For instance, there is a section that talks about the place inside the storm, which is a relatively calm place within a storm while another dwells on the exact genesis of the Yomeshta cult. According to (Bernardo & Murphy 2006, pp 12-76). Gethen inhabitants are characteristically hermaphroditic humans because for a period of twenty-four days of the lunar cycle that consist of twenty-six days, they are biologically sexually latent androgynies while for the rest of the two days they are either male or female depending on the pheromonal negotiation that aspires with a sexual partner that has developed interest.
It is in this aspect that each of the inhabitants of the planet Winter can both with a lot of success sire and bear off-springs. In terms of physical composition, the Gethenians are brown-skinned and as demonstrated from the film have wide variations, thus do not have beards and most interestingly their breasts are just slightly bigger than normal human males. The spokesperson from the planet Earth is in contrast darker-skinned and relatively taller compared with many of the Gethenians. However, he can be mistaken to be a native if he wears indigenous clothing, which has been the case with earlier observers who were able to hide their real identity.
The doubled standards is also brought about by the fact that Gethenians could have been genetically modified for hermaphroditism by the Hainish civilization, which is believed to have been planted colonies on quite a number of worlds such as the Earth. It is believed that the Gethenians might have undergone modification so as to maximise on the rate of production on the harsh cold climate of Gethen, which is thought to have taken place as a general attempt to get rid of the war and as a social experiment (Brosnan 1978, pp 8-35).
The author therefore developed the concept of a desire to find out what has been considered basic to the nature of humans when biological gender was overtaken by events. The movie, The Left Hand of Darkness is an important leap as far as sophistication in the treatment of the theme of sex in science fiction is concerned. Embracing the aspects of society, psychology, and emotions of human beings in a foreign land, the film is a significant achievement in the history of intellectual science fiction (Bernardo & Murphy 2006, pp 12-76).
Body Snatchers Body Snatchers is generally set in Santa Mira, a tiny California town that has been invaded by pods from outer space that surprisingly replicate and miraculously take the position of humans. The main character in the movie is Miles Bennell, a local physician who utterly resists the invaders as well as their attempts to eliminate the existence of human beings from the earth. The film, Body Snatchers invokes quest for more knowledge and understanding about the nature of man. It both reflected a particular period in history and a clear indication of escalation of social injustices in the society.
The movie attempted to address the dehumanization of persons, a very sensitive topic in the contemporary times that is characterized by a lot of wild happenings (Brosnan 1978, pp 8-35).The only resistance presented in the movie is the repression of individualism, which the film maker, Siegel has identified with. The conflict between the individual and society is seen as a more metaphysical duel as opposed to the political one. The villains are not found on the other side of the planet, but basically amidst us.
T is therefore in order to say that the real enemy is basically the totalitarian conformity. It also comes out very clearly that act of resistance should be against all manners of conformity, and if not the case then the enemy may dupe one to giving up the aspect of individuality by assuming an alien cause. Body Snatchers as brought out in the movie may as well be interpreted as anti-scientific, thus reflecting the kind of fears that pervaded a particular period in time. For example, during the earlier years of America’s exploration of the space, many people feared that space would in a way invade the planet earth thus viewed the movie as a potential warning in relation to the looming dangers of inventions and science (Androvich 2000, pp 45-60).
Read More