This was accompanied by a brief overview of the health risks, which are potentially attached to preserving and restoring a functional object in order to display to a community. Finally, the workshop aimed to circulate the clearinghouse information pertaining to medical referrals as well as toxicologists, chemical hygienists, and other such health experts (Odegaard and Sadongei, p xi, 2005).

Conclusion The workshop highlighted some important facts that need attention when museums and tribes plan to collaborate in the restoration of objects before sending them back to their place of origin. It shed light on the importance of communication in this ordeal. It is the museum's responsibility to actively communicate all issues during consultations and to keep the tribes informed during the whole process. The chances of uncovering a serious health issue of pesticide contamination are very slight, but the occurrence of such an issue can have serious implications.