Supply Chain Sustainability - Literature review Example

SUРРLY СHАIN SUSTАINАBILITY RЕSЕАRСH RЕРОRT By (Student’s Name) Course Professor’s Name Institution Location Date of Submission Table of Content Supply chain Sustainability 21 1 SUРРLY СHАIN SUSTАINАBILITY RЕSЕАRСH RЕРОRT 1 Executive Summary 4 Introduction 5 Literature Review 6 Corporate social responsibility 6 CSR in global supply chains 7 Sustainable Manufacturing 13 Sustainable Marketing 14 Sustainable Transportation 14 Sustainable Purchasing 15 Environmental Management System 15 The Sequence of Developing Sustainable Supply Chain 16 Conclusion 17 Bibliography 19 Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Literature Review 5 Corporate social responsibility 5 CSR in global supply chains 6 Sustainable Manufacturing 12 Sustainable Marketing 12 Sustainable Transportation 13 Sustainable Purchasing 13 Environmental Management System 13 The Sequence of Developing Sustainable Supply Chain 14 Conclusion 15 Bibliography 17 Executive Summary Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is progressively turning into a famous business idea in global economies. As usual in different business ideas, it is headed to globalization through practices and structures of the globalized entrepreneur world request, exemplified in Multinational Corporations. Notwithstanding, CSR regularly sits uncomfortably in this entrepreneur world, as MNCs are frequently tested by the worldwide range of their supply chains and the conceivable flighty practices inherent along these chains. The likelihood of reckless practices puts worldwide firms under pressure to secure their brands regardless of the fact that it means expecting obligations regarding the acts of their suppliers. This paper tries to review the regularly underestimated supposition that organizations ought to be responsible for the acts of their suppliers by upholding the ethical (and at times lawful) underpinnings of the idea of responsibility. But where corporate control as well as corporate gathering exists, it recognizes the utilization of force as a discriminating element to be considered in allotting responsibility in firm-supplier relationship; and proposes that the most capable in this relationship has a responsibility to apply some ethical impact on the weaker party. The paper highlights the utilization of code of behaviours, corporate society, staff training and worth reorientation as would be prudent wellsprings of wielding positive good impact along supply chains. Introduction During the past century, the global population has tripled, and the global economy has advanced by over 20 times with an expanded fossil fuel utilization as well as industrial development (Ni, Li & Tang, 2010).This huge monetary improvement together with uncontrolled urbanization (PRB, 2010) have brought about the quick utilization and expanding contamination of the natural environment. The immeasurable ecological damage, which has weakened the nature of human life and came to undermining levels in different structures, for example, the unnatural weather change, depletion of the ozone layer, fermentation and loss of biodiversity, has called forward the sustainability rule and transformed natural perspectives into noteworthy criteria in business decision making (Pedersen & Andersen, 2006). Subsequently, the importance of sustainability in regards to changes in business practices has been the centre of research in the past few decades (Young, 2015). Wieland & Handfield (2013) define sustainable development as "an advancement that addresses the issues of the present without compromising the capacity of future eras to address their own issues". Obtaining and enhancing sustainability in supply chain has turned into the key issue in supply chain management. Sustainable supply chain management has increased more enthusiasm by the organizations and the researchers (Tencati, Russo & Quaglia, 2008). The most essential procedure included is evaluating the sustainability. When it comes to evaluation, the key issue is considering framework limits, that is dissecting the single hierarchical operations or the whole supply chain process, or considering the direct effect from inside environment or the direct effect from outside environment, for example, suppliers (Rotter, Airike, & Mark-Herbert, 2014) alternate objectives which characterize sustainable supply chain are acquiring, logistics, social, monetary and ecological components. SSCM coordinate different methods incorporates green environment or green supply chain process, social issues, for example, respectable working conditions, and verifying that all materials are supplied in moral way all through the supply chain (Merminod & Pache, 2011) Each and every association have their own variables which impact sustainability, a few organizations concentrate on green issues and some more concentrates on social perspectives. So keeping in mind the end goal to get a reasonable perspective of the research, a complete literature review on corporate social responsibility and sustainable supply chain procedure is carried out and clarified below. Literature Review Corporate social responsibility Corporate social responsibility is a more extensive idea and not restricted to supply chains; however, to the organizations' general treatment of individuals and the surroundings. Furthermore, the main discussion point in this paper is on CSR in worldwide supply chains. In spite of the fact that CSR is an entrenched idea, there is no general agreement on the significance of CSR practically (Lund-Thomsen & Lindgreen, 2014). As indicated by Hill et al. (2003), a careful meaning of CSR is slippery in light of the fact that convictions and disposition about the nature of the relationship in the middle of businesses and societies vary with the significant issues of the day. Besides, Mette & Tage (2009) contend that the troubles with landing at a meaning of CSR halfway affect the issue of deciding operationally the administrative ramifications of such a definition. This is a noteworthy issue considering organizations' disparities in size, items, benefit, assets, societal effects, and so forth. An alternate component adding to the perplexity about the nature of CSR is the substantial number of ideas used to portray to a great extent the same concept. Scholars, experts and corporate administrators have given different definitions to business' engagement in moral issues. Among the