Judging the Three Judgments - Assignment Example

Judging the Three Judgments on three Articles The purpose of this paper is basically to be critical about the three different papers I have created in the past. The process of critical thinking applied on each paper grows deep with understanding as the topic moves with explanations and personal ideas that thrive within the text. The longing is not mainly to have a uniform idea to rule over the different subjects stated on the three papers, instead create a unifying process that will bring about proper understanding of the subjects being presented. Perhaps it will not be proper to repeat the topic of each of my papers. What can be useful at present is to just have a glimpse of what were mentioned and tackled because in the first place, briefing and showing the surface through a story is the first art of most well-understood point. To start with, the article I wrote about the painting of Van Gogh entitled La Berceuse. I had a minimal critic of the colors and the surrounding as well as the emotions present in the painting. Like anybody else amused with some fascinating color and presentation, my amusement led me to thinking how the artist could have arrived with the process of creating the masterpiece. All the wonderings and amusements also helped me in digging out information related to the painting and the runarounds as well. I will not try to differentiate the different topics because if I do, it will take more than five pages to describe the obvious difference between the three. What is worth noting to understand and to know will be the process on how I arrived in such analysis of every topic or subject and the factors that could have affected my personal point of views. The painting for example, its uniqueness and brilliant colors took over my admiration from other things just notice the significance and beauty that it hides (in the museum). Why was I amused with the painting in the first place? Like any other start, curiosity usually takes over after amusement. This process is the normal reaction after a material element does its job in arousing likeness and admiration. The next thing can be research and questioning on what’s what and why it all arrived to a certain masterpiece such that a mother puts to sleep a baby while staring at the nothingness. The critiquing and the questioning arrived by the time comparison started. It brought a more powerful mind that gave notice to minor details such as the orange face of the lady and the sunflowers mentioned in the paper. Had it been an ordinary painting, the description could have just laid bear the surrounding. But this is not to praise the article I made lest it will be self-serving. But then again, how the painting made me think of its significance may be significant enough to tell the message. This first homework has created a difference in me. I became more than just an observer. Going to the second paper that I wrote, my mind further bargained for information not because I needed to know it but because I needed to understand the idea of the text in the subject. It talked of Foucault and his masterpiece as well. Like the other paper, I needed to talk of the piece as another interesting topic to be tackled. I did not beg for an inspiration to finish the paper because anything extraordinary is worth tackling or talking about. This I could say because the subject on Foucault brought more ideas at hand. Why it became interesting can all be related to the eyes and the windows that went pouring in the whole text. The imaginary town as for me appeared at first to be very fundamental but later on shifted to a big metaphor of the eyes. Supervision and molded, the people would soon be brought to the world they couldn’t have imagined. The comparison of the buildings in the real world and the text made the project illuminating. It would like looking through an eyeball or at least a bulb which usually signals new ideas. The comparison between Foucault’s imaginary world to the living element of the society is just another way to reiterate the moment stated in the text. The third paper on the other hand suggested an affair between the truth and unreal when the situation becomes ironic. The whole thing was an irony between a story teller and one seeking for truth. So many times have we heard from different fictionists and storytellers quests and stories that try to stress out points that are missing through another missing element? Indirectly, the focus was coordinated through the missing link, mainly the truth. I would understand that sometimes, direct explanation can be boring. Now perhaps that could be the same thing why O’ Brien told the war story, the unbelievable can actually create the believable truth about Niezche’s ideas. But more than irony, truth seeking, information digging and submerging to facts, the three assignments or paper works brought about deep understanding that appeared to be common of the three. What then made each assignment different? Aside form the topic, the levels of understanding also differed. I would say, the most difficult was the third one and the easiest, the first one. That can be based on the subjective judgment as a writer and investigator of the topics. Serious topics need serious research and understanding, that could be true. The bias may appear on personal approach as ideas and reactions vary also. But what is important right now basically is to finally say that the three topics and or subjects ranging from a painting in the museum, to an extraordinary text by Foucault and finally to a truth-finding issue of Niezche, there is nothing but one good approach to a subject, to know and understand it and from one’s point of view, show its meaning. The realization to this therefore would be better if done personally and not on how others reacted. I like it when I say I like something directly. I like it more when the discussion goes deeper and becomes unexpected. Perfectly, it can’t be avoided when new topics arise in the middle of discussion. Being limited to the topic may not be too god for the explanation of the subject. It also may not be good to be covering too much as well. With the three papers I presented, I am proud to say that more than just making myself a creative thinker, it also made me flexible to putting to balance all the information gathered to obtain exactly the desired path of the discussion in a paper. SOURCES Read More