The crisis in Ukraine - Report Example

Name: Course: Institution: Date: Crisis in Ukraine. Country: Russia Introduction Crisis in Ukraine, which largely began as an internal conflict, can currently be understood from the perspective of an international conflict due to the involvement of Russia (White & Valentina 23). The evolution of the crisis and the rising tension was a demonstration of the inability of the international community, especially the United Nations through its Security Council to act in a situation that threatened peace in both Russia and Ukraine. The failure by Ukrainian allies such as the US and European Union to intervene in what was perceived as a less critical crisis enabled Russia to demonstrate its power within the region by making punctual decisions even as the crisis evolved (Kissinger 90). The main objective of this paper is to identify and discuss possible resolution tha the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) can initiate to ensure an end to the crisis from the Russian perspective. Possible resolutions The first resolution to the crisis in Ukraine would require the United Nations to initiate a procedure focused on solving the trade dispute that exists between the European Union, Ukraine and the Russian federation. The second resolution that would help the United Nations Security Council to develop effective measures towards solving the Ukraine crisis is the inclusion of Russia into the peaceful negotiations initiatives that have been planned by the European Union and the US. The third resolution that to be subjected to the decision by the United Nations from the Russian perspective is the need for Ukraine to ensure a continuity of the economic and logistical interdependence that the two countries have enjoyed over numerous centuries. Ukraine should accept the verdict by the people of Crimea on their intention to join Russia There is need for the UNSC to caution and sanction the efforts by the European Union to expand eastwards into Ukraine Analysis of the resolutions Solving the trade dispute Prior to the beginning of the crisis the EU and Ukraine had an intention of increasing the intensity and levels of trade with the aid of the association agreement. This intention was often objected by Russia which through the media accused the EU and Ukraine of blackmail and the intention to allocate Russia more taxes on the goods that Russia could import from Ukraine (White & Valentina 24). The conflict began with protests from the Russian federation and later degenerated into an armed conflict. Currently, Ukraine is facing a shaky cease fire, but the process of developing a lengthy and sustainable solution would be through the commencement of discussions on how to end the trade dispute (Kissinger 70). The decision by the European Union, in the view of the Russian Federation, to begin partial implementation of the associating agreement can be said to have been biased against Russia. This is because such leveled type of implementation was opened the border for Ukraine goods (Kissinger 72). Despite this opening the agreement delayed the implementation of the free trade zone for European Union products coming into Ukraine (Cash 48). The solution to the crisis could only be realized when the objections from Russia concerning the membership of Ukraine into the EU could be understood in terms of trade. Russian argue that the association agreement allowed Ukraine to bring goods from the EU duty free but later re-export them to Russia hence circumventing Russian tariffs on the perceived EU products (Cash 50). An all-inclusive peaceful negotiation initiative The European Union and the US have been engaged in natives of organizing peaceful negotiations between the warring factions in Ukraine. These attempts for negotiations have been viewed as biased and only generating partial and ineffective solutions to the crisis (White & Valentina 40). Russia plays an integral part in the crisis that is currently prevailing in Ukraine and therefore an effective and most efficient solution can be realized when all the factions involved in the war are included in the negotiations (Kriesberg 255). Russia has continuously been accused of planning to advocate for its own interests instead of those of the people of Ukraine and Crimea. These allegations must be perceived as ill motivated and intended to seclude Russia from the entire process. The US and the EU when perceived in relation to Russia can be said to be intruders to the conflict (Kriesberg 257). The intention to propagate western desires and institute the hegemonic power of the US within the region can be said to be the intentions of these country. The sanctions levied against Russia and Ukraine has been used as power weapons to ensure a reduction in the level of involvement by the Russian federation (White & Valentina 41). The only third party to the process of initiating peaceful negotiation to the crisis is the UN. This is because the organization, being non-partisan, to the ongoing stalemate will be engaged in an initiative aimed at building some form of consensus and evaluates the most appropriate procedure to adopt to ensure a win-win situation for all the members involved (Kissinger 74). The promotion of national interests is often the objective of every state in an international conflict. However, through an all-inclusive negation process, the nations can develop agreements and consensus on the best way to ensure that the stalemate ends (Kriesberg 258). Continuity of the economic and logistical interdependence Since the independence of Ukraine, the rise and fall of the Soviet Union and the development of the Russian Federation, the two countries have been involved in the development of numerous economic and logistical agreements (White & Valentina 43). These treaties have for many years provided a platform for mutual benefits by the two countries. The prolonged crisis in Ukraine must therefore be perceived as one aimed at completely severing these ties. The decision by Russia to acquire Crimea as part of its protectorate from Ukraine is bound to create more rifts in the associations between the two countries (Kissinger 75). Inasmuch as the crisis may be a major disadvantage to the economic and logistical benefits that the Russians enjoyed, it would a catastrophe to the people of Ukraine since they acquired more benefits that their Russian counterparts (Kriesberg 259). The success of the desire by Russia and Ukraine to protect the ties would only be realized if the United Nations through the Security Council could delay the full implementation of the economic part of the Association Agreement between the EU and Ukraine. Such delay could only be successful if it was used as platform of assessing the underlying economic benefits of the agreement (Cash 25). In addition, the delay will also assist the Russian Federation to realize the impending setbacks or challenges that are inherent in the agreement and begin a process of developing different procedures aimed at channeling the agreement towards an all-beneficial and all inclusive agreement (White & Valentina 46). The crisis in the view of Russians can also be perceived as an attempt by the western democracies to escalate their relations with the Russian Federation. The crisis is therefore being used as platform for advocating for the policy of containment agent Russian (Kriesberg 270). For many decades, on the view of Russian the policy has often been followed religiously with constant alterations of tactics towards it implementation. The desire by western democracies to dominate over Russia since the years of the Cold War can be used in explaining the current crisis in Ukraine (Kissinger 80). It is the responsibility of the UNSC to ensure that the Russian Federation is protected against ill- intended power relations aimed at controlling the Russian federation. For this to be realized it will be necessary for the concerned movement to address the crisis in Ukraine from the political, economic and social fronts and minimize the possibility of dominion by the western democracies over the desires of the Russian federation (Wilson 108). In addition, the United Nations must seek to restore the economic and logistical ties between the two countries to deny the US the possibility of exerting its unilateral control over countries that are perceived to be independent (Cash 26). Secession of Crimea The people of Crimea, through their rights and autonomy unanimously voted to secede from Ukraine into Russia. This decision has been a major source of conflict between Ukraine and Russia. In addition, several nation states tha have been perceived as allies to Ukraine such as the US and EU states have argued and criticized this decision (Kissinger 79). The high levels of criticism demonstrated in this conflict have been attributed to the setting of unwanted precedents for other state that are part of different unions on the global platform (White & Valentina 47). According to Russian, the decision to secede can only be viewed from the perspective of the desire to be free and to join a federation that would ensure their success in terms of political socio-cultural and economic growth. It is the responsibility of the UNSC to ensure that the decision by the Crimea is respected and upheld in accordance with their desires (Kriesberg 271). The role of the Russian Federation, in the view of Russians, is to protect the interests of natives and ethnic groups from the country. Crimea is largely populated by Russians and the secession is therefore a platform for protecting such population from any possible harm by foreign nations (Kriesberg 278). In addition, the existing levels of lawlessness within the country can also be said to be an indication of the high levels of incompetence from the government of Ukraine. This leads to the development of questions regarding the ability of Kiev to protect every individual within its jurisdiction (Cash 30). President Putin, while advocating for the interest of native Russian argues that Moscow is not imposing its will on Crimea and Ukraine. Instead the country has the desire of upholding and supporting the free decision by a largely defenseless population (Cash 34). This is in relation to the support tha the western democracies gave to Kosovo in 2008 when the country declared its independence from Serbia. Any form of opposition will be a demonstration of bias against the interest of the people of Crimea but the recognition of this choice by the United Nations would serve to protect the Crimea from interventions by the allied of Ukraine (Wilson 100). Caution and sanction the European Union and its allies Prior to the crisis in Ukraine, the European Union with the support of the US was in the process of realizing an expansionist agenda into the eastern part of the Ukraine. This was being realized through the introduction of an association agreement that was bound to advocate for the interest of the EU and the US in trade and political platforms (Kriesberg 280). The expansionist ideology in the view of Russian is perceived as a technique of allowing the involvement of other western institutions into the affairs of the eastern part of Europe. This will not only destabilize the existing peace but it will also populate the few avail be markets (Kissinger 88). The introduction of the European Union’s Eastern Partnership program for instance, was a technique through which the EU develops an association between six former Eastern Bloc states. However, in the view of Russia, this in an attempt to introduce other organizations such as NATO whose expansionist ideologies into the east has often been perceived as a security threat to Russia (Kissinger 86). The role of Ukraine in this entire crisis is therefore to provide western democracies with a platform for entry and domination of different eastern affairs. Through such an involvement, it would be easier for NATO, the EU and the US to manipulate Russia into treaties that will not only mean losses to the nation but also ensure that it loses its influence in the east (Kissinger 88). Conclusion The Ukraine crisis which began as an internal conflict has transformed into an international conflict due to the involvement of other partisan states such as the US and the EU states. The decision by Russian to become part of the crisis was based on the realization that the crisis was intended to stabilize its authority in the eastern region. This explains why it would be important to seek the intervention of the UN as a way of ensuring that the stalemate is resolved in a way tha ensures a win-win situation for Russian s and Ukraine with the exclusion of other partisan states. Works cited Cash, William. Forty-fourth Report of Session 2013-14: Documents Considered by the Committee on 26 March 2014, Including the Following Recommendations for Debate : the Posting of Workers Europe for Citizens Programme 2014-20 : Ukraine and Russia: Eu Restrictive Measures : Report, Together with Formal Minutes. London: The Stationery Office, 2014. Internet resource. Kissinger, Henry. World Order. New York, New York: The Penguin Press, 2014. Internet resource. Kriesberg, Louis. Realizing Peace: A Constructive Conflict Approach. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2015. Print. White, Stephen, and Valentina Feklyunina. Identities and Foreign Policies in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus: The Other Europes. , 2014. Internet resource. Wilson, Andrew. Ukraine Crisis: What It Means for the West. Oxford University Press: Oxford. 2014. Print. Read More

