Download file to see previous pages...
text, the “Firm Balk at Gay Wedding” can be viewed as demonstrative of both ethical dilemmas raised by gay marriages and the way it can make interests of people clash.
To start with, the gist of the article is a controversy concerning the human rights and religious views of a person as far as gay marriages often make these considerations collide. For instance, as it was explained in the article “Firms Balk on Gay Weddings” by Nathan Koppel and Ashby Johnes, people refused to serve wedding ceremonies of gay couples as it would insult their religious convictions. (Koppel & Johnes) Subsequently, there raises the dilemma of whether it is ethically right to deny gay couples services due to personal views. Obviously, there could be various opinions on this question, depending on the approach one uses.
From the duty-based ethics, a person who denies services to a gay couple is right as far as he/she does it due to believing in immorality of such relationships. The basics of the given theory are found in the works of Immanuel Kant, one of the most influential proponents of deontology. According to it, a person is morally obliged to act accordingly to a set of principle and rules, regardless of whether an outcome would be good or bad. (Shakil) Putting it in other words, the only criterion to evaluate the ethics or morality of a decision or action is this action or decision itself. Subsequently, applying this theory to the situation described in the article, it is right to allow people to deny serving a gay couple if they act in accordance with their religious beliefs.
In contrast, the given situation can be regarded as wrong when appealing to the outcome-based ethics that obliges to evaluate the degree of morality of an action or intention on the basis of the consequences it will bring. ("Consequentialism," 2014) Subsequently, the fact that business owners denied gay people an access to the services, such as “baking cakes for the ceremonies” is wrong
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Different religions and cultures have different views about human sexuality. Hindus also believe in having sexual relations with one at a time. However, all the religions advocate heterosexuality rather than homosexuality. In other words gay relationships or lesbianism are unacceptable to religions. Traditionally and historically, sex is assumed as a divine act performed between two persons of opposite sex.
Purcell stated that same-sex marriage first came into the forefront of the news and controversy in mid-199, when three same-sex couples challenged the Hawaiian Supreme Court for their right to marry. The Supreme Court ruled that the decision by the state “might be unconstitutional” (29).
The term ethics is primarily concerned with distinguishing between something that is morally good from bad in the way individuals behave (Rossouw 2004). However, there are some controversies surrounding the concept of ethics in some instances given that people have different perceptions about particular issues in life.
Gay rights advocates believe that it is inequitable and biased to refuse to give certain privileges to any couple, gay or not. For example, marriage enables spouses to receive insurance through their partners’ employers. They are also allowed many other rights such as the ability to make decisions for their partner who is being hospitalized, have the right to sue on their partner’s behalf and cannot be forced to testify against them in court.
More and more, gay couples are insisting that they receive the same legal rights that the traditional, heterosexual married couples receive. Gay rights advocates believe that it is inequitable and biased to refuse to give certain privileges to any couple, gay or not.
Name Class Instructor Date Human Rights and Same-Sex Marriage Introduction There is no human rights violation in denying the legalization of same-sex marriages. In order to push through with this claim, it is first necessary to classify marriage as a civil matter and not a religious one.
It is enough to remember Sparta, where the pupils were the lovers of their supervisors and lived in their houses. In Ancient Greece, there existed homosexual relations that were even legalized by means of a legal procedure. It can easily be derived from the antique Roman and Greek literature that homosexuality was a common thing.
The author explains that there are diverse parties involved in defining the morality of same-sex marriage. Proponents of the practice highlight that it embraces moral. Based on opponents’ standpoint, same-sex parenting practice presents complex choices to different parties. Consequently, the parties involved are compelled to adopt societal norms.
One of the examples of such confusion can be the consistently ongoing debate over gay marriages not only in US but also in other parts of the world. However there is a large group of people that do not
The author of this essay touches on the biological research done and the factors that drive some people to embrace the idea and end up in same-sex marriages or relationships. Comparison of the laws in various places also institutes the discussion part as many states do not embrace the idea
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Ethical dilemma about the same sex marriage for FREE!