StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Political Reflections on the Original American Constitution - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
This paper "Political Reflections on the Original American Constitution" discusses the American Constitution from the perspective of pragmatic politics. The author assesses the text of the original constitution of the United States of America in relation to the political situation of America…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.4% of users find it useful
Political Reflections on the Original American Constitution
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Political Reflections on the Original American Constitution"

Political Reflections on the Original American Constitution In this work, I reflect on the original text of the American Constitution from the perspective of pragmatic politics. I assess the text of the original constitution of the United States of America in relation with the political situation of America during the period. 1.0. Did the original American constitution create a representative democracy, pluralist democracy based on factions, democracy based on a rule of a handful or a hyperpluralism with a weak central government? One best way to answer the question is to use “facts” as documented by the official government archives. According to an official government online archive that was constructed by a consortium of government and private groups1, the original four-page American constitution that established the United States of America was secretly drafted during the summer of 1787 and signed on 17 September 1787 (www.ourdocuments.gov). The official online archive narrated that drafting the constitution met difficulties. Earlier, the Federal Convention met in the State House of Philadelphia on 14 May 1787 but failed to muster a quorum because representatives from only two states managed to attend. Meetings were adjourned several times until a quorum of seven states attended on 25 May (www.ourdocuments.gov). Throughout summer, the delegates discussed, debated, and redrafted the constitution (www.ourdocuments.gov). According to the government archive, the key debates were on the power of the central government, number of representatives, and how representatives may be elected or whether directly by the people or by legislators. A documentation by another official government online archive, www.archives.gov, reported that then General George Washington, reluctantly at first to attend the convention, doubting whether the convention would accomplish something significant and whether men of his stature should attend. The said official government archive reported that Washington “delayed accepting the invitation to attend for several months.” General George Washington was elected unanimously as the president of the constitutional convention that drafted the original constitution that established the US but Virginia delegate James Madison earns a good credit for being a key organizer of the constitutional convention (www.archives.gov). According to the documentation of an official government archive (www.archives.gov), James Madison has been convinced of the “futility and weaknesses of confederacies of independent states” and has been equally convinced that the Articles of Confederation has to be replaced. According to the documentation of an official online government archive, www.archives.gov, the Articles of Confederation had been in-forced since 1781 and merely approximated a “league of friendship” between sovereign and independent states. According to the documentation of the official government online archive, the confederate government “could not tax and was generally impotent in setting commercial policy” and “could not even effectively support a war effort.” As a result of the political weakness of a confederate government, “paper money was flooding the country, creating extraordinary inflation---a pound of tea in some areas could be purchased for a tidy $100.” The hyperinflationary situation of the period probably brought tremendous hardships for the American people. Leaders such as Madison, believed in a strong state as the important key towards achieving economic stability. A weak state implies, for instance, a weak currency. A weak currency implies hyperinflation and hyperinflation means tremendous hardships for agricultural farmers and workers. Madison wanted a strong government to provide order and stability (www.archives.gov). According to the documentation of the official government archive (www.archives.gov), the constitutional convention had its origins in the proposal by Madison and John Tyler in the Virginia assembly that “Continent Congress be given power to regulate commerce through the Confederation” (www.archives.gov). Thus, originally, it appears that the original plan was merely to give Continental Congress the power to revise the Articles of Confederation so that the central government can be stronger in regulating commerce. In other words, the original plan was to modify the Articles of Confederation and was not yet to build a United States of America. This is probably the reason why the debates and the convention had been in secret in the first place. The documentation of the official government online archive even reports that the activities of the constitutional convention held in Philadelphia had been widely viewed as usurpation of congressional authority even if the Congress then issued a call for a convention (www.archives.gov). Representatives of the Rhode Island and Patrick Henry refused to participate in the convention while Jefferson and Adams were abroad on foreign missions (www.archives.gov). On the other hand, other than Washington and Madison, those supporting a United States constitution included Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, George Mason, and many others (www.archives.gov). One of the important debates in framing the constitution was on representation. One proposal was for from Oliver Ellsworth in which representation will be based on number of free persons and 3/5 on all other persons which was a euphemism for slaves (www.archives.gov). There was