Defining plagiarism in the digital age - Annotated Bibliography Example

In the article “Unoriginal Sins: (Re)Defining plagiarism in the digital age.”, there is a mainstream thought that plagiarism issue makes procrastinate in their academic success. The author strives to make it clear through several studies done before. All data gathered serve to articulate students’ incapability of running their papers by themselves (Daniloff 1). Samples of what different students say in explanation of plagiarism issue give ground to think of the problem in a more global scope.

The author states it clearly by asking himself as follows: “In this age of file-sharing, mashups, Wikipedia, and music sampling, has the practice of borrowing without asking become more pervasive” (Daniloff 1)? In the course of time, plagiarism is said to change every now and then. Thus, the author brings it to a reader’s mind that plagiarism has been taken for granted, as students don’t think it is bad.In my opinion, the article fully supports my opinion that “plagiarism causes a lack of formation of intelligence.

” It is a hazardous phenomenon in the age of high technologies and Web 2:0, in particular. Hence, the message by the author urges to break down any idea of counter attitude toward plagiarism as something needful for students. Digital innovations through Internet prevent students from writing their papers alone, without any help of custom-writing services. This is why the article describes the core of the problem in detail. Thus, the formation of intelligence among students tends to get delayed, since Internet technologies grow quicker than ever before.

This is why a gap in growing wiser is inevitable for students full of digital experience worldwide. This trend seems never ending for academic sustainability of universities today. Hence, it is about time to keep a strict eye on this issue. Daniloff, Caleb. "Unoriginal Sins: (Re)Defining plagiarism in the digital age." 6 December 2010. BU Today. 28 May 2011 .