Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

The death penalty should be administered for particularly heinous crimes - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Death penalty has been in place up to date and whenever it is mentioned in courtroom, it elicits varied views from people, many terming it as a deterrent while others claiming it is unfair and ungodly mode of punishment. Punishment by death penalty has been a contentious debate…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95% of users find it useful
The death penalty should be administered for particularly heinous crimes
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "The death penalty should be administered for particularly heinous crimes"

January 9th Death penalty has been in place up to and whenever it is mentioned in courtroom, itelicits varied views from people, many terming it as a deterrent while others claiming it is unfair and ungodly mode of punishment. Punishment by death penalty has been a contentious debate whereby many declare it unconstitutional, inhumane and ungodly; however, it is the best form of deterrent to heinous crimes to criminals.
Death penalty has not been used for many years because they are usually swift and one considered best deterrent. With the use of capital punishment, most people are afraid of death that is inflicted by the law; hence, what is most fearful is likely to deter most criminals into engaging in heinous crimes. According to Hess and Drowns in their book wrote that death penalty is a better deterrent to violent youths (330). Administering death penalty will be effective in deterring murderers who might otherwise not been deterred through any other means when they friend face this punishment. This is because most of these murderers when given life sentence in place of death penalty, they continue committing crimes in prison, such as murdering other prisoners or even prison wards; therefore, death sentence is the only punishment that can be used to prevent such criminals from committing crimes. Otherwise, they will not be discouraged into committing heinous crimes through any other means, and again because both convicted prisoners and prison warders deserve protection from these criminals.
In addition, it is important to enforce death penalty as a form of retribution even though death penalty does not prove to stop murderers from continuing the practice due to the threat of life imprisonment. On the contrary, the finality of death penalty creates fear amongst criminals and sparing the life of prospective victims by deterring those who murdered them, is of more importance than preserving the life of a convicted murderer because of the possibility that executing them will not necessarily deter other murderers. Therefore, in addition, to using death penalty to prevent crime, it is not imposed for the main purpose of reattributing crimes, for instance, in case of murder it is unjust for the criminal to live. Putting threats and punishment is a necessity in the deterrence since it a one justification for violent crimes. Therefore, a criminal who commits heinous crime volunteers to assume the risks involved; hence, the punishment suffered is voluntarily risked and it is unjust to the criminal not to be convicted and given a death penalty.
On the other hand, as Cole and Smith state death penalty lingers as barbaric especially from the less civilized age (274). Even though death penalty is considered one of the best solutions for deterring dangerous criminals from violent crimes other than life imprisonment. Moreover, Sather contends that execution removes killers from the society but at the same time, it brutalizes (256). Death penalty causes brutality to the society increasing the probability of likelihood murders. Most people involved in murder crimes do the crime without the expectation of being caught. On the contrary, heinous crimes such as murder are committed in the act of passion or even by drug users and they may have acted in an impulsive way. There is no sufficient evidence showing death penalty is an efficient way of deterring other crimes other than life imprisonment. Therefore a criminal in prison will settle into a routine and will become less a threat to commit violence hence the society will be safe without the assurance by death penalty.
In conclusion, regardless of the type and nature of a crime committed, it is the responsibility of the judiciary to punish a criminal through death penalty; it is justifiable in other circumstances to punish heinous criminals by death. This is to curb such vices, offer the most appropriate and justifiable retribution to crimes committed, and consequently ensure that these crimes reduce in our society.
Works Cited
Cole, George F. and Smith, Christopher, E. Criminal Justice in America. California, USA: Thompson Learning Inc. 2007.Print.
Hess Kalen M., and Drowns Robert, W. Juvenile Justice. Belmont, USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. 2009.Print.
Sather, Trevor. Pros and Cons: A Debater’s Handbook. London, UK: Routledge. 2012.Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“The death penalty should be administered for particularly heinous Research Paper”, n.d.)
The death penalty should be administered for particularly heinous Research Paper. Retrieved from
(The Death Penalty Should Be Administered for Particularly Heinous Research Paper)
The Death Penalty Should Be Administered for Particularly Heinous Research Paper.
“The Death Penalty Should Be Administered for Particularly Heinous Research Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The death penalty should be administered for particularly heinous crimes

Death Penalty

..., California physicians refused the demand by the government to use lethal injection as a means of execution hence execution was stopped. They claimed that there are many constructive ways in addressing violent crimes and those two wrongs do not make a right (Baumgartner, Boydstun and De Boef 78). However, the proponents of death penalty action feel that this is the only way to deter criminals from any further illegal actions. They argue that justice must be served in favour of the victims. Most fundamental legal provision is that punishment should always fit the crime. In addition, justice delayed is justice denied (Morris 70). Those against...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Death penalty

