Nature vs. Nurture [Name of Student] [Name of Instructor] [Name of Course] [Date] Nature vs. Nurture Over the years, the debated contest of viewpoints regarding nature vs. nurture has been addressed by academics and research. The fact remains that the debate is still ongoing with increasing claims being made about it almost every day…
Download file to see previous pages...
This paper aims to critically assess different schools of thought regarding the issue of nature vs. nurture. Famous anthropologists of all time including Edward Wilson, Sherry Ortner etc. have provided their in-depth addresses regarding nature vs. nurture debate. These anthropologists have greatly provided three distinctive grounds of understanding the issue of nature vs. nurture. Before understanding the addresses of differing schools of thought, it is imperative to note that the analogy of any individual cannot be solely dependent upon one factor (Gass, 2007). Looking at the issue of nature vs. nurture, it can well state that the socio-biological school of thought claims that it is the nature which is more likely to dominate nurture. It is said because the genetic patterns of human beings are able to work favorably than with un-relative selection of genes. In other words, it can be said that association between the genetic relatives is more likely to be effective rather than being connected to strangers. This may come under the standing of nepotism. This concludes that a person may be angry because the family that he belongs have higher rate of anger-showing behavior. This may genetically get forwarded to kin selected in relative genetic structure. In many settings of human interaction, it has been noted that individuals may be able to undertake a strong decision because they believe that the family genes will allow transmission of same flexible behavior to upcoming generations. Similar patterns of needs and desire among human beings are noted when the genetic mapping of their cells is relative to each other. This has also been proven by science that cell generation may have equal characterization. However, this can also lead to another argument stating the weaknesses of a human to be transferred to upcoming generations (Fotaki, 2011). Secondly, a most powerful yet a very logical school of thought are considered to be feminist. It is because the nature and nurture of babies would always be associated with women one way or the other. This is because they are the ones who will share the experiences forward by educating and training kin (Shankman, 2011). It will not be incorrect to state that the feminist school of thought has basically rejected old school of thought that have not considered the feminist view or cultural representation of women. Herein, it should be marked that the feminist view is based upon gender and not sex. It is because the phenomenon of gender is basically a statement role given to an individual as perceived in the culture. On the other hand, sex is a universal depicter. By understanding this, it rather becomes clear that nature and nurture is greatly affected by the way they are living as a gender in any society (LeVine, 2010). Women raise children under different settings having experiences of their representation. This is the major reason behind different behavior among people. The gender difference has made it quite evident that nurture of individuals may be affected y large depending upon the environment. In this way, the feminist view rejects the concept of genetic linking of cells that makes upon behavior pattern theory. The anthropologists who look at the issue of nature vs. nurture in a more appropriate manner may categorize human experiences into two categories. Firstly, it is the mental domain of people where individuals are more likely to have an opinion about them. The
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Nature vs. Nurture Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/anthropology/1494026-nature-vs-nurture
(Nature Vs. Nurture Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Nature Vs. Nurture Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/anthropology/1494026-nature-vs-nurture.
Nature and nurture can influence the physical, mental, emotional and social development of a child in different ways. Even if a child’s nature or heredity is sound, it doesn’t mean that the child may develop properly if brought up in a poor environment.
The main focus of these researches is to know if human beings are ‘born’ with certain personality traits or do they ‘learn’ it from their environment. Knowing the cause of behavior doesn’t seem that important when one thinks of people who are ‘normal’ and have healthy personalities.
Most experts agree that both the impact of nature and nurture contribute to a child’s cognitive, social and physical development but to what degree and precisely how each contributes remains undetermined. The case for each side of the nature vs. nurture argument presents persuasive evidence regarding how both factors influence child development.
Sleeper and Chudler (2007, p.14) assert that “nature refers to skills humans are born with, and nurture refers to skills humans learn.” Every human being has some inborn or hereditary qualities that are passed over to him through genes; but, there are a lot of other qualities that he learns over time through knowledge and experience.
There is a lot of literature that talks about the homosexuality in the Greeks and the Romans. For example, the Emperor Nero in ancient Rome twice got married to men (Kulkarni, 2011). The Holy Books also discuss some nations that were punished for being homosexual. In the contemporary age, homosexuals are spread all over the world. Several countries have legalized homosexuality.
Lifespan development is an intra individual changes corresponding to age (Cherry, 2012). The development occurs in a manner showing the level of functioning. Researchers have contended that, life cycle consists of 25 years of era. The developmental periods encompass childhood, adolescence, early adulthood and late adult hood where each distinct stage comprises of changes that are evident in one’s life, and it takes six years for a complete change.
The growing literature on the understanding of human development has made it clear that both sides of the debate are partly right. Nature endows individuals with inborn traits and capabilities while nurture molds the genetic tendencies as people mature and learn.
of our nature, and awaking thrilling horror - one to make the reader dread to look round, to curdle the blood, and quicken the beating of the heart” (p 10). The intent was to make the reader examine the nature of being human, the controlling power of a parent to a child by
According to the paper, nature is an aspect, which is inherited or genetic while nurture means all environmental influences after conception including experience. Philosophers such as Descartes and Plato posited that certain things are inborn or traits that occur naturally regardless of influence from the environment.
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Nature vs. Nurture for FREE!