a tremendous debate on this but many of the delegates that a compromise was necessary to avoid a “complete breakdown” of the convention. Other than this, there were also debates on the issues of slavery and commerce (www.archives.gov). These were the contexts of the version of the US Constitution that was ratified on 17 September 1787. Thus, from the foregoing, it follows that the original constitution of the United States of America reflects our forefathers’ attempt to combat hyperpluralism. The act to establish a constitution of the United States in 1787 was one of our forefathers’ attempts to establish a strong central authority in the United States to combat the mere “friendship of states” in the confederate government. It was also a serious attempt to build a genuinely representative government but the prevailing mind-set of the period failed to see the evils of slavery. Slavery was thought to be normal and natural in the same way that slavery was considered normal and natural in both the Old and New Testaments of the Christian and Jewish bibles. Many of our forefathers’ who formulated the original constitution of the United States were confronted with the possibility of being charged with treason for going against the prevailing positions of their respective states who were for a confederation or a “friendship of states” or a weaker central government. Thus, at that time, it was important to take a moderate posture. Otherwise, there was a risk that the federal government would not have moved forward nor took off. Our more enlightened forefathers had to put the issue of slavery, particularly Negro slaves, temporarily in the background so the more important issue of a relatively strong federal government can take off. Our enlightened forefathers were pragmatic. Slavery is an important issue but the survival of America during that period rested more on the establishment of a strong central authority that can give more impetus for commerce and industry. There was a crisis in the 1780s: hyperinflation and the problem of fragmented markets that were causing much harm both to the agricultural and nascent industrial workers of the period. Our more enlightened forefathers attempted to establish a representative democracy but only managed to achieve an imperfect one. Of course, it can also be argued that what resulted is a government of a handful but this was not the intent of the more enlightened fathers of America. Further, there is inadequate basis to say that it was the rule of factions that dominated early America. The leadership of our forefathers were supported by people’s militias or a mass of people as indicated in the war for independence as well as in the American civil war. 2.0. Were the acts of the founding fathers the American Constitution just or unjust? What is justice? It may inappropriate to assess the justness of the actions of our forefathers given the values and situation of today. Firstly, it was necessary to be politically pragmatic in building America. More so in the situation of 1787 or the year of the ratification of the US constitution. A solution to a problem or an idea of what may constitute as a just or correct arrangement may not be obtained overnight but only after several decades and centuries of labor of humanity. In the same way, slavery was only abolished only after several centuries of existence. To this day, modern slaveries even exist as what can be concluded from the reports of several nongovernmental groups like the Anti-Slavery Society of the United Kingdom. The Old and New Testaments and even the early apostles of Christianity had considered slavery to be normal and not unjust (for example, see Colossians 3:22). The early democracy (some call it the first democracy) in Greece several thousand years ago considered slaves as non-citizens and, therefore, the early Greeks found nothing wrong to deprive them of rights that are exclusive for their republic. We must remember that the United States at that time had been a colony of the British. It took a while for even the early Americans to find that something is wrong with British power lording over the American people. The founding fathers of the future United States of America were whites. The extermination of the native American Indians have been going on prior to the birth of the American Constitution. Have anybody from our enlightened forefathers gave a thought that the they have been enjoying lands that were taken away from the American Indians? Unfortunately, there were ideological blinders the moment that men are born into society. The original framers of our constitution, for example, have managed to see what the lack of a central government authority can bring to Americans. Thus, they were strongly motivated to build a strong America through a stronger central government. Unfortunately, they were unable to see how their race has decimated the men, women, and children of American Indian ancestry. They were unable to see the lack of justice in having slaves or in the existence of slavery. For many of our forefathers, the citizens of the United States were those that were free, those who were not slaves, those who were not negroes, and those who were not Indians. Is the original American constitution just? To answer this, we look into the data of www.uscontitution.net. The first ten amendments known as the bill of rights were only introduced in 15 December 1791 or about four years from the ratification of the original constitution in 1787. This supports the view that the original version of the Constitution was a pragmatic document that attended foremost to the most important need of building the first United States of America. In the original version, issues of slavery and Indian territories were subordinated in favor of the more important task or need of building a central authority. Thus, with the bill of rights or amendments 1 to 10 introduced in 1787, the following rights were enshrined in the constitution: 1) Freedom of religion, press, and expression; 2) Right to bear arms; 3) Right against involuntary quartering by soldiers; 4) Right against unreasonable search and seizures; 5) Right to trial and compensation for takings; 