...?Death Penalty In a world characterized by all forms of crimes, law and justice are very important aspects in the society. There are different levelsof crimes. Some are civil while others are capital. Governments and religious organization dictate the course of justice to the offended and the punishment to the convicted in the society. There are various forms of justice and punishment applied by governments and religious groups. Different crimes require different punishments. Among such punishments is the death penalty. However, in also most all cases the power to prescribe a punishment rests with the courts of law that...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Death penalty impartially. Given their career investment in this system, judges have been known to entertain this belief (Gerber & Johnson, 2007). Some supporters of the death penalty also take a moralistic approach. To these kinds of people the main justification for the death penalty lies in giving every offender his “due.” In this philosophical position capital punishment finds its support in the notion of moral “desert”, where desert implies a punishment required to be proportionate in kind, severity, or amount of pain matching the original crime. Advocates of this view maintain that the most convincing justification for the death...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Death Penalty

...because it scares off other potential criminals. The opponent perspective terms death penalty as immoral, uncivilized and ineffective in curbing crime. The proponent perspective portends that some crimes are so affront to humanity such that they can only be punishable through death. This paper is an opinionated argument detailing why the death penalty should be retained and the reasons causing the controversy. Death penalty is applied for vicious crimes such as murder and treason. Some of the methods of execution include lethal injection, electrocution...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Death penalty

...number Why should the Death Penalty be abolished The Death penalty is one of the most controversial forms of punishment. Its roots in the context of corporal punishment has been criticized for its harshness and inhumanity; but it has also been lauded for its apparent effectiveness in deterring crime and brandishing corresponding punishment for severe and heinous crimes. On one side of the issue, the death penalty is based on the concept of an ‘eye for an eye,’ and that one should receive the corresponding punishment for one’s actions. On the other side...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Death Penalty in the US

... psychology (Bohm, 1992) and asserts that criminals must be punished for their crime and the severity of punishment must accord with the gravity of the crime committed. It means the payback or requital for the criminal’s action. “The death penalty has been and continues to be defended on the grounds in which society has the ethical responsibility to protect the welfare and security of its citizens from the heinous crimes which justify such a sentence” (Weatherby et al., 2012). Death penalty derives its significance from the fact that the criminal needs to be punished for the heinous crime that he/she has committed. Methods of Execution Death penalty in the US is offered in a whole range of ways that include but are not limited... ...
8 Pages(2000 words)Term Paper

Does Death Penalty Successfully Deter Crimes

...should be abolished in the following paragraphs. According to the article of Dawn Krider, guilty prisoners are sentenced to death to prevent similar crimes to happen again. However, according to the statistics given on her writing, in the twelve states that allow capital punishment, the murder rate is twice as of the rest of the states that do not allow executions. Is this an eye opener for people who are supporting death penalty? More so, it is also discussed in the same article that killing is wrong except when someone kills as a self-defense. Yet, can we justify killing a prisoner behind bars a self-defense? When your life is in immediate danger, you...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Death Penalty

...? Death Penalty Death Penalty Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, has, in the past, been exercised by many jurisdictions (Gaie, 2012). However, these days, only 58 nations actively exercise it and 97 nations have done away with it. The rest, nearly 50 states, have not utilized the law for a decade. They, however, permit it in exceptional situations for instance during wartimes. It is an issue of active controversy in numerous states and countries, and positions can differ in a single cultural region or political ideology. In the European Union (EU) member countries, the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Death penalty abolish capital punishment. Supporters of the death penalty argue that murder is a violation of the most fundamental of human rights: the right to life and this heinous crime merits the deathpenalty. Their contention is that justice, which is the basic tenet of the legal system, mandates that the punishment is appropriate to the seriousness of the crime. Here, the death penalty is the only punishment which is in proportion to the crime of depriving the victim of life. As murder violates the sanctity of life, justice is served only by the award of the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Death penalty for specifically identified egregious crimes

...Death penalty for specifically identified egregious crimes One of the issues that continue to assume a controversial stance is capital punishment. One’s personal perspectives are affected in terms of viewing the right of the state to impose death penalty for specifically identified egregious crimes. One is out rightly opposed to capital punishment; but apparently, some states in America continue to uphold capital punishment, which grossly disturb social conscience and is seen to be ethical, morally, and legally unjustified. In a recent featured editorial article in The New York Times, entitled “America’s Retreat From the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic The death penalty should be administered for particularly heinous crimes for FREE!

Contact Us