Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/biology/1479346-save-the-endangered-african-elephant
https://studentshare.org/biology/1479346-save-the-endangered-african-elephant.
Those harming the elephants seem to intensify their activities each day despite the moves to oppose the activities leading to reduction in numbers of the number of elephants in African nations (Hertzler 8). The areas of our lives affected by this problem include: 1. The more the dwelling places for people continue decreasing as the population of the people increase, individuals and elephants remain constantly conflicting with each other in several occasions and at various places. 2. Where the farms are just next to the elephant dwelling places or cross elephant relocation paths, destruction to crops and societies become popular, causing the origin of fight, which the elephants at the end lose. 3. Worse of all, death on some occasions happens on both sides, as individuals remain tramped while attempting to cover their livelihood, and “challenge” range” elephants remain killed by game protectors. 4. Apart from these social effects of the elephants to human beings, politically, the extinction of elephants, which are a source of revenue to our nation, causes a drawback in the growth of the economy.
The deterioration of the economy leads to poor living standards of the citizens of the affected nation. Step 2 Since 1981 to 1989, the elephant numbers in Africa decreased from 1.3 million to 650 thousand elephants. Eastern and central African nations permitted poachers to kill elephants for ivory. Southern African nations managed illegal hunting and controlled the numbers of elephants. Despite preservationists asking about the numbers projections, several individuals panicked that, African elephants could shortly distinguish from the earth.
The poachers killed the elephants in large numbers even without caring the importance of them to African nations. The number of the elephants decreased at an alarming rate and the Africans had to respond quickly to save the situation (Hertzler 10). This situation led to: 1. Decreased number of tourists touring African nations to visit the game parks and reserves to admire the elephants hence reduced revenue. 2. The reduced revenue led to slow rate of economic growth and thus affecting the living standards of the Africans: deteriorated. 3. Reduced number of tourists led to some individuals employed in the tourism sector losing their jobs and thus affecting their lives. 4. The loss of jobs may even lead to rise of crimes like theft in order for one to sustain his life and those of the dependants.
Two sensitization programs remained started to save the elephants from the poachers who had intensified in their activities. One was political poaching to do away with global ivory business completely. The other program was a technique to form popular assets rights and offer local societies an incentive to preserve elephants. The program to prohibit trade remained started with the “Urgent Memorandum” through the African Wildlife Foundation (AWF). After the process of initializing, it remained forwarded to AWF team, giving caution on quick reduction in elephant preservation rule.
Scholars inside WWF offered no support for the ban on ivory business (Chaytor 5). Scientists did not exist. The first group to suggest a prohibition remained the Human Society of the United States. They desired to improve African elephants from Appendix II to Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of Flora and Fauna, spelling out
...Download file to see next pages Read More