Nobody downloaded yet

Reflection on the film 12 Angry Men - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The film 12 Angry Men, by Sidney Lumet unveils the curtain of prejudice in the mainstream society. This film, which was released in the year 1957, helps one to know how personal opinion/ prejudice lead the elite class to take decisions on the fate of the underdogs in the society…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.9% of users find it useful
Reflection on the film 12 Angry Men
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Reflection on the film 12 Angry Men"

Download file to see previous pages Reflection on the film 12 Angry Men

The problem of prejudice and the difficulty faced by the jurors in decision making process is still an unresolved problem in the global context. In the beginning, most of the jurors were against the culprit. In the end, all the jurors came to know that their decision is based upon their personal opinions on the immigrant population. My personal opinion/reflection on the film 12 Angry Men is divided into three sections: prejudice, racial supremacy, and misuse of law. Prejudice I am of the opinion that the director made use of the protagonist (the immigrant boy, probably from Puerto Rican Island) to unmask the depth of prejudice against immigrants in America. I believe that prejudice based upon racial and cultural identity is an important problem faced by a member who belongs to an immigrant community. If we are not from an immigrant community, there exists less possibility to have deeper understanding on this problem. Within this context, the director makes use of the protagonist as a medium to express his opinion on the problem faced by immigrants. In the beginning of the film, the jury, which consists of 12 members, does not show any particular interest in the emotional trauma faced by the boy. Biskind (2001) made clear that, “In the view of the strong case against the defendant, it is not too surprising that the jury’s first straw vote comes out 11 to 1 for conviction” (p.11). ...
So, in my opinion, the film portrays how prejudice affects the smooth functioning of law and order in a modern society. Racial superiority I think racial superiority is a myth based upon false opinion, not upon fact. The elite class in the society considers that their status in the society is indebted to their racial identity. But one cannot prove that racial identity determines one’s superiority over others. So, I am totally against racial superiority. One of the factors which attracted me towards this film is the director’s attempt to expose that racial superiority is a myth. In the film, the boy is the victim of racial superiority/racial supremacy. For instance, most of the members of the jury are white middle class men. Still, all the members are from different layers of the society. Most of them do not try to allow the boy to prove his innocence. On the other side, juror 8, an architect by profession, is not ready to act against the boy. Later, some of the jurors like Juror 5 and Juror 11 decide to change their opinion. Still, Juror 3’s wavering nature hinders the jury members to have a unanimous decision. In the film, most of the jury members are not aware of their role in decision making process because they act according to the false beliefs in the society. One can see that most of the jury members are middle aged and their personal opinions on the immigrants deeply influence their decisions. So, the film helped me to know more about the problem of prejudice based upon racial superiority. Misuse of law I consider this film as an eye-opener to those who believe that death penalty can reduce crime in the society. On the other side, law is misused to victimize innocent individuals who are not ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Reflection on the film 12 Angry Men Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Reflection on the Film 12 Angry Men Research Paper)
“Reflection on the Film 12 Angry Men Research Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Reflection on the film 12 Angry Men

12 angry men film analysis

...12 Angry Men Order ID – 853036 Introduction The movie “12 Angry Men” (1957) by Brian Rathjen, deals with a case of capital murder involving a youth of Spanish- American dissent. The chief premise of this movie is to prove his guilt or innocence in front of a deliberating jury. This mini drama comprises of the prejudices and misconceptions of the jury in trying to arrive at the proper solution in the trial of first degree murder. The accused is a Hispanic - Latino, 18 years of age and the crime is the killing of his father by stabbing. 1. Leadership: Describe the different approaches to leadership represented on the jury. What theory or...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

12 Angry Men

... 12 Angry Men Director Sidney Lumet’s 1957 film12 Angry Men” did not do well at the box-office thanks to the full-color motion pictures that continued to draw many away, nor did it receive widespread awards and accolades within the film industry, although it did receive several nominations for Academy Awards including Best Picture, Best Director and Best Adapted Screenplay.1 In the years following, the film has not seen much additional success, but has maintained a firm grip on its position as social commentary and innovative production techniques as it did provide an intimate look into the American justice system, complete with its breakdowns, weaknesses and strengths, that has withstood the test of time, holding its own among... the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

