Analysis of Aggression in the World - Speech or Presentation Example

Aggression in the World Your name Institutional Affiliations “Mr. Chairman, I must term this discussion that we are having today as being wider than all of us expected.” This was the opening sentence of Nehru, Prime minister of India, immediately after taking the front.” This is because the discussion of today will cover a major heading. I am convinced beyond any doubt that this meeting today will cause an impact to the rest of the world. A few minutes ago, we have just had an opportunity to hear from a man who is rare but whenever he opens his mouth, people around him get wisdom. He has explained to us clearly what leaders should do or not do. Confidently, we can all say that he has given us a very strong statement of what I could call one side of representing the views of one of the major blocs existing currently across the world. I have no doubt at all that an equally able disposition can be well made on the part of the other bloc.” “My position in these two blocs is that I don’t belong to either and I propose to belong to none of them no matter what happens.” Nehru uses very kind words in his speech. In fact, he says that he is only proposing.” We all ought to make up our minds and decide if we have to stand alone, we will stand by ourselves. This is because we all know that together we shall stand but divided we fall. He sounds like a learned fellow because he even uses proverbs.” At the same time, we must have the courage to confidently say that regardless of the results of these decisions, we are ready to face all the consequences that will come up.” Nehru seems to be good at convincing the crowd as he even prepares them physiologically. “We do not agree at all agree with the teachings that communist have neither those of ant- communist. The reason as to why we must make stern decisions is because beliefs are all built under wrong ideas and principles. “He uses descriptive language such as stern descions and again does not leave his audience with questions since he gave them the reasons for what he is telling them.” I have never challenged the power of my country to defend itself and I will never ever do that”. He is open-minded and talks even about his belief.”We can only agree today and today only that we will be ready to defend ourselves with whatever arms we have and with the strength that is within us.” He also knows how to sweet-talk people, for instance, he uses words like “today and today only” to emphasize what he is talking about. “I am certain and all of you can bear me witness that no country can ever conquer India and even a bomb may it be made of an atom or hydrogen cannot blast India. I know very well that there are some countries which are so powerful but at the same time we must never think that we can rely on others despite the powers they might have. “He is a good adviser as he lets the audience know that they don’t have to rely on others for help.” “It is a normal thing that every country makes mistakes at one time or another. In this journey that we are about to begin today, we must all be aware that things will come up. That is, we will at some point make mistakes but what we must bear in mind is that the worst thing we will do is to start pointing fingers at one another.” Nehru also makes use of figures of speech such as pointing fingers at one another in his speech. “My advice to all of us is that when such moments come up, the best thing we can do is to realize that we will have to join our efforts together and rise again.” Nehru seems to be an optimistic man as he encourages the audience never to give up. “The plain truth is that the mistakes that our country does and those committed by other countries can never affect the rest of the world but those made by Great Powers have the capacity to cause a terrible catastrophe. I speak about these with a lot of respect to the Great Powers because they are not only powerful in terms of war but they are also known to have taken the top positions in the world’s development, culture and civilization.” This shows that Nehru is appreciative and caring as he uses correct choice of words. According to Russell (2008), “when the Great Powers begin to look at everything they would want to attain in terms of military strength, the consequence these are that the overwhelming might of one country conquers the rest of the world.” Nehru is knowledgeable he quotes the words of other great speakers.” It is the state of mind that almost everything can be achieved if a country has a strong military that makes countries to enter into war. “As much as I am concerned, we ought to make up our minds that no matter the types of war that break up, our firm decisions still remain that we will not take part in it. In order to do this, all of us ought to get to a point where each of us must be ready to defend one another at all cost.” At this stage, the audience is leaning forward and seems to be in agreement with Nehru, who continues and says that “In my view, if our country decides to join any of the two power blocs, then it is definite that we will lose our identity as India” This is an evidence of non-verbal language, the fact that the audience is leaning forward shows that they are getting what he is saying.” If the whole world was to be split between the two super powers, then there is no doubt that the result could be an evitable war. “Many of us sitting here today are not in agreement with the communist ideology at all and don’t support their beliefs. I have been an optimistic person in all my life and I will never be an “antagonistic” person. Has it gotten to this point, where leaders that are supposed to be giving the world direction in religion and other sectors of life have the courage to tag on this type of a movement?” Nehru uses rhetoric questions in his speech which he allows people to think farther. “This is not only something that is degrading, but it is also humiliating to any self-respecting person. It is therefore, an intolerable thought to me that Asian and African states- which term themselves as being great- should come out of bondage and get into freedom and start to degrade and humiliate themselves that way.” Nehru realizes that some of the people are nodding. Nodding is the use of non-verbal skills; it is great evidence that the speech is effective. “Today, I submit to you that every state that has entered into agreement with any of the so termed power blocs has not only invited insecurity in their country, but also added more challenges in their countries. If such countries didn’t enter into contract with these powers, they would not be facing these kind of fears or even live in fear. When the security of a nation is lulled, citizens do not only live in fear, but also the political, social and economic sector is negatively affected. To avoid the stress of dealing with all these outcomes, we must all view this meeting as a major reason why we must not get in contract with any of these blocs. Nehru is stern and warns.” “It is due to the knowledge that we are currently the era of atomic and hydrogen-bomb.” Nehru is knowledgeable as he uses vocabularies such as colossuses.” This is an age where the whole concept of war, politics and even peace has changed. We are now living in a time where whatever generals and soldiers in the past knew is now useless. Soldiers don’t know clearly what this means and neither do they know its implications or its use.” “The whole conception of war has now changed and there is no precedent about the whole military thing” Nehru uses references from other speakers so as to be more convincing. “Something interesting that we should note according to Wilson (2009) is that a nation is powerful in its ruin than the other. That is what Brain (2007) meant when he said that the point of saturation had been reached.” Nehru uses idioms so as to ensure people keep awake.” To hit the nail at the end, it we will never come to a point where we will say that there can be victory in the world.” “It can be agreed that may be the reason as to why people refrain from going to war is because of the idea they have in mind that we may never reach a day where we can say there is victory. As much as the leaders not only here in India, but across the world may want to refrain from going to war, something usually comes up and there is war and complete ruin. When there is any violence at any place in the world, there is a big probability that the outcome will be war.” “The core reason for gathering here at Riom city is to make all countries present in this meeting to realize the situation in the world. If today a war breaks up, there is a probability that it will lead to an enormous war. Today if war block out and tactical weapons are used, the next big step would be to employ big atomic bomb. Total destruction will result if war break out and it will not only be in countries engaged in war, but considering the same way radioactive waves spread, the war will spread across the world.” Nehru uses preposition he compares spreading of radioactive rays and war. “This is the position that we are holding today when looking at where the world is currently. Thank you.” As Nehru, a short man in a well ironed grey suit sat down, all eyes seemed to be on him. There was great silence meaning Nehru’s speech had been delivered home. References Brain, P. (2007). Multidisciplinary Studies on Aggression: World Meeting of the International Society for Research on Aggression. New York: Elsevier. Geen, R. and Donnerstein, E. (1998). Human Aggression: Theories, Research, and Implications for Social Policy. New York: Elsevier. Kegley, C. and Blanton, S. (2010). World Politics: Trend and Transformation 2010-2011. New York: Cengage Learning. Russell, G. (2008). Aggression in the Sports World: A Social Psychological Perspective. Oxford University: Oxford University Press. Stone, J. and Ferencz, B. (1958). Aggression And World Order: A Critique of United Nations Theories of Aggression. London: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. Wilson, P. (2009). Aggression, Crime and International Security: Moral, Political and Legal Dimensions of International Relations. New York: Taylor & Francis. Read More

