Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/biology/1611197-review
https://studentshare.org/biology/1611197-review.
Review The presentation provided a clear understanding of the topic, as the topic is covered in a concisely manner using adequate illustrated images with each step involved in the process discussed. Hence it can be ranked 4 due to the level of clarity of the chosen material to describe each aspect of the described process. Each slide has been appropriately utilized in delivering the information thus can be said that each slide contains the necessary amount of information required for the topic considered.
The graphics are appropriately utilized for the clarification of the topic. The material can be covered in a 40 minute presentation. The best part of the presentation is the overall sequential flow of information that provides the details of step-wise progression of the chosen process. Although being a good presentation, it can be further enhanced by adding one more slide for providing an overview of the topic before going into details. Moreover in order to capture more attention appropriate design layout or theme may be chosen as well as a bit of animation may be utilized to increase the focus on the main idea presented in each slide.
Such as from the given design themes any of the theme that enhance the attraction of the presented information may be chosen such as those themes providing a dark background and bold information depiction. The best of the presentation is the slide 17 titled as “oxidative phosphorylation” that is explained by using an appropriate image providing detail of each aspect mentioned in the image (Conjecture Corporation).Works CitedConjecture Corporation. “What is Constructive Criticism?” Wise Geek. 2012. Web. 7th Dec. 2012.
Read More