12 angry men movie

... 16 Feb. 2008 12 Angry Men The film12 Angry Men” is a critically acclaimed film directed by first time director Sidney Lumet and released in the year 1957. The film is about the court trial of an 18 year old Spanish-American boy who is accused of murdering his father. A jury consisting of 12 men is assigned the job of looking into the case. It is the duty of the jury to come up with a unanimous decision whether to acquit or convict the Hispanic. The movie is famous for the use of a single set. The entire movie was filmed in a single jury room with the exception of three minutes in the washroom. The movie for nominated for three Oscars(Best Director, Best Picture and Best Writing, screenplay based on material from another medium... ) and...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

12 Angry Men - Movie Review

...12 Angry Men- Movie Review The Story-Background: 12 Angry men is a movie based on the trial of a teenaged South American boy accused of his father’s murder. The movie is set in the jury room where 12 men are to decide the fate of the boy based on the facts as provided before and their own deliberations. But there can be only two verdicts, and if they choose “guilty” the boy will go the electric chair for his death sentence. There is no choice of appeal. However, if they have reasonable doubt about the case they must acquit the boy of the murder charge. His life now lies in the hands of the 12 men who begin the deliberations almost convinced of his guilt but as it is later revealed their judgments are clouded by personal biases... Angry Men-...
6 Pages(1500 words)Assignment

12 Angry Men (1957) -

...Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx 4 November 12 Angry Men The movie ‘12 Angry Men’ is a ic example of how a person’s strong conviction can enter hearts of others and make them think with a different outlook. The movie begins with the judge asking the jury to retire in the other room and come up with a decision. Eleven out of twelve jury members are in staunch support of the accused being given capital punishment. But there is one person who has ‘reasonable doubts’ in his mind about the evidences and the witnesses. He decides to vote not guilty for the accused and starts to give the logic behind his thinking. What happens after that is...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

12 angry men

...12 Angry Men The movie “12 Angry Men” is an archetypal courtroom movie featuring twelve jurors and a defendant, accused of murder. The movie depicts the jury as the core and integral part of the criminal justice system. In the movie, one of the jurors is of a dissenting opinion and passionately attempt to free the accused. He does this by successfully convincing the other 11 members of the jury to buy his idea of “burden of proof” concerning the evidence presented against the accused. The defendant is accused of having murdered his vicious father. When the case reaches the jury, the majority of the 12-member jury has no...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

12 Angry Men

...Group process in the film12 angry men” The jury deliberation in the film, “12 angry men” is a portrayal of group dynamics. Group dynamics relates to the functioning, structure and the roles individuals play in a group. The jury in the film, consisting of twelve men, was drawn together to determine whether the boy was culpable of killing his father. The characteristics of group dynamics applicable to this case include personality conflicts, the operation of the jurors’ minds and their joint effort in determining the truth. The movie represents an entire spectrum of...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

12 Angry men

...from it. The courthouse of which the movie was filmed was filled with 12 men all who seem to be of the same race and of the same general age. It seems that the only difference between the jurors are their social and economic backgrounds which the movie had illustrated on it could influence a person’s mindset and judgment. For example, Juror 5 shared the “slum upbringing “ as the young boy being charged, that allowed him to relate to his living conditions but other juror like Juror 4 seemed to judge the boy harshly based on where he was raised. Juror 4 even as far to say… “ If you live in slum you become slum”. These statements indicates the biases of the jurors due to their...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

12 Angry Men (Movie)

...12 Angry Men (Film) Question Symbolic convergence theory Symbolic convergence theory explains the cohesive nature of social groups by sharing emotions, meanings and motives. The theory postulates that humans always want to understand an occurrence depending on the people involved their motivations, personality traits and agency of the occurrence. The same is the case in the film as the twelve jurors make their decision by systematically changing their belief on the guilt of the defender. Eleven of them decide that the boy is guilty without considering any of the evident effectively. They do so owing to the effects of discussion in the courtroom coupled...
5 Pages(1250 words)Movie Review

Movie Analysis: 12 Angry Men

...Movie Analysis: 12 Angry Men Affiliation: Introduction Evidence decision-making processes and organizational behavior is observed in the movie 12 Angry Men (1957). A recap on the film shows 12 men deciding the fate of an 18-year-old man accused of killing his father. These men, jurors, give their opinions and vote (guilty or not guilty) based on rational and irrational reasons. As observed within the movie, a variety of evidence-based analysis of the case lead to their decision as observed through the use of verbal and non-verbal communication cues. Movie Analysis Conflicts According to the movie, Juror # 10 is convinced that people from slum backgrounds "are liars and are wild and dangerous" (Lumet,1957). This portrays... the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Reflection on the film 12 Angry Men for FREE!

Contact Us