6) Right to speedy trial and confrontation of witnesses; 7) Right to trial by jury in civil cases; 8) Right against unusual punishment; 9) Right against the use of constitution to deny or disparage against certain rights; and 10) Right to reserved rights not granted by people to the United States. The important relevance of pointing this fact out is that when analyzed on its own, it is easy to easy that the original constitution of the United States can be viewed as UNJUST because it does not include the rights articulated by the bill of rights introduced in 1791. However, 1791 is only about 4 years from the ratification of the original constitution in 1787 and as we have pointed out earlier, during that time, it was necessary to stress on the priority issues rather than resolve all issues and lose the chance of establishing a strong United States. Had our forefathers attempted to solve all issues in one single blow, our forefathers may have lost the chance to build a strong United States in 1787 and left the American people to cope with hyperinflation and other economic problems attendant with a weak state. Resolving all issues in a single blow could have led the American nation to chaos. Prolonging the debates in the situation of the 1787 could have led to a situation in which our more enlightened fathers could have been charged for treason in their respective states because they were seeking to put their respective states under the coverage of a United States of America rather than to a mere “friendship of states” under the Confederates. It was only on 6 December 1865 that slavery was abolished through the Constitution in the United States of America. This is in the 13th Amendment of the US Constitution. In the documentation of USconstitution.net, the 13th Amendment of the US Constitution reads as follows, “…neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, nor any place subject to their jurisdiction.” Further, amendment 13 to the US Constitution also required Congress will have to enforce the amendment by appropriate legislation. Thus, going back to the question, were our forefathers who formulated the original US constitution just? It is easy to see that many of our forefathers who formulated the original constitution were federalist but they were for the perpetuation of negro slavery and the slavery of non-Whites! But again, even the first Apostles of Christ were tolerant of slavery and failed to see wrongs in it even with their Church’s teachings of love and serving one’s fellowmen. Slavery is indeed wrong but it took a while for many of our forefathers to realize that it is wrong. The original constitution of the United States did not recognize that situation of the Native American Indians. What is the status of their ancestral lands? How are their claims to be dealt with? Instead, we get a clue from Section 2 of Article I of the US constitution. In Section 2, Article I of the US Constitution, the determination of representation is counted based on free persons, a multiplier of three-fifth of “other persons”, and excludes the untaxed Indians. Of course, the Native American Indians were probably raiding the Whites but, at the same time, the Native American Indians were also defending their land and life. Of course, other than this point, Section 2 Article I of the US constitution confirms that Negro slaves were without rights in the early democratic America. Reading the original American Constitution, it is easy to acquire an impression that our forefathers have been elitist and unjust. However, I maintain that an equally viable hypothesis is that our forefathers were merely pragmatic---solving problems one at a time rather than solving all problems in one blow. Further, a progressive mind-set is something that is only acquired over time. Slavery used to be moral and consistent with what is right. However, the human mind also moves with history and today we consider slavery as unjust. It may be inappropriate to judge the mores of yesteryears with the mores of today. Our forefathers have viewed slavery as just and the notion of justice or just treatment seem to apply only among Whites and non-Indians. Work Cited World Book, Inc. About America: The Constitution of the United States of America with Explanatory Notes adapted from The World Book Encyclopedia. World Book, 2004. Ourdocuments.gov. “Document Info”. Available 15 October 2010 from http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=9 www.archives.gov. “Charters of Freedom: A New World is at Hand”. Retrieved 15 October 2010 from http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_history.html USconstitution.net. “The Constitution of the United States”. Retrieved 15 October 2010 from http://usconstitution.net/const.pdf Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Political Reflections on the Original American Constitution Assignment, n.d.)
Political Reflections on the Original American Constitution Assignment. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/politics/1571247-did-the-original-constitution-create-a-representative-democracy-based-on-elections-a-pluralist-democracy-based-on-factions-some-form-of-elite-system-based-on-rule-by-a-handful-or-hyperpluralism-with-a-weak-central-government-dominated-by-factions-or-s
(Political Reflections on the Original American Constitution Assignment)
Political Reflections on the Original American Constitution Assignment. https://studentshare.org/politics/1571247-did-the-original-constitution-create-a-representative-democracy-based-on-elections-a-pluralist-democracy-based-on-factions-some-form-of-elite-system-based-on-rule-by-a-handful-or-hyperpluralism-with-a-weak-central-government-dominated-by-factions-or-s.
“Political Reflections on the Original American Constitution Assignment”. https://studentshare.org/politics/1571247-did-the-original-constitution-create-a-representative-democracy-based-on-elections-a-pluralist-democracy-based-on-factions-some-form-of-elite-system-based-on-rule-by-a-handful-or-hyperpluralism-with-a-weak-central-government-dominated-by-factions-or-s.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Political Reflections on the Original American Constitution

Politics of Japans Constitutional Reform

The LDP marked the occasion the release of a detailed proposal for revising Japan's constitution.... hellip; Even though constitutional revision has been a formal floorboard of the LDP platform since its establishment in 1955, and even if the party committees have generated recommendations for changing the constitution over the years, the LDP has never offered before the Japanese public an amendment proposal with full party backing.... While one considers that the post-war constitution has never been amended, the historical significance of these developments is inevitable....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The Two Dominant Political Parties of the United States of America

the original thinking of great minds in the early civilization of America either no longer exists or has been aptly altered or transformed.... On the other side of the coin, we have the Republican Party which was founded resultant of in-house fighting among the original democrats of the post-George Washington era.... Of course, there are other groups (like the Libertarian, the constitution and the Green parties) moved by different ideological or causal beliefs but these are seemingly petty pockets which do not require much attention....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Origination, Drafting, and Ratification of the United States Constitution

constitution Introduction Fundamental to the practice of creating a nation and government is the creation of the central rules for legal-political order, the rule for governance within the nation.... A constitution is the backbone of a nation's governance, as it is the key legal, political institution of a country containing the collective decision making conventions specifying the allocation of political power within the nation.... constitution was formulated to have a constitutional order allowing people to participate in decision making through democratic elections....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Book Review of How Democratic Is the American Constitution by Robert A. Dahl second edition

Dahl, touching on the subject matter of democracy and the american constitution.       The american constitution often acts as a reference to the American democracy's foundation.... The reminder is the constitution of American differs greatly from the democratic system only possible basis.... Dahl considers the constitution in the light of issues with consideration of the historical circumstances, which surrounded its creation....
4 Pages (1000 words) Book Report/Review

The American State Court System: History and Organization

Prior to the Revolutionary War— actually, prior to the constitution of the United States being ratified in 1789—state law administration and enforcement were as diverse as the character of the people who settled the colonies.... The constitution of the United States was formally ratified in 1789 and brought with it a very different set of considerations upon which to found the notions of justice and judicial procedure.... The purpose of this paper "The american State Court System: History and Organization” is to discuss the evolution of the state courts from the colonial period, through the post-revolutionary war eras, to how the modern system is constructed today....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment

Political Science: The 1787 Constitution and the Government of the Elite

nbsp; In 1787, the first american constitution was drafted and that this development represented an American revolution of remarkable importance.... (thesis paragraph) (Government Elite) The strong centralized system of government - including the manner in which its most powerful policymaking offices are elected – the US Senate, President of the United States and the judges of the courts - mandated by the first american constitution demonstrated the theory of the Government Elite....
10 Pages (2500 words) Term Paper

Federalization of Crime in America

The american constitution, theoretically, promises to identify oppression and make proper use of criminal law so that rights of citizenship can be protected.... hellip; The basic demand of the inhabitants of a democracy from its constitution, social governance and administration is to obtain the scope for living a peaceful life, respect for the basic rights and being protected from any form of social arbitrariness.... Social history of the United States of America, though is replete with instances of movements for social rights and the US constitution, though is considered as one of the most liberal constitutions in the global context, however, it would not at all be difficult to find such examples that would point out social governance of the nation quite frequently have come up with such initiatives that have confined scopes to respect and evaluate human rights both in social and national context....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

Similarities and Differences between the Australian Labor Party and the American Democrats

The party's constitution describes it as a democratic socialist.... … The paper "Similarities and Differences between the Australian Labor Party and the american Democrats” is a persuasive variant of an essay on politics.... The paper “Similarities and Differences between the Australian Labor Party and the american Democrats” is a persuasive variant of an essay on politics.... It is the oldest political party in Australia....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us