Judgment at Nuremberg - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
1. Judgment at Nuremberg is a powerful persuasive film by producer-director, Stanley Kramer, with Spencer Tracy playing the main protagonist of chief American judge, Dan Haywood. When four Nazi German Judges are put on trial for abetting holocaust during the Second World War, Haywood was at the helm to deliver the verdict…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.9% of users find it useful
Judgment at Nuremberg
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Judgment at Nuremberg"

Judgment at Nuremberg is a powerful persuasive film by producer-director, Stanley Kramer, with Spencer Tracy playing the main protagonist of chief American judge, Dan Haywood. When four Nazi German Judges are put on trial for abetting holocaust during the Second World War, Haywood was at the helm to deliver the verdict. Although, the actions of the German judges were a clear case of violation of human rights, Haywood played by Spencer Tracy faces slight ethical and moral dilemmas due to the background of one of the judges and also due to the changed political climate. Among the judges, Ernst Janning (portrayed by Burt Lancaster), was slightly different from others because he was an accomplished legal scholar, who drafted the strong Weimar constitution, and even expressed his opposition to Hitler. Due to this positive background, Tracy’s character has some dilemmas regarding Janning’s role in Holocaust. However, removing those mental dilemmas, and with only a minor conflict between what he feels “is lawful" and "is ethical", he convicts all the judges including Janning. Against Janning, he had strong evidences overriding any dilemmas. That is, despite his favorable credentials, in the Feldenstein case, Janning convicted Feldenstein although he is perceived as an innocent and importantly ordered imprisonment of many innocent Jews concentration camps and thereby facilitated their deaths in. 2. It is clear that although Janning had a creditable background, he has committed or facilitated crimes against the humanity, and thus has to be punished. This is line with the ethical principle of distributive justice as this principle mainly focuses on what is good and ethical to the whole society, instead of catering to individual interests. The argument put in favor of Janning was that, should he be accountable for the deaths in the concentration camp, although he just signed an order for imprisonment. However, in line with principle of distributive justice, that action of Janning proved to be detrimental to sizable number of people or society, and that negative effect on society has to be taken into account. 3. In the context of then prevailing political and social climate, as well as historical events, the resolution in the movie seems to be apt and ethically correct. That is, at the time of the trial, political repercussions of Second World War got subsided and Cold War has started. So, there was a view, that the German judges should not be punished strongly to avoid alienation of the German people, and to make the German government side with the United States. Quite contrary to that perception, the Germans themselves wanted to punish the Nazi criminals to wash off the taint of Holocaust and thereby salvage some pride. So, instead of taking a softer path, the resolution of sentencing the judges to life imprisonment was ethically apt. 4. Although, the Nuremberg Judgment had clear political and social impacts, it made impacts on the Healthcare arena as well. The Nuremberg Trials took place from 1945 to 1947, and it was in 1947, the World Medical Association (WMA) was established. When the WMA was set up, its founders decided to incorporate ethics for physicians taking into consideration the inhumane and unethical practices carried out by the German physicians at that time. “Conscious of the violations of medical ethics before and during World War Two, the founders of the WMA immediately took steps to ensure that physicians would at least be aware of their ethical obligations.” (Elnimeiri, 2008). Many obligations were included like, voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential during treatment and medical experiments, those experiments should yield fruitful results for the good of society, importantly the experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury, experiments should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons taking into ethical considerations, etc. (Elnimeiri, 2008). 5. The personal conclusions that can be made from the movie is that whatever be the external political, social and historical situations and pressures, ethical aspects has to be given prominence. In the film, there were pressures to go soft on the German judges and also consider Janning’s credentials, but Haywood played by Tracy placed strong emphasis on ethics and laws, thereby taking apt decision. He even declares that a judge responsibility is to stand for and uphold justice, overriding any personal and external pressures. In addition, the decision of Haywood not to focus on Janning’s ‘other side’, and decide mainly based on the repercussions of his decisions, were commendable and an ethically correct behavior. Reference: Elnimeiri, M. K. M. (2008). Nuremberg Code: A landmark document on medical research ethics. Sudanese Journal of Public Health, 3 (2): 94-96. Retrieved from: Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Judgment at Nuremberg Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Judgment at Nuremberg Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Judgment at Nuremberg Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Judgment at Nuremberg

Judgment at Nurember

...The Judgment at Nuremberg Introduction The film d Judgment at Nuremberg is a 1961 drama movie that depicts the Holocaustand the post-World War 11 Trials was written by Abby Mann and directed by the famous Stanley Kramer. Richard Widmark, Spencer Tracy, Werner Klemperer, Burt Lancaster, Maximilian Schell, Marlene Dietrich, Judy Garland, William Shatner and Montgomery Clift starred in the movie (Bradley, pg 67). The preceding version had been shown on a television event of Playhouse 90 and Klemperer and Schell starred in the same roles in this version as well. It was amongst the first films to be made about the World War II Holocaust (Bradley, pg 76). The film depicts the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

