Nobody downloaded yet

Punitive Damages Promotes Justice while Tort Reform Hurts Society - Research Paper Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
Punitive damages are essential in the society since they promote justice and prevent any harm in the society. This paper will provide the connotation that punitive damages promote justice in the society while tort reform hurts the society. It will provide extensive research and cases to support this connotation…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.9% of users find it useful
Punitive Damages Promotes Justice while Tort Reform Hurts Society
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Punitive Damages Promotes Justice while Tort Reform Hurts Society"

Download file to see previous pages Exemplary or Punitive damages are financial damages given to a claimant in a personal civil action and evaluated against a defendant established to be responsible for deliberately infringing the rights of the plaintiff. However, many people confuse punitive damages with compensatory damages. The major difference is that the awarding of punitive damages can only occur after a judge has established that a defendant is accountable for a claimant’s injuries and has set a suitable compensatory award. Moreover, punitive damages are given to a claimant, and are evaluated against a defendant, not counting and excluding compensatory damages. In addition, the awarding of punitive damages can only be successful in occasions where the injury inflicted to the claimant was the anticipated and likely effect of the defendant’s actions.” Moreover, the awarding of punitive damages only occurs in cases where the actions of the defendant are of an adequately egregious nature. Another aspect of punitive damages is that in theory, many people view them as an amazing solution.
The major aim of awarding punitive damages is prevent defendants and others from practicing similar behavior. However, large companies constantly pressurize policymakers to put a cap or restrict on punitive damage awards. This is because they deem that punitive damages incur heavy costs. Conversely, imposing limitations on punitive damages would reduce their effectiveness and deem their purpose insignificant. (Sayas, 2011). In addition, punitive damages are a community solution for a community wrong. In this regard, punitive damages are state-inflicted charges for disruptive behavior, safeguarding the public inflicting charges on producers for their deliberate, blatant unconcern to human safety (Pace, 1997). Moreover, punitive damages have a monetary effect that not only obtains the notice of the defendant for perverse behavior, but also to cause the whole business to concentrate on the harm caused and take remedial action (Boulton, 2004). Although there is an extensive reporting of cases relating to multi-million dollar punitive damage awards, the truth is that judges are not hurriedly awarding these damages. This implies that there is no extensive awarding of punitive damages though they are significant in the society. According to a research by an Institute for Civil Justice, punitive damages occur in below 4 percent of all judges decisions. The major reason for this is that there is no awarding of punitive damages except that the claimant clearly illustrates that the defendant meant to harm the claimant, or knew that claimant was likely to experience harm, but intentionally ignored that risk (Sayas, 2011). There are numerous forms of torts, but regarding tort reform, the two major areas of concentration are medical malpractice and products liability. Medical malpractice is a law section that holds medical experts responsible for damage caused by their behavior after they do not conform to sensible principles. On the other hand, products liability is the section of law that normally holds firms accountable for releasing unreasonably risky products on the market (Boulton, 2004). In the 1980s, the tort reform movement started to build up a more lasting institutionalized method to advocate for reform. Not amazingly, there have been extensive arguments concerning the objectives ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Punitive Damages Promotes Justice while Tort Reform Hurts Society Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved de
(Punitive Damages Promotes Justice While Tort Reform Hurts Society Research Paper)
“Punitive Damages Promotes Justice While Tort Reform Hurts Society Research Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
treutelgilbert added comment 10 months ago
Student rated this paper as
I never thought 4500 words essay could be written in such a free manner. I loved the background of this essay. Will definitely use it for my own work!

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Punitive Damages Promotes Justice while Tort Reform Hurts Society

Claims for Damages Arising from the Tort of Negligence

...? Claims for Damages Arising from the Tort of Negligence In law, any person who has suffered loss or injury has a likelihood of receiving compensation from making a claim of that loss or injury if it can be proved that the loss or injury suffered was partly or wholly as a result of negligent omissions or commissions of certain acts (s) of another party or person. The compensation is aimed at not necessarily making up fully for what had happened to the person but rather to enable the injured party move on with his/her life with less difficulty.1 If appropriate, claims should be made for damages that arise from a given situation. In the UK, there is legislative provision governing personal...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay

