Nursing: Evidence-Based Practice - Assignment Example

Nursing: Evidence based Practice McMillan, S. C. & Small, B. J. (2007). Using the COPE intervention for family caregivers to improve symptoms of hospice homecare patients. Oncology Nursing Forum, 34(2), 313-21. 1) What is the purpose of this research? The purpose of this research that McMillan and Small (2007) aim at achieving was testing an intervention for hospice caregivers designed to help them better manage symptoms experienced by patients with cancer. This was done through creativity optimism, planning, and expert information also called the COPE. 2) What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit. From the main objective of the study, McMillan and Small (2007) wanted to answer a research question stating that: What is the effectiveness of COPE intervention for family caregivers in improving symptoms of hospice homecare patients? 3) What theories, frameworks, models or concepts may have influenced the researchers’ choice of a research design? Various models, concepts, and theories were employed in obtaining a better research design. Such models included stress process model where the stressors of caregivers are mainly patient’s signs, symptoms, and the distress symptoms. Stress process model is an effective way of obtaining answers regarding the main objective of the study. In addition, through literature review McMillan and Small (2007) obtained various information and concepts regarding creation or development of a better research design. 4) How do the authors describe the design of this study? McMillan and Small (2007) describe the research design as a three-group comparative design with repeated measures in a bid to attaining their objective whilst answering the main research question. In their bid to obtaining sufficient data, McMillan and Small (2007) confirm that their research design is a clinical trial. Participants were drawn from a large non hospice in which the researchers claimed that patients received proper home care. 5) Determine the classification of this study; is it McMillan and Small (2007) used an experimental study to obtain sufficient data to find answers to the research question. Experimental study engages different researchers in obtaining sufficient data to make proper conclusions on the subject of discussion. 6) What is the evidence that this journal is peer-reviewed? Does the journal have an editorial board? (Look for the journal’s website to discover this information) The evidence showing that this journal is a peer-reviewed article is the indication that after about 6 to 8 weeks editorial committee of the journal engages in serious review of the articles produced. The journal of Oncology of Nursing has an editorial committee headed by Susan Moore. This editorial committee ensures that there is a production of the articles or journal twice every month. 7) Is there evidence of any conflict of interest that might introduce bias into the way the study is designed, or the way the results are viewed? Do the authors have any potential financial gain from the results of this study? From the article, there is no evidence of conflict of interest between the authors. This is because each author of the article is determined to obtaining the research objectives and answering the research questions. Therefore, there will be little room for the tow authors to have a conflict of interest. The authors have possibility of obtaining financial gain from sale of the journals containing their articles. Rosedale, M., & Fu, M. R. (2010). Confronting the unexpected: Temporal, situational, and attributive dimensions of distressing symptom experience for breast cancer survivors. Oncology Nursing Forum, 37(1), 28-33. 8) What is the purpose of this research? The purpose of this research was to describe women’s unexpected and distressing symptom of sign that is usually experienced after treating them of breast cancer that is, for the patients suffering from breast cancer (Rosedale & Fu, 2010). 9) What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit. The main research question that Rosedale and Fu (2010) attempted to answer in their study in order to achieve the main objective was: What are the breast cancer survivors’ experiences of unexpected and distressing symptoms in the years following breast cancer treatment?” 10) What theories, frameworks, models or concepts may have influenced the researchers’ choice of a research design? Theories and concepts obtained from literature review influenced the researcher’s choice of the research design. For instance, applications of comparative method as well as phenomenology method used by earlier researchers influenced Rosedale and Fu (2010) in conducting their study in order to answer the main question whilst achieving their main objectives. Many other theories and concepts were drawn from World Health Organization and National Cancer Institute. These concepts influenced researcher’s choice of research design. 11) How do the authors describe the design of this study? Rosedale and Fu (2010) described their design as qualitative and descriptive research. Their qualitative and descriptive research designed involved secondary analysis of phenomenological data with constant comparative method. 12) Determine the classification of this secondary study; is it The classification of this study is qualitative and descriptive since the researchers obtained qualitative data on which they gave extensive description in respect to the research question and objective. Therefore, it was purely qualitative though descriptive. 13) What is the evidence that this journal is peer-reviewed? Does the journal have an editorial board? (Look for the journal’s website to discover this information) The Journal or article of Oncology of Nursing is a peer-reviewed article. The article is developed and reviewed after a period of between 6 and 8 weeks. In any case, the article is developed and reviewed by an editorial group led by Susan Moore. Oncology of Nursing Journal is produced bimonthly that is in January, March, May, July, September, and November. 14) Is there evidence of any conflict of interest that might introduce bias into the way the study is designed, or the way the results are viewed? Do the authors have any potential financial gain from the results of this study? There is no evidence of any conflict of interest that might introduce bias into the way of the study design as well as how the results are reviewed. This is because both researchers have a common interest and the study design is developed following information obtained from various concepts, theories, and models through proper literature review. Despite the fact that the authors may not have direct gains, the information or results they have provided is fulfilling enough to make the satisfied and fulfilled. On the other hand, the authors through the editorial board would get financial gain from the sales of the journals containing the article developed by the authors in concern. References McMillan, S. C. & Small, B. J. (2007). Using the COPE intervention for family caregivers to improve symptoms of hospice homecare patients. Oncology Nursing Forum, 34(2), 313-21. Rosedale, M., & Fu, M. R. (2010). Confronting the unexpected: Temporal, situational, and attributive dimensions of distressing symptom experience for breast cancer survivors. Oncology Nursing Forum, 37(1), 28-33. Read More