The CNE - Continuing Nurse Education - Research Paper Example

The CNE article uses reliable data by showing consultations with the IOM report of 2000 and the studies of James in 2013. For instance, by referring to studies such as that of James, it is clear that the research conducted is of high quality, reliable, and valid. The assumption is that the study involves the identification of preventable adverse events that are readily applicable in the hospital context. For example, some of the preventable adverse events encompass errors of omission, errors of context, errors of commission, errors of communication, and those of context.

The experimental design used in this article entails several measures concerning patient safety and culture. Besides, the experiment includes varied elements of the patient safety culture that undergo development. The design in this context gains confidence by using numerous tools to ascertain the safety of the patients. Some of the tools involved include safety attitude questionnaires, safety cultural surveys, and the safety cultural improvement tool. There is tailoring of the instruments to various individuals to gain a broader perspective of the issue in question. Contextually, the tools targeted the hospital staff, the patients, and the medical personnel. Thus, it is a good design for the analysis of the safety of patients in the health care setup.

Ulrich & Kear (2014) have managed to use accurate data and statistics from recognized studies and reports. For instance, the IOM report indicates the number of people injured and those who died due to preventable adverse events. Despite the accurate use of this data, the research fails to carry out a critical statistical analysis to ascertain and give feedback to the individuals who participated in the surveys and questionnaires.

In summary, the article provides an account of what safety has entailed in the US after patient safety took center stage in the health care system. It reflects on the IOM report that captured the headlines of the nation concerning the safety of the patients. Through this reflection, the article offers a deeper insight into what has been happening in the patient safety and safety culture. It also captures the history of the movement of patient safety and describes the conceptions of patient culture and patient safety as fundamentals of health care service delivery.

In this context, there is an ease of access to the evidence gathered by Ulrich& Kear. The study identifies the sources from which it obtains the evidence and relates it to the current status of patient safety and culture. The evidence used in the article gives a clear indication of what the state was some years back as compared to the apparent situation of patient safety.

The features of quality measurement are diverse encompassing the importance of the measurement that entails its relevance to the stakeholders, the potential for improvement, and the health importance. Additionally, it involves the applicability in measuring the aspect of the equitable distribution of health care services. The second dimension is that the measure should be of scientific soundness that is, it should have measurable properties. In this case, the assurance should be reliable, valid, comprehensive, and exhibit allowances for patients. Moreover, the measure needs to be feasible having enough data and explicit specifications of the denominator and the numerator. Finally, it must contain scientific soundness from the clinical logic perspective, this incorporates the strength of the evidence and its explicitness (AHRQ, 2015).

Several questions arise regarding this article, They include the reasons for the Quality Assurance (QA) measurement and the benefits of QA. Further, the people who have the mandate to carry out the QA and when is it necessary. Read More