Law --Problem solving - Assignment Example

Hug’s daughters with the property. The case description suggests that Mr. Hug has actually cut down the trees situated near the so called central grand in order to generate funds for the education of his children besides case also discusses the overall nature of the relationship between the successors of Mr. Hug in terms of loss of Blackwood trees. The situation described in the case therefore asks for legally distinguishing the concept of fixtures and chattels while also requiring comments on the rights and obligations of the successors in terms of the loss of blackwood trees.

It also need to be noted that both these concepts deal with the personal property therefore the overall rights and obligations of the individuals shall also be dealt according to the rights and obligations given under the Property laws. The distinction here therefore is between the real and personal property and how to make a differentiation between the fixtures and chattels besides discussing the rights and obligations of the successors. Under the property laws, a fixture is any property which is actually fixed or attached with the real property.

Under the Common law, real property is therefore considered as an immovable property and is a subset of the land with a clear legal definition. The distinguishing characteristics therefore to identify the difference between the fixture as well as the chattel property therefore is as to whether the property is actually affixed or fixed with the real property or not and the basic difference between the two types of properties therefore is based upon this criteria. (Moore) It is also important to understand that the fixtures are often considered as the part of the property and when mortgages or any security interests are registered, they are often considered as the part of the real property.

However, the case of Chattels is different and for the purpose of law they are often not considered as the part of the real property and as