The report indicates that there was a lot existed within the confusions story of adoption and retention of these children from their rightful societies. The common term used is the ‘stolen generations’. Ideologies (scientific racism) There is a detailed analysis of the sources and origins of the Australian people. Accordingly, the ideologies that try to segregate the community in the Australian society commences with the worldviews accorded to the Aboriginal relatedness. These ideologies demand a process of analysing them before substantial inference gets constructed with respect to what the ideas were.
However, ancestral lineages were attributed to bloodlines and the physical differences between the societies in Australia (Home, 1997). Possibly, this could have evolved from some of the society’s adoption of superior nuisance with respect to the entire society. Therefore, the first idea that creates relatedness and segregation are the difference in ancestral backgrounds. Core assumptions and conclusions get made with respect to the origin and identity which is scientifically profound within every individual.
This may happen knowingly or unknowingly. Accordingly, the life stages of persons acted as a guide to what a difference one had from the other person. According to the report, a livelihood or identity is configured by the various life stages that one undergoes before becoming extinct. That is; the stages commence from conception, and then moves towards birth, childhood, young-adulthood, adulthood and the elder hood which precedes death (McConnochie, 2011). Hence, the entire life creates a point of reference of whether there is any commonality between oneself and another individual.
This was one of the contextualized ideologies that were used by the Aboriginals in Australia. It is wrong to judge a child’s social basis, especially in he or she is very young. For instance, the report concludes that the reality of difference ought not to be in case the child gets conceived. However, difference in race manifests itself when the child acquires forms of physical maturation. That is; the reality in expansion of the level of relatedness can get counted on, at a progressive rate.
The expansion in racism could be the feasible reason different forms of reasoning emerge. In fact, the art of language and communication between the members of the same race manage to distinguish them from the rest unreasonably. Accordingly, the idea of conception and birth are virtually common from any society that we deem to understand. The circle of livelihood becomes a platform for everyone to identify. The concept could be reasonably related to the racial ideology where one identifies himself from that perspective.
According to scientific inference and reliable scholarly reflections, the science of circles creates a no starting or ending point (Behrendt, 2002). Therefore, one is considered as any other but remains within the same circle. The circle generates a sense of engagement, as well as, extension within oneself. However, it also creates a feasible condition where isolation and exclusion emerges with respect to where one originates. Therefore, the concept of relatedness crops up once more. Total control Other aspects of control do not indicate any sense of invariability until the consequences felt at the helm of instances.
A lot of injustices remain created whenever a society offers provisions for deeper disintegration amongst variant members of the society. In this case, the Australian case is quite complex. It is all about controlling parenthood and property. Previously discussed insolence for specific races led to permanent displacement of children from their societies through prejudiced channels. However, this case now depicts how much the society could facilitate segregation and disrespect for the rights of some of the personalities with respect to what they call life.
The parenting roles get depicted as subject to the provision by the territory government and religious-enabled control (Behrendt, 2002).
Read More