The Nature of Self-justification of the Authoritarian Personality - Assignment Example

The Scapegoat Introduction Scapegoat is the tendency of individual persons to show aggression to groups that are disliked, powerless or even invisible when they are frustrated or unhappy about something. The vice may occur when people are in one way or the other frustrated, for example, in the line of the financial resources, but there is no clear target to blame for the frustration. This may occur even without direct competitions, for example, there was a young man called Hamlet who was one of the greatest dramatic characters that were ever created on the whole world. From the period that we meet the crestfallen Prince, we were always enraptured by his elegant intensity. He was a man of great radical contradictions who was very reckless yet cautious, cautious but was very uncivil, tender though was very ferocious. He encounters the death of his father with consuming outrage and righteous indignation but does not even show compunction yet he is fully responsible for the meddling death of his father. The authoritarian personality of the Hamlet did not give him an opportunity to have an insight of his shortcomings and even the projection of his weaknesses and faults which most likely represents very important aspects of scapegoating. "We must undertake a life-changing steps, eye opening and spirit-raising odyssey against any kind of intolerance and misunderstanding making us to see and understand these characters in our lives as people learn to record their thoughts and even the feelings in the diaries and eventually to dub themselves the freedom world in homage to the civil rights activists", said Hamlet. Grit is the best indicator or predictor of any success in the life of any person especially when it comes to goals that are set to achieve out of conscious deeds of a person. In some cases, grit proves to be a better indicator of personal success than the IQ. The best idea that one can learn from the building grits in the children is growth mindset that comes with a belief that ability of someone to learn is not fixed and that it can change with the amount of effort that is put. When children read and learn about the brain and how it changes and even grow in response to any challenge then they are most likely to persevere when they encounter failure because they will live to believe that failure is not a permanent condition. The story goes on with a discussion of some common cinematic concept of scapegoats where Hamlet demonstrates a lot of many rebellious characters that were allocated to the victim process in the days of the Hollywood production. His position was ambiguous and dredged both the society and audience their favorites and accorded them a lot of compliances with his model of violence. Hamlet always stipulates that the surrogated victims must always come from the margins of the communities that have either guilt or innocence in the trouble of their people. Having a lot of hate to these modern scapegoats gave the viewers the catharsis whereby they put a lot of the blames on the wrong doings of the society and felt a sense of closure that resulted in the punishment of the villain. The issue was that this brand of the surrogated victim gave rise to some cheap understanding of contemporary issues as the Hamlet may put it giving for example that good will hunting that lacks the character of the scapegoat to cure the young man from a lot of mimetic rivalries that has infected him. Considering perpetrators of violence as groups of populations that have the predisposed potentiality for the behaviors that are anti-social and that have less self-awareness and empathy to other members of society who are affected by the vice. In a culture that is commonly predisposed to violence, Hamlet believed that such personality types become perpetrators either through self-selection or selection by authorities. He was a man of great radical contradictions who was very reckless yet cautious, cautious but was very uncivil, tender though was very ferocious. He encounters the death of his father with consuming outrage and righteous indignation but does not even show compunction yet he is fully responsible for the meddling death of his father. He decides to use fragile and even a very innocent Ophelia as an outlet for his disgust towards his queen and cannot even make a comprehension that his characters and vicious wording has caused has made her insane. He is full of fault, but it is surprising that his negative qualities like indecisiveness, hastiness brutality can enhance his position as a very tragic hero. From his characters, we can envision his pale face and broody eyes that totally display a black character that indicates all forms of moods and shapes of grief. His wife cannot help but has noticed his outward appearance of great sorrow and mourning, but decides to make it clear that the overt signs of the grief does not indicate the how sad he is from inside. As is often the case, an otherwise good character may offer the subjects a facile ending that gives a lot of relief and satisfaction but at the cost of what could have been considered from the perspective of challenging characterization. For the case of violent situations, for example, the villains immolation in most cases lead to easy satisfaction and even fascination with a lot of spectacularly violent deaths. From the time of the cynicism spawned by the breakdown that was done by the America itself during the Vietnam War, violence of this type has gained very little recognition in terms of the sacral quality and has increasingly been seen to appease communal need to see it. Individuals with such marked characteristics are more vulnerable to frustrations to follows a great extent and cannot even manage to tolerate it or manage the idea of carrying the responsibilities that is brought about by the frustrations and are most likely to put the blame on the misfortune and the impediment on the shoulder of other people. It must therefore be accepted that a specific form of human personality can be used to justify some of the procedure that is followed to initiate the scapegoating process that will always seem without the need of the situational trigger. The self-righteous and the nature of self-justification of the authoritarian personality would most likely lead to a lot of tolerance blames that is highly unlikely. It would therefore hardly be regarded as the as any possibility to be considered making the source of frustration be put elsewhere. General hostility and suspicion can be a motivating factor that can produce the scapegoating procedure for example there are individuals that are