Analysis of Newspoll Investigation - Report Example

Research Evaluation-Newspoll Report The Newspoll research presents clear objective with research questions stated to achieve an objective. This is a case where the research has been structured using specific questions to produce results, interpreting data and predicting the outcome of the research aims. Beginning with the research philosophy, Newspoll results on Shorten, Abbott and two-party misses some critical elements. A research philosophy is a belief and understanding of how data should be collected and analysed. Within this context, the ratings on Abbott and Shorten’s performances have been succinctly put with definite strategy established on how it looked towards developing the relationship between research objectives and questions so that findings and data gathering and analysis can be interpreted in a specific paradigm. The research/poll aimed at assessing the performance of Abbott, and Shorten and two party preferred and primary vote. However, it has to be noted that research aims and objectives are the key underlying issues on which the research bases its strategy and philosophy. Asking questions such as “are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the way Tony Abbot is doing his job as Prime Minister” does not consider divergent views on what constitute research philosophy. In other words, respondents should be given a chance to answer this question with regard to Shorten’s performances and not only his opponents (Abbott). The second element is the research design. Basically, the information and the conclusion made gives on how Newspoll surveyed respondents from each State. The collection of the data through survey has helped the research process to succinctly determine the outcome of the study. The question that should be asked is, ‘what was the research design and how was it determined’ owing to the fact that Abbott and Shorten for instance are from different regions. Therefore results of the Newspoll lack sub-section where respondents were from. The general approach of research design and methods is that the sub-sections describe a particular region and topic which is followed by ways of testing or measuring responses from participants. Otherwise, it is possible to argue that Newspoll only interviewed respondents from Shorten strongholds. When deciding on research design, there is need for the application of the methods of the natural sciences to the study of social reality and beyond. The Newspoll has integrated different methods and strategies to the study of social reality thus giving objective views in place of subjective ones. An interview question such as, ‘if a federal election for the House of Representatives was held today, which one of the following would you vote for?’ attempt to solve key objectives of the research. Secondly, the general objective of this question is to find a preferred candidate but why did they collect these data and not others? The answer is that phenomena should be isolated and the observations should be repeatable. There ought to be a question that gives respondents different views of expressing themselves so that it is deductive and as knowledge is arrived at through the gathering of facts, the research is able to conclude from objective viewpoint. Conversely, the poll process and result makes it easy to comprehend the differences between the 1161 respondents interviewed and the objects of the natural sciences. It is for this reason that the poll, basing on ‘BETTER PRIME MINISTER” table has managed to compute insights, beliefs and values to provide adequate justification for a phenomenon or the research question comparing Abbott and Shorten’s performances. The research was a quantitative data collection using a survey method. Newspoll reported that it was a survey conducted on the telephone interviews this concretizing the quantitative method adopted. First, it has to be noted that Newspoll’s of adoption of survey is recommended especially when the scope of the research is taken into consideration. The researcher was dealing with respondents from different regions therefore interviews improve the reliability of research in the sense that it helps in measuring the degree to which the research instrument yield consistent results or data after a repeated administration. However, it does not establish whether the interview was repeated and if so, were the results consistent? In addition, the method used has failed to establish whether the interview responses were able to mix (or integrate or link) the different forms of data concurrently (poll on the performance of Abbott and Shorten preferred party etc), by combining them (or merging them), sequentially and having one build on the other, or embedding one within the other. Thirdly, the method used is limited in the sense that it does not give priority to one or both forms of data (in terms of what the research emphasizes and what respondents emphasize). In totality, the research method adopted (interviews) suited the need to provide answers to the research questions, bearing in mind the complexity of the study location. Generally, it was able to test the correlation between respondents’ perception of leaders and the party and their performances. As stated, the poll study adopted quantitative research to employ a set of predefined procedures systematically in order to collect evidence, answer questions and produce new findings that are applicable beyond the existing boundaries of study. The outcome or conclusion of the research method is that there is massive support for the coalition — where state Labor is regaining power — jumped to a 12-month high of 42 per cent. While this has been the conclusion made by the quantitative method adopted, it failed to consider one critical element; the perception of the respondents and specific views held by the respondents other than specific questions captured in the interview questions. This consideration in turn would have suggested strategies respondents have on performance of these leaders which ought to have been deciphered through a qualitative rather than a quantitative approach. This is because perception needs the researcher to have in-depth interviews and reliable information in the quantitative data to extract the respondents’ level of perception of the importance of the subject matter. Strategies of data analysis are other elements of research methodology that should be assessed. It refers to the process of interpreting data collected through the poll survey so as to understand feelings and perceptions of people regarding their political leaders and parties. The variety and the extent of the data sources used in the poll study enabled analysis of the data collected to provide precise information regarding the perfection of citizens on the leaders and political parties. It also offered more definite evidence of the reliability and validity of the research. The investigation of the problem from different angles adds confidence to the researcher in the findings and allowed drawing of a complete picture and a full understanding of the situation of the leaders and their parties from varied direction. In addition, the tabulation of the data in the table as presented performances from months of 2014 and 2015. This approach allowed the researcher to compensate for any deficiencies that might occur during the data collection. On data analysis, the research used single approach of reducing and organising data to produce findings. The single approach was a preliminary exploration of the data collected through the structured interviews. This was followed by the development of themes through the aggregation of the coded data and deciphering common ground or connections among the themes. It is for this reason that the research managed to develop the tables as presented. Ultimately, the analysis as shown in the table presented a succinct description of the core deductions drawn in regard to the overall study and in line with the study questions respondents were asked. The research validity and reliability was enhanced. Beginning with validity the supervisors of this poll research evaluated each stage of the study, including the data collection instruments adopted such as interview questions. This can be confirmed through attributes such as “the data has been weighted to reflect the population distribution.’ Reliability was enhanced through the adoption of a mixed -method approach to research. Specifically, it has been explained that there was a margin the research considered and in this case there was sampling error of plus or minus 3 per cent points. Based on the sample population, the research interviewed a total of 1161 people. First, the sample collected is reflective enough in the sense that the poll is conducted fortnightly using but on different regions. However, the research has not established reasons as to why 1161 individual was ideal and the criteria it used to select the population owing to the fact that Australia is vast. It can be asked, ‘on what merit did they arrive at the figure?’ The research based on the sample size is valid for the entire population but may need adjustment for a certain group of people especially where one is dealing with larger group or region. A sample population that has been chosen randomly or arbitrarily means a research that will be able to validate its hypotheses and research questions. However, it has to be noted that the poll survey may need to vary its sample size depending on the region. Read More

