Accumulative Ratios Analysis Figure ii Buses lateness (January 2012) Station Number of lateness Percent of lateness distribution Accumulative Percent Northern 4 10% 10% Southern 8 20% 30% Western 6 15% 45% Eastern 10 25% 70% Dubai 4 10% 80% Section 13 3 7% 87% Section 44 2 5% 93% Section 46 3 7% 100% Total 40 100% 100% In the figure ii illustrate a table of data that were collected as per the bus distribution to the eight stations. It also gives cumulative percentages. Pareto Chart Figure iii Pareto Chart for cars that delay in their services and that complaint were launched by parents and teachers.
As per the chart above, Eastern station has appears to be a good study media, in determining the causes that made all the buses that were reported to be late seemed to have increased to 40 thus making the clients to be dissatisfied as quality was deteriorating. In order to come up with impressive results through daily practical work with the customers, the duration that is taken on the road should be reduced so that the time which will spent in general will be shorter. This concept is attached to arrival time.
For bus drivers, arrival time is the time that the time picks a child at home to the time that it offers the child to the authorities by all the eight stations (Plunkett, 2006). In addition, it is the time that the same buses go to the respective schools, pick up the children and deliver them home in the evening. The arrival time is measured by the number of minutes that each bus takes right after picking children to the time they alight at the school compound. On the first the buses should start early at their various stations in order to avoid the jam which may be the main causer of lateness of buses.
Data Collection The service managers who are in charge of quality at City Hopper Company conducted a thorough survey at Eastern station so as to come up with proper reasons that made such huge lateness of pupils both to school and to their homes from schools. The reasons that will be collected will assist formulating long lasting solutions to the lateness. The first move was data collection of Eastern station, they were then divided into two sections and named X and Y. group A represented lateness of buses of the stations when taking the children to school and section B represents lateness recorded when returning children to their parents.
According to the data that was earlier presented, Eastern station contributes 25% of the total lateness recorded by City Hoppers of the eight stations which was done in January 2012. The represents 10 trips that were made were late for the groups X and Y. Percentage of late trips that were made for the two regions The figure above gives an illustration on the percentage lateness for the two identified regions X and Y. As illustrated in the pie chart, above, region X had the most trips that were late with a percentage of 70% unlike region Y which had 30% of the total trips that were recorded to have been late during that period of time.
In the actual sense, region X had made 7 late trips while Y had made 3 late trips. The data of the two regions will be discussed in detail with the aid of tables as illustrated below. A sample of 16 buses will be focused and the time that will be required of them in order to reach at their destination without being late. These tables are the core data that will lead to further diagrams in order to help assess the performance and to determine key processes that require some attention (Klugh, 2007).
Region X Buses number and the time expected of them January 2012 Bus No. Time needed(Min.) Bus No. Time needed(Min.) 1 47 9 43 2 51 10 42 3 54 11 50 4 47 12 45 5 53 13 39 6 53 14 48 7 51 15 54 8 42 16 46 The data above is a summary of number of buses that has been allocated to region X and the time needed of them to reach their destinations without being late. Region Y Buses number and the time expected of them January 2012 Bus No. Time needed (Min.) Bus No.
Read More