” He also knows how to sweet-talk people, for instance, he uses words like “today and today only” to emphasize what he is talking about. “I am certain and all of you can bear me witness that no country can ever conquer India and even a bomb may it be made of an atom or hydrogen cannot blast India. I know very well that there are some countries which are so powerful but at the same time we must never think that we can rely on others despite the powers they might have. “He is a good adviser as he lets the audience know that they don’t have to rely on others for help.

” “It is a normal thing that every country makes mistakes at one time or another. In this journey that we are about to begin today, we must all be aware that things will come up. That is, we will at some point make mistakes but what we must bear in mind is that the worst thing we will do is to start pointing fingers at one another.” Nehru also makes use of figures of speech such as pointing fingers at one another in his speech. “My advice to all of us is that when such moments come up, the best thing we can do is to realize that we will have to join our efforts together and rise again.

” Nehru seems to be an optimistic man as he encourages the audience never to give up. “The plain truth is that the mistakes that our country does and those committed by other countries can never affect the rest of the world but those made by Great Powers have the capacity to cause a terrible catastrophe. I speak about these with a lot of respect to the Great Powers because they are not only powerful in terms of war but they are also known to have taken the top positions in the world’s development, culture and civilization.

” This shows that Nehru is appreciative and caring as he uses correct choice of words. According to Russell (2008), “when the Great Powers begin to look at everything they would want to attain in terms of military strength, the consequence these are that the overwhelming might of one country conquers the rest of the world.” Nehru is knowledgeable he quotes the words of other great speakers.” It is the state of mind that almost everything can be achieved if a country has a strong military that makes countries to enter into war.

“As much as I am concerned, we ought to make up our minds that no matter the types of war that break up, our firm decisions still remain that we will not take part in it. In order to do this, all of us ought to get to a point where each of us must be ready to defend one another at all cost.” At this stage, the audience is leaning forward and seems to be in agreement with Nehru, who continues and says that “In my view, if our country decides to join any of the two power blocs, then it is definite that we will lose our identity as India” This is an evidence of non-verbal language, the fact that the audience is leaning forward shows that they are getting what he is saying.

” If the whole world was to be split between the two super powers, then there is no doubt that the result could be an evitable war. “Many of us sitting here today are not in agreement with the communist ideology at all and don’t support their beliefs. I have been an optimistic person in all my life and I will never be an “antagonistic” person. Has it gotten to this point, where leaders that are supposed to be giving the world direction in religion and other sectors of life have the courage to tag on this type of a movement?

” Nehru uses rhetoric questions in his speech which he allows people to think farther. “This is not only something that is degrading, but it is also humiliating to any self-respecting person. It is therefore, an intolerable thought to me that Asian and African states- which term themselves as being great- should come out of bondage and get into freedom and start to degrade and humiliate themselves that way.” Nehru realizes that some of the people are nodding. Nodding is the use of non-verbal skills; it is great evidence that the speech is effective.

Read More