Tort Reform

...? Debate on Tort Reform Assignment) Debate on Tort Reform Tort reform has been yet another hot button issue for political debate in the United States for the recent years. Although the objective of the reform proposed was to reduce Tort litigation or damages in healthcare industry, it has raised multiple responses for and against the plan across the nation. This paper tends to evaluate some various opinions on this issue; and finally makes a better conclusion of its own. To begin with, the bill according to critics like Lisa Rickard, the president of the U. S. Chamber of Commerce’s...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Tort reform for the health insurance industry

.... This results in an increase in the cost of the insurance providers. ( As a result of these hidden factors the parties involved in the insurance coverage, which includes the insured as well as the insurance provider often gets exploited by such undue costs. It is with this aim that the US government has brought about the Tort reform, so as to ensure that the interests of both the parties are safeguarded and at the same time justice is meted out to them in the medical field. ( Through the introduction of the Tort reform the physicians are brought under a strict control and they are always kept under the scanner, since the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Punitive Law

...?Controversial issues: Punitive damages Punitive damages is a very strong of debate and is conventionally looked at as one of the most controversial issues that call for alteration in the policies for better or worse. The status of punitive damages as fair, effective, excessive, constitutional and generous is frequently challenged. United States of America is one country in which punitive damages are given quite frequently and more freely. The punitive damages have made a significant contribution in the “litigation happy” cultural perception of the civil suit. Nevertheless, punitive damages promote justice in the society by means of assisting companies in making safe products for the customers, establishing a punishment function... ...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Tort Reform

...? Tort Reform Impact of Tort Reform on Health Care A tort is defined as a civil wrong which would be substantial as to bring a suit in a court of law. For an offence to be a tort, it has to have resulted into injury or harm upon the injured party. Tort proceedings and legislation is intended to mitigate the injured party against damages and to act as a deterrent against such commissions occurring in the future. Health care and medical practitioners have also been subjects of tort proceedings involving their clients. A tort proceeding in health care is usually intended to...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Health Sciences - Tort Reform

... the practice (Buchbinder, &Shanks, 2007). The state of California adopted a tort reform measures at around the 1970’s in response to the increase in costs of medical malpractice insurance. The state imposed caps on the plaintiff’s/victims compensation for those damages that are non economic (they are difficult to quantify). California also placed limits to the contingency fee of attorneys. In particular, the state of California limited the non economic damages in lawsuits of medical malpractice to $ 250,000. The state additionally limits attorney’s contingency fees in the cases of medical malpractice in the following form. For the first $ 50,000 a contingency fee of 40% is charged, for the next $ 50,000, a 33.33% fee is charged... ?...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Tort Reform in the USA

...: Springer. Dobbs, L. (2005). Tort reform important to U.S. future. CNN US. Retrieved from Eddins, S & Greenstone. (2009). What is Tort Reform? Global Legal Resources. Retrieved from Jordan, A. (2011). Tort reform hurts citizens. The Falcon. 83 (22). Retrieved from  Tort ReformTort reform is a policy developed to make changes to common law civil justice systems for the purpose of minimizing tort litigation or...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Mental Damages

...from collecting from some kind of nervous shock or psychiatric injury. Further, another case that establishes that primary victims may recover for nervous shock, if they are in danger of being injured, is Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310. Therefore, even though the two children were not hurt physically, they may recover damages for their nervous shock. The basic elements of negligence thus established, the next part of the analysis will center upon the liability of the New Horizons, who would be vicariously liable if it is established that there is a master-servant relationship between Maria and them, and if it can be shown that Maria was carrying out her duties as a...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Tort Reform in the United States

...Tort Reform in the United States Tort reform refers to the wished-for alterations within the common law systems that are meant to lessen tort damages. Tort activities refer to public claims of the common law which were created in the English Commonwealth structure. These actions were meant to acts as compensation for those who have been affected. Tort system actually deals with those who have hurt others, making them compensate the victims especially through money. Losses involved with this may include income loss experienced when an individual is recovering, payment for the pain,...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Punitive vs. Restorative Justice Policies in American Criminal Justice

...Punitive vs. Restorative Justice Policies in American Criminal Justice Lex Taliones, eye for an eye, the principle of retributive justice which indicates specific punishments for specific crimes. According to the code, the punishment should be equal to that of the crime. When you do this, justice is attained. Justice is a broad and complex concept where we try to find equilibrium to an event. It is evident that in what we call justice, two wrong things make the right. This paper would discuss the competing paradigms of punitive “net widening” policies and restorative justices. In the...
1 Pages(250 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Punitive Damages Promotes Justice while Tort Reform Hurts Society for FREE!

Contact Us