predisposed to elements of prejudice not mainly because of the influence of the external surrounding in which they stay but because of the people they are. This young man called Hamlet who is one of the greatest dramatic characters that was ever created in the whole world. From the period that we meet the crestfallen Prince, we were always enraptured by his elegant intensity. Hamlet cannot lose the memories of his father even if all those that surround him have resumed their merry lives and even provided the content to offer the occasional conciliatory words that could be considered words of wisdom. The truth that is now facing Hamlet can make him face the paradoxical truth that to avenge the death of his father he must be prepared to commit the very act for which he seeks revenge. For fate to be used as the scapegoat, Hamlet can try to distance himself from that act of killing his father he can now accept the he has very little knowledge of the world as it is true that no man know aught of what he may seek leave and even what is not what to leave betimes. He has reached the climax of his philosophizing and is preparing himself for his death. When Hamlet finally meets his death, it is his princely qualities that make the lasting imprint in our minds. Hamlet became in some ways indicated the signs of commitment to his course of action that appeared to the Faust signing his pact with the devil and for some good period things went almost improbably well for this young hero. He is winning the gratification that he had dreamed of and seems to be getting away with it. His tremendous grief was mainly intensified by the inability of those people to him to have a feeling, and more importantly, by the cold-hearted actions of his mother, who decided to marry her brother-in-law within the same month that her husband died (Calum 25). This act of treachery by Gertrude to whom he had great love at one time, rips the very fabric of being in Hamlet, and he continued to torture himself with a lot of memories of his late fathers tenderness. His beliefs were greatly held with a lot of rigidity and inflexibility with a lot of their values pegged in the ordinary and conventional way of doing things. He could not tolerate weaknesses either in themselves or even in others. For them, people should be punished for any transgression of any of the conventional social code of conduct and that those defy this code should not be understood whatsoever. Until recently, a lot of people could not believe that there was a correlation between what a man could be as a person and what he may be forced to do in his work. It is true that one can decide to be a good family man and also a ruthless businessman. This is an acceptable modern life. These kinds of remarks prefigured many years of commentary on the subject matter as critics struggle to evaluate aspects of coexistence and the business. From that time, critics have tried to deal with the perceived moral relativity engendered by the people. Some critiques give a sympathetic view of the situation as far as real people regard the role of the family in the film to be a highly symbolic depiction of the faceless political and corporate greed. The real victim is not is a film of the plot, but it majorly dwells in the Hamlet camerawork. The primary viewpoint implied is for harsh judgment stripping a lot of viewers of their ambivalent or sympathetic outlook for the fixation of the consolidation of the power and revenge yields for the bloodiest of the sacrificial crises. The purpose of this chapter is to affirm the scapegoating mechanisms of Hamlet through showing the godfathers violence that imparts a moral viewpoint and enacts compassion is shading of the blood and concentrating on the both the physical and mental anguish and even the spiritual collapse. The godfather, in essence, does not delight in violent scenes, but it does prod its subjects forcefully inciting a lot of people think about the consequences (Robert 192). However, his tremendous grief was mainly intensified by the inability of those people to him to have a feeling, and more importantly, by the cold-hearted actions of his mother, who decided to marry her brother-in-law within the same month that her husband died. Hamlets ultra-violence nature repulses a lot of people several times with very many scenes of incredible and artificially made ways of rendering blood lettings so that his subjects could condemn him once and for all. Irrespective of the far into the warmth of the family matters, Hamlets subjective view, could pull his subjects, he is still seen as isolated bastardized scapegoat as he slips on his selfish contemplations. Conclusion It must therefore be accepted that a specific form of human personality can be used to justify some of the procedure that is followed to initiate the scapegoating process that will always seem without the need of the situational trigger. The self-righteous and the nature of self-justification of the authoritarian personality would most likely lead to a lot of tolerance blames that is highly unlikely. It would therefore hardly be regarded as any possibility to be considered making the source of frustration be put elsewhere. As is often the case, an otherwise good character may offer the subjects a facile ending that gives a lot of relief and satisfaction but at the cost of what could have been considered from the perspective of challenging characterization. For the case of violent situations, for example, the villain’s immolation in most cases lead to easy satisfaction and even fascination with a lot of spectacularly violent deaths. As it can be seen clearly that the authoritarian personality of the Hamlet denies him an opportunity to have insight of his shortcomings and even the projection of his weaknesses and faults which most likely represents very important aspects of scapegoating. For a person to be considered a hero the in some way, he must be incomplete or unfulfilled and is made up of thoughts that can be turned towards the future as we hope for some unusual gratification. Some elements of desire or even course of action must present itself and a lot of his energy must get focus. . Considering perpetrators of violence as groups of populations that have the predisposed potentiality for the behaviors that are anti-social and that have less self-awareness and empathy to other members of society who are affected by the vice. Works Cited Kerr, Robert L. "Burying Don Imus: Anatomy of a Scapegoat." Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 87.1 (2010): 192-4 Macleod, Calum. "Scapegoat or Superstar - Escaping the Managerial Blame Game." The British Journal of Administrative Management (2006): 24-5 Read More