The Nuremberg Main Trials

...The Nuremberg Trials Introduction It is now safe to assume, after more than sixty years of retrospection, that the International Military Tribunal (IMT) in the Nuremberg Trials was a historical episode of global magnitude. In numerous instances, IMT embodies a radical transformation in international law. And the term ‘Nuremberg’ has been associated with the greatest principles and hopes of the world, and with the foundation of all later humanitarian endeavours.1 In examining the most memorable historical episodes, Nuremberg breaks new ground for a form of international verdict—objective, but not unavoidably detached; fair and just, but not devoid of decent, honourable,...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

The Nuremberg Trials Sentencing

...The Nuremberg Trials Sentencing Crimes against humanity and crimes against peace were among the charges that many ofthe accused were facing in the International Military Tribunal. The International Military Tribunal, which was famously known as the Nuremberg Trial, focused on individuals that had committed different crimes against Jews in Germany, which saw the death of a large number of them. An estimated six million Jews died during the holocaust, and the international community had to react to the problem that arose from that situation. Many of the people being charged declared their innocence before the court, while others questioned the authority of the court (Goldensohn 117). All this was happening...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

The Judgment of leaders

...?The Judgment of leaders The contextual framework of judging leaders at the present has increasingly become complex attributed to the ascribed perspective of the follower to the underlying leadership. This has also been attributed to uncertainty, dynamic business and organizational environments characterized with multiple realities based on the follower’s priorities, values and requirements. It is notable that the core major constraints affecting the follower judgment on a leader are the globalization demands, competition, technological and far reaching socio cultural developments and the underlying complexities in the society (Weibler, 2011). Both the internal and external societal contexts also plays a...
10 Pages(2500 words)Assignment

Money judgment

...Order No: 205526 Topic Money Judgement Submitted by Submitted to 16 April 2008 Order ID: 205526 Topic: Money Judgement Dear Soames,Thank you for your letter. According to your letter I have come to know that you are concerned about making will & taking your son as your business partner. Well, now I would like to inform you about the benefits of making a will & result of not making the will. Perhaps you have noticed that will is considered as the deed of certainty of distribution of properties you have. According to your own wish by making a will you can specify who will get how much property after your death. However, windows are open for you to change or cancel the will before your death and any kind of condition you can apply... No: 205526...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment

Judgement At Nuremberg

... the way it is now. The film has the contemporary theme of malevolence and it has portrayed the same to great effect. The repugnance in human beings has certainly got the better of them and this is why the world is in a chaotic state for donkey's years, we must understand that inflicting pain upon the people is a vicious cycle which will sooner or later come back to haunt the people who indulge in the same. Works Cited Judgement At Nuremberg (2009). In All Movie (Accessed on 11 August 2009)... s 11 August 2009 Judgement At Nuremberg Judgement at Nuremberg was realised in the year 1961 and the movie expansively presents the post World War...
2 Pages(500 words)Movie Review

Judgment Heuristic and Biases

...Judgment heuristic and biases Decision making is a complex process (Morsanyi and Handley, 18) Judgmental heuristics are sometimes used to make this process simpler. Judgmental heuristics are principles or methods by which one makes assessment or judgment of probability simpler. These are "rules of thumb", educated guesses, intuitive judgments or simply common sense. Generally beliefs concerning the uncertain events are expressed by statements like "I think thator chances are etc. These are sometimes expressed in numerical form as odd or subjective probabilities. Heuristics are simple, efficient rules, fine-tuned by evolutionary processes or learned, which...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Nuremberg Trial

...Introduction The Nuremberg Trial is trial of four Nazi judges before American court which comprised of three judges. The Nazi judges were accused of being partner in crimes and murders by the Nazi forces, and were further accused of their failure to make fair and honourable judgments. The four Nazi judges were accused of corrupt practices, and were tried for their failure to abide by and apply the fundamentals of law. The movie is based upon major shortcoming as per which the German judges could not be trailed on American land by the American judges under the Constitution of America. The accusations against judges were based upon atrocities and murders of Germans inside Germany. The establishment of an...
2 Pages(500 words)Movie Review

The Athenian Judgment in Melos

...The Athenian Judgment in Melos The Melian dialogue is one of the most legendary understandings made between the Athenians and the Spartans in Greek history. This dialogue took place during the Peloponnesian War and it was the 16th year since the actual war had begun. According to the situation the Melians did not have any other choice than to die if they respect themselves or, on the other hand, to live slaving under the Athenians. Before this part of the war, there was a treaty, which had stopped them from fighting after ten long years into that business. It was the situation when they both became respectful to each other from the awe of strength. Melos was the state, which played a neutral role in the war because the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Biases and Judgment

...Judgment Issues 30 August Memorandum Supervisor August 30, Judgment Issues Decision-making is critical to the success of organizations, because it results to actions that directly and indirectly impact organizational output and behaviors. The process of decision-making has been the subject of numerous studies, because the right approach can lead to effective and efficient decisions. The “fully rational” model of decision making, however, is too ideal, since it overlooks the role of emotions in making decisions. Furthermore, it does not assure decision fairness, when emotions can impact the accuracy of ones assessments. I would like to describe two judgment issues that I had to address, particularly biases related to anchoring... and...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Judgment at Nuremberg for FREE!

Contact Us