This essay encompasses the question of the diversity of people’s culture in terms of different research conduction. The author suggests that all rules, laws, policies and guidelines governing research should be harmonized to provide a framework for easier referencing…
Download file to see previous pages...
In America, the Institutional Review Boards is a body charged with responsibilities of ensuring that the aforementioned concerns are addressed amicably so that research can be conducted appropriately hence providing reliable findings that will change the complexity of human life. in this particular case, a conclusion will be drawn based five studies case that has indicated how unethically conducted research can affect the normal life of individuals.
Considering the first case, the researchers carried out the study on the effectiveness of penicillin in curing syphilis. It is paramount to state that they acted unethically by overstretching the freedom bestowed on them. as such, they acted with least responsibility and disrespect to humanity. In the second case, the researchers disregarded the cultural practices of particular people through excavating of their keens’ remains. Similarly, with the third case, the procedures that involve getting approval by the IRB is quite restricted. As such, it is hard to get approval making some researchers disregard the regulatory body. In the fourth case, the IRB is accused of unethically derailing some mega projects on grounds that they are unethical. Finally, the fifth case concerns researchers who dishonestly obtains human specimen such as blood without properly informed consent.
All researchers should seek guidance and authorization before carrying its preliminaries. In addition, they should present the research proposal beforehand to allow experts to give their opinion for or against the procedure.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Ethics Boards. Should IRB set common rules for researchers Case Study”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/anthropology/1687313-ethics-boards-should-irb-set-common-rules-for-researchers
(Ethics Boards. Should IRB Set Common Rules for Researchers Case Study)
“Ethics Boards. Should IRB Set Common Rules for Researchers Case Study”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/anthropology/1687313-ethics-boards-should-irb-set-common-rules-for-researchers.
This is a typical summary of what ethics in all its considerations entails. It is through ethics that formidable relationships based on mutual respect are formed. It is however disheartening to see people associate ethics with formal situations such as work places.
Virtuous agents do not follow any defined rules in making decisions; instead, they take decisions that are consistent in achieving a certain excellence that involves the use of sound moral decision making guided by virtues such as honesty, fairness, temperance and integrity.
This problem does not only cause certain areas of the community not to have adequate security, but also results in police officers engaging in corrupt practices. Police accountability has always been an issue that brings considerable challenges to police leaders.
It provided the researcher with enough evidence on ethical lapses present within an organization particularly in the pharmaceutical sector. The report has been divided into two tasks. Task 1 is based on the case study, “GlaxoSmithKline experiences high cost of product quality issues” which identifies the ethical lapses that may have affected the product quality at GSK.
Equity is uniquely conscience based and is a discretionary regime which has its own set of principles .Sometimes it can be more powerful than common law rights, because when common law fails to provide adequate remedy, equity may come into force to provide remedy.
People will work harder for appreciation than they will for money.
Recognition and communication are key elements in a successful company. Richard Ellsworth (2002) explores the corporate mentality and challenges the conventional wisdom that corporations should be dedicated to the creation of shareholder wealth.
The situations in which a contract will be avoided on the ground that one or both parties have made a mistake will be somewhat limited.
However, cases have shown that in certain circumstances a contract may be void in common law on the ground that there was a mistake.
A common diagnosis is acute cystitis, a low urinary tract infection that is uncomplicated in most cases.
Complications as urosepsis do occur, and are more common in males, the elderly, and infants. The etiology of GU tract infections depends on patient's age, underlying medical conditions, type of infection, and history of antibiotic use or hospitalization, among others (Abrahamian, 2008).
Organizations have a duty to ensure that their operations, rules and regulations, and organizations policies do not adversely affect its stakeholders. In the case, the stakeholders that affected are the managers, customers and sales personnel, and
Civil law is open to flexibility. This is because changing scenarios necessitate the dynamism in laws to address contemporary issues. This is unlike common law whose facts do not change as decisions are made from a distinct basis. Besides, in a common law proceeding, a trial is usually a unique hearing lasting for a comparatively short period.
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Case Study on topic Ethics Boards. Should IRB set common rules for researchers for FREE!