The Newspoll has integrated different methods and strategies to the study of social reality thus giving objective views in place of subjective ones. An interview question such as, ‘if a federal election for the House of Representatives was held today, which one of the following would you vote for?’ attempt to solve key objectives of the research. Secondly, the general objective of this question is to find a preferred candidate but why did they collect these data and not others? The answer is that phenomena should be isolated and the observations should be repeatable.

There ought to be a question that gives respondents different views of expressing themselves so that it is deductive and as knowledge is arrived at through the gathering of facts, the research is able to conclude from objective viewpoint. Conversely, the poll process and result makes it easy to comprehend the differences between the 1161 respondents interviewed and the objects of the natural sciences. It is for this reason that the poll, basing on ‘BETTER PRIME MINISTER” table has managed to compute insights, beliefs and values to provide adequate justification for a phenomenon or the research question comparing Abbott and Shorten’s performances.

The research was a quantitative data collection using a survey method. Newspoll reported that it was a survey conducted on the telephone interviews this concretizing the quantitative method adopted. First, it has to be noted that Newspoll’s of adoption of survey is recommended especially when the scope of the research is taken into consideration. The researcher was dealing with respondents from different regions therefore interviews improve the reliability of research in the sense that it helps in measuring the degree to which the research instrument yield consistent results or data after a repeated administration.

However, it does not establish whether the interview was repeated and if so, were the results consistent? In addition, the method used has failed to establish whether the interview responses were able to mix (or integrate or link) the different forms of data concurrently (poll on the performance of Abbott and Shorten preferred party etc), by combining them (or merging them), sequentially and having one build on the other, or embedding one within the other. Thirdly, the method used is limited in the sense that it does not give priority to one or both forms of data (in terms of what the research emphasizes and what respondents emphasize).

In totality, the research method adopted (interviews) suited the need to provide answers to the research questions, bearing in mind the complexity of the study location. Generally, it was able to test the correlation between respondents’ perception of leaders and the party and their performances. As stated, the poll study adopted quantitative research to employ a set of predefined procedures systematically in order to collect evidence, answer questions and produce new findings that are applicable beyond the existing boundaries of study.

The outcome or conclusion of the research method is that there is massive support for the coalition — where state Labor is regaining power — jumped to a 12-month high of 42 per cent. While this has been the conclusion made by the quantitative method adopted, it failed to consider one critical element; the perception of the respondents and specific views held by the respondents other than specific questions captured in the interview questions. This consideration in turn would have suggested strategies respondents have on performance of these leaders which ought to have been deciphered through a qualitative rather than a quantitative approach.

This is because perception needs the researcher to have in-depth interviews and reliable information in the quantitative data to extract the respondents’ level of perception of the importance of the subject matter. Strategies of data analysis are other elements of research methodology that should be assessed.

Read More