Despite this opening the agreement delayed the implementation of the free trade zone for European Union products coming into Ukraine (Cash 48). The solution to the crisis could only be realized when the objections from Russia concerning the membership of Ukraine into the EU could be understood in terms of trade. Russian argue that the association agreement allowed Ukraine to bring goods from the EU duty free but later re-export them to Russia hence circumventing Russian tariffs on the perceived EU products (Cash 50).

An all-inclusive peaceful negotiation initiative The European Union and the US have been engaged in natives of organizing peaceful negotiations between the warring factions in Ukraine. These attempts for negotiations have been viewed as biased and only generating partial and ineffective solutions to the crisis (White & Valentina 40). Russia plays an integral part in the crisis that is currently prevailing in Ukraine and therefore an effective and most efficient solution can be realized when all the factions involved in the war are included in the negotiations (Kriesberg 255).

Russia has continuously been accused of planning to advocate for its own interests instead of those of the people of Ukraine and Crimea. These allegations must be perceived as ill motivated and intended to seclude Russia from the entire process. The US and the EU when perceived in relation to Russia can be said to be intruders to the conflict (Kriesberg 257). The intention to propagate western desires and institute the hegemonic power of the US within the region can be said to be the intentions of these country.

The sanctions levied against Russia and Ukraine has been used as power weapons to ensure a reduction in the level of involvement by the Russian federation (White & Valentina 41). The only third party to the process of initiating peaceful negotiation to the crisis is the UN. This is because the organization, being non-partisan, to the ongoing stalemate will be engaged in an initiative aimed at building some form of consensus and evaluates the most appropriate procedure to adopt to ensure a win-win situation for all the members involved (Kissinger 74).

The promotion of national interests is often the objective of every state in an international conflict. However, through an all-inclusive negation process, the nations can develop agreements and consensus on the best way to ensure that the stalemate ends (Kriesberg 258). Continuity of the economic and logistical interdependence Since the independence of Ukraine, the rise and fall of the Soviet Union and the development of the Russian Federation, the two countries have been involved in the development of numerous economic and logistical agreements (White & Valentina 43).

These treaties have for many years provided a platform for mutual benefits by the two countries. The prolonged crisis in Ukraine must therefore be perceived as one aimed at completely severing these ties. The decision by Russia to acquire Crimea as part of its protectorate from Ukraine is bound to create more rifts in the associations between the two countries (Kissinger 75). Inasmuch as the crisis may be a major disadvantage to the economic and logistical benefits that the Russians enjoyed, it would a catastrophe to the people of Ukraine since they acquired more benefits that their Russian counterparts (Kriesberg 259).

The success of the desire by Russia and Ukraine to protect the ties would only be realized if the United Nations through the Security Council could delay the full implementation of the economic part of the Association Agreement between the EU and Ukraine. Such delay could only be successful if it was used as platform of assessing the underlying economic benefits of the agreement (Cash 25). In addition, the delay will also assist the Russian Federation to realize the impending setbacks or challenges that are inherent in the agreement and begin a process of developing different procedures aimed at channeling the agreement towards an all-beneficial and all inclusive agreement (White & Valentina 46).

Read More