ideas that have been utilized – separated from CSR – are sustainable improvement, corporate citizenship, sustainable business enterprise, the triple primary concern, and business morals (Lawrence, 2007). Comprehensively, the concept of CSR as is well-known today has two principle attributes. Firstly, it depicts the relationship in the middle of businesses and the bigger society. Also, it alludes to an organization's intentional exercises in the zone of natural and social issues (Andersen & Skjoett-Larsen, 2009). CSR in global supply chains As the characteristic of numerous business relations is changing from organizations selling their products inside entirely owned offices in national operations to organizations taking part in supply chains and supplier-based distribution across the nations, the idea of CSR is similarly changing. CSR is no more the individual organization's duty; progressively, it envelops the whole supply chain. At the end of the day, multinational organizations are not just anticipated that would carry on socially in their own particular juridical dividers. They are likewise considered in charge of ecological and work practices of their worldwide exchanging partners, for example, suppliers, outsider logistics suppliers, and mediators over which they have no possession (Andrew et al., 2008). The need for CSR in worldwide supply chains ought to especially be seen in light of the way a vast number of worldwide exchanges are led through frameworks of administration, which connect firms together in different sourcing and contracting plans (Anner, 2012). The expression "administration" suggests that some key performers in the supply chain, regularly extensive multinational organizations,–take responsibility for the between firm division of work and particular members' abilities to overhaul their exercises (Amaeshi, Osuji & Nnodim, 2008). Accordingly, they find themselves able to control manufacturing over expansive distances without owning offices (Cheong & Gaunt, 2008). Boyd et al. (2007) contends that these key performing artists are regularly placed in developed nations and incorporate multinational producers, as well as substantial retailers and brand-name firms. The authority held by these organizations comes from their business sector power and control over key assets required in the supply chains of which they are part. Given their energy, these performers assume a critical part in indicating what ought to be created, how and by whom (Boyd et al., 2007). The companies may additionally give specialized backing to their suppliers to empower them to attain to the obliged execution. Cruz (2013) contends that "the development of 'worldwide quality chains', through which Northern purchasers control a web of suppliers in the South, has prompted demand for them to assume liability not just for perspectives, for example, quality and conveyance dates, additionally for working conditions and ecological effects". The weight applied on multinational organizations originates from both inner and outside partners, for example, clients, representatives, unions, shareholders, business accomplices, governments, NGOs and the media, who demonstrate an expanding sympathy toward the ecological and social conditions at seaward generation areas, especially in developing nations (Dobers & Halme, 2009). This worry is generally an after-effect of a heightening of sight and sound communication technology, which makes it more troublesome for organizations to shroud deceptive practices at their suppliers. The raising stream of data across the national and social outskirts has offered an increase to stories about multinational organizations' unreliable practices, for example, infringement of union rights, utilization of child labour, perilous working conditions, race and sexual segregation, and so forth. Extraordinary illustrations from the media are IKEA, Gap, Wal-Mart, and Starbucks (Gugler & Shi, 2009). At this point, numerous multinational organizations have reacted to the weight and desires by partners by characterizing, creating and executing frameworks and strategies to guarantee that their suppliers consent to social and natural guidelines. Despite the fact that organizations pick their own particular way to systematizing the CSR endeavours in supply chains, numerous studies uncover that the most obvious component in the methodology of huge multinational organizations is the occupation of corporate implicit rules. The quantity of sets of accepted rules has become marvellously large since the mid 1990s (Jin, Zuo & Feng, 2014). So, an implicit rule is a report expressing various social and ecological guidelines and standards that an association's suppliers are relied upon to satisfy (Young, 2015). Implicit rules are progressively presented in contracts between a purchaser organization and its suppliers (Wieland & Handfield, 2013). They are regularly taking into account the qualities with which the individual firm wishes to be related, and its standards are frequently gotten from neighbourhood enactment and worldwide traditions, benchmarks, and standards, for example, UN's Global Compact, ISO 14001, and the ILO Declaration on primary values and rights at workplaces. In numerous expansive multinational organizations, the codes are joined by intricate administrative frameworks for figuring, authorizing and overhauling the guidelines sketched out in the codes. Notwithstanding, experimental confirmation has demonstrated that numerous multinational partnerships have battled with the issue of how to execute their sets of accepted rules in their worldwide supply chains (Gugler & Shi, 2009). Perceiving this, the ILO has performed a top to bottom investigation of the administration frameworks and procedures used to actualize sets of principles in the games footwear, clothing and retail areas (Lawrence, 2007). Albeit corporate sets of principles are currently broadly utilized by multinational organizations, not all spectators have an uplifting state of mind towards the codes. Cruz (2013) in this manner contends that "sets of accepted rules are dreadfully dangerous". This argument is in view of the contention that codes cannot be authorized in the same route as legitimate prerequisites, nor are they drafted because of the needs of the workers of the organizations they are coordinated towards. Anner (2012) additionally reprimands the sets of principles for regularly being displayed as open explanations of grand purpose and reason without a particular substance. Then again, Cheong & Gaunt (2008) contends that sets of accepted rules in worldwide supply chains are not by any stretch of the imagination wilful; however, can be considered as a valuable supplement to national work and job laws. Implicit rules are frequently received to keep weight from distinctive partner gatherings, including the expanding impact of socially dependable speculation. A few observational studies have been made to explore how firms work with CSR-related issues in their supply chains (Cheong & Gaunt, 2008). The majority of these studies are bound to substantial multinational enterprises, as well as SMEs. Gugler and Shi (2009) have analyzed the drivers, obstructions and impacts of socially mindful obtaining of US organizations, and methods for defeating these hindrances. The ILO has directed an examination of implicit rules usage, which basically centred on giving a comprehension of the different administration frameworks actualized by multinational partnerships and their suppliers to build, impart and assess progress towards achieving the goals of their sets of principles (Lawrence, 2007). Anner (2012) has analyzed the composed CSR arrangements of organizations in 15 nations America, Europe, and Asia. In spite of numerous organizations' endeavours to participate in CSR-related exercises in their supply chains, there is regularly a gap between the moral measures communicated and the real conditions at the suppliers. As such, it can be argued that so far just a set number of multinational companies "walk the discussion" of CSR in their worldwide supply chains (Mette & Tage, 2009). On thinking back to more established productions and explorations, numerous number of inquiries on sustainability of supply chain began in the mid of 1990's. Recently, there is constantly a growing concern on supply chain sustainability, and more excited about how associations relate with their supply chain sustainability. SSCM have its goals from various perspectives as social, financial, ecological, moral, and savvy. Every analyst thought of some objectives as a primary centre of their exploration and draws out their examination thought. (Dobers & Halme, 2009) The information on SSCM is constantly a kaleidoscope observation, it has an extensive variety of subjects, and it relies upon the analyst whose viewpoint of the exploration assumes a major part. The degree of examination differs from green supply, green buying, moral obtaining, reusing, security methods, and approved suppliers, less carbon discharge and converse logistics. Till today, numerous scrutinizes focus on individual parts of sustainability, on the grounds that supply chain sustainability depends an extensive variety of exercises. (Anner, 2012) In the supply chain setting, the meaning of sustainability additionally changes. As per Cruz (2013), ecological cognizant supply chain administration has generally accentuated on item recuperation (reusing, remanufacturing, or reuse) or the item plan capacity (for example outline for environment). Cruz (2013) contends that natural contemplations in assembling are regularly divided from conventional worth included contemplations. Consequently, moral decision making in supply chain is proposed. Mette and Tage (2013) contemplated the suggestions, for supply chain administration, of the utilization of reused materials in assembling. Andrew et al. (2008) argues that sustainable operations consolidate the benefit and productivity centre of conventional operations with the organization's partner issues, and its ecological effects. The idea even grows to incorporate green item and process advancement; green supply chains and innovation, lean and green suppliers, green SCM and execution, and in addition remanufacturing and close-circle supply chains (Rotter, Airike, & Mark-Herbert, 2014). In the sustainable supply chain writings, there is an extensive variety of definitions since scientists and specialists lay accentuation on one or more stages and exercises that constitute the life cycle of a product. The meaning of Rotter, Airike, & Mark-Herbert (2014) incorporates gainfulness, asset viability while Andrew et al. (2008) characterizes sustainable supply chains utilizing the idea of closed circle supply chains and triple primary concern factors. The meaning of Tencati, Russo & Quaglia (2008) further include straightforward combination of a business’ social, ecological and monetary objectives. Merminod & Pache (2011) contends that "sustainability should likewise coordinate issues and streams that augment past the centre of supply chain administration ". These definitions are corresponding and can serve as a premise for deciding a system for evaluating corporate sustainability, particularly its connection with supply chain administration. A considerable measure of examination has been carried out on sustainable supply chain administration, yet frequently from a one-dimensional point of view, taking a gander at only one business area or one of the three mainstays of sustainability: social, financial and ecological. Wieland & Handfield (2013) contend that a suitable development and innovation administration is vital for sustainable manufacturing methods. For retail commercial enterprises, Cruz (2013) looked at supply chains in the espresso business utilizing pointers, for example, reasonable value, expense of manufacturing and capacity to address essential issues. Amaeshi, Osuji and Nnodim (2008) argue about the veering elucidations of nourishment sustainability. Different writers have examined the utilization of sustainable supply chain administration to assembling and hardware based businesses (Pedersen & Andersen, 2006). This literature review demonstrates that there are numerous studies on green supply chain administration and social issues on supply chains, fundamentally work standard, yet there are very few works directed on more exhaustive diagram of sustainability parts of supply chain administration including each of the three mainstays of social, monetary and ecological angles. The social viewpoints and in addition the mix of the three measurements of sustainability are seldom specified (Rotter, Airike, & Mark-Herbert, 2014). Sustainable Manufacturing Manufacturing is the second action that is essential in creating SSCM. Ecological generation can be accomplished by utilizing clean manufacturing system, new innