Immigration - Research Paper Example

Sacco and Vanzetti moved from Italy to the United States at different times, but later united through anarchy related revolutionary activities (Carnevale 213). Immigration practices at the time are noteworthy different from today’s handling of the same issue. Immigration of persons at the time was not as strict as today’s. On the same token, there are some immigration practices that were then highly observed, but have turned out to be invalid or irrelevant in the contemporary society. Prior to addressing this issue, it is important to consider that Sacco and Vanzetti were convicted and later executed following murder charges for which they were found guilty.

Prosecution undertakings were at the time influenced by more than justice pursuit. For this reason, the conviction and execution of Sacco and Vanzetti remains controversial to date. There are massive immigrant concerns that remain persistent in today’s society, just as they were during the Sacco and Vanzetti time. The interest here is to highlight immigrant concerns that have turned to be irrelevant or invalid in current times. The world society has evolved and revolutionized throughout the years.

During this time, there have been a series of changes that immigrant practices have experienced. In the Sacco and Vanzetti story, there is a persistent concern of injustices against immigrants. Sacco and Vanzetti trial, conviction, and execution were marred by prejudice against their background and country of origin. As earlier mentioned, Sacco and Vanzetti had emigrated from Italy to the United States (Carnevale 213). In the light of the crime they were charged with, the fact that they were immigrants had to count in their trial.

In other words, their innocence or guilt was informed by their race. The jury that tried them felt compelled and pressured by the Red Scare, and went ahead to convict them without substantial evidence that they had actually committed the cited murders. Their involvement in revolutionary pursuits that were informed by anarchism further made their case even worse. Immigrants engage in numerous activities in the host country, some of which are legal and others illegal. According to immigration laws, immigrants are expected to adhere to the laws and regulations of the host country, failure to which they are prosecuted within the existing legal system in the host country (Carnevale 229).

Today, when immigrants engage in criminal activities, they are charged just like any other person in the country they reside, and in pursuit of justice. The practice that immigrant’s nationality influences evidence to committing or not committing a crime no longer holds to be valid today. It is an irrelevant practice that has faded away with time due to diversity, interaction, and interdependence of countries around the world. Immigration in the 1900s was associated with economic benefits to the host country.

In other words, inward migration of persons to new territories was informed an added advantage to the country that hosted the immigrants. This was actually the case in the United States relative to the Sacco and Vanzetti case. Immigrants that were thought to be of no economic benefits to the host countries were turned away. They were only accepted in the event that they would benefit the host country. Today, this aspect has changed. In most cases, it does not even count as the reason for accepting inward immigrants in