Punitive damages are essential in the society since they promote justice and prevent any harm in the society. This paper will provide the connotation that punitive damages promote justice in the society while tort reform hurts the society. It will provide extensive research and cases to support this connotation…
Download file to see previous pages...
Exemplary or Punitive damages are financial damages given to a claimant in a personal civil action and evaluated against a defendant established to be responsible for deliberately infringing the rights of the plaintiff. However, many people confuse punitive damages with compensatory damages. The major difference is that the awarding of punitive damages can only occur after a judge has established that a defendant is accountable for a claimant’s injuries and has set a suitable compensatory award. Moreover, punitive damages are given to a claimant, and are evaluated against a defendant, not counting and excluding compensatory damages. In addition, the awarding of punitive damages can only be successful in occasions where the injury inflicted to the claimant was the anticipated and likely effect of the defendant’s actions.” Moreover, the awarding of punitive damages only occurs in cases where the actions of the defendant are of an adequately egregious nature. Another aspect of punitive damages is that in theory, many people view them as an amazing solution.
The major aim of awarding punitive damages is prevent defendants and others from practicing similar behavior. However, large companies constantly pressurize policymakers to put a cap or restrict on punitive damage awards. This is because they deem that punitive damages incur heavy costs. Conversely, imposing limitations on punitive damages would reduce their effectiveness and deem their purpose insignificant. (Sayas, 2011). In addition, punitive damages are a community solution for a community wrong. In this regard, punitive damages are state-inflicted charges for disruptive behavior, safeguarding the public inflicting charges on producers for their deliberate, blatant unconcern to human safety (Pace, 1997). Moreover, punitive damages have a monetary effect that not only obtains the notice of the defendant for perverse behavior, but also to cause the whole business to concentrate on the harm caused and take remedial action (Boulton, 2004). Although there is an extensive reporting of cases relating to multi-million dollar punitive damage awards, the truth is that judges are not hurriedly awarding these damages. This implies that there is no extensive awarding of punitive damages though they are significant in the society. According to a research by an Institute for Civil Justice, punitive damages occur in below 4 percent of all judges decisions. The major reason for this is that there is no awarding of punitive damages except that the claimant clearly illustrates that the defendant meant to harm the claimant, or knew that claimant was likely to experience harm, but intentionally ignored that risk (Sayas, 2011). There are numerous forms of torts, but regarding tort reform, the two major areas of concentration are medical malpractice and products liability. Medical malpractice is a law section that holds medical experts responsible for damage caused by their behavior after they do not conform to sensible principles. On the other hand, products liability is the section of law that normally holds firms accountable for releasing unreasonably risky products on the market (Boulton, 2004). In the 1980s, the tort reform movement started to build up a more lasting institutionalized method to advocate for reform. Not amazingly, there have been extensive arguments concerning the objectives
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Punitive Damages Promotes Justice while Tort Reform Hurts Society Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/business/1390842-punitive-damages-promote-justice-and-that-tort
(Punitive Damages Promotes Justice While Tort Reform Hurts Society Research Paper)
“Punitive Damages Promotes Justice While Tort Reform Hurts Society Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/business/1390842-punitive-damages-promote-justice-and-that-tort.
Insurance companies have made strong lobbying for fixing cap on the award of punitive damages under tort laws. As of 2005, 45 out of 50 states in the USA pursued cap on punitive damages or more realistic evidence to prove it. Under Arizona state constitution articles XVIII, § 6 , the privilege to initiate action to recover damages for harm shall never be abolished, and the quantum recovered shall not be subject to legal cap.
This paper tends to evaluate some various opinions on this issue; and finally makes a better conclusion of its own. To begin with, the bill according to critics like Lisa Rickard, the president of the U. S. Chamber of Commerce’s Institute for Legal Reform would only help plaintiff’s lawyers to opt-out the programs they do not like.
Tort proceedings and legislation is intended to mitigate the injured party against damages and to act as a deterrent against such commissions occurring in the future. Health care and medical practitioners have also been subjects of tort proceedings involving their clients.
American Gangster (2007), directed by Ridley Scott, explores Frank Lucas’ life and the factors that contributed to his development as a criminal gang lord. After Bumpy Johnson died from a heart attack, Frank, his former driver and confidante, took over the business and made radical changes in its structure and operations, although the basic principles of honesty, community service, and truthfulness to the clients remained.
There are four different elements of negligence tort; duty of care was to be exercised by the defendant, the defendant acted against the duty to care, the tort case filer experienced loss due to breach of that duty and there was actual or proximate cause and effect relationship between the losses experienced by the plaintiff and the unintentional harm caused by the defendant (Del, 1995, p.442).
This is because most tort reformers have argued that the current American tort system is unfair to all parties and is currently out of control, particularly for the defendants. Their contention has been that the current system has very many frivolous lawsuits, runaway juries, and plaintiff’s attorney who behave in unethical manners.
Tort law plays a fundamental role in healthcare delivery services .It encompasses a number of key areas within the healthcare system. These include negligence, intentional torts and infliction of mental torts. Torts have a direct impact on a healthcare institution through these three areas.
The tort reform policies specifically focus on personal injury common law rules. However, tort reform has been yet another incessant political debate in the United States in the recent years. Although the proposed reform aims to reduce tort litigation or damages, it has raised multiple responses across the country for and against the proposal.
However, one of the deciding factors of all what happened in that century was an ideology called “Fascism”. This idea was brought forward by Adolf Hitler who contributed to the growth of Germany economically and militarily and eventually started Second World War.
It is evident that in what we call justice, two wrong things make the right. This paper would discuss the competing paradigms of punitive “net widening” policies and restorative justices.
In the system that we have now, a crime
1 Pages(250 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Punitive Damages Promotes Justice while Tort Reform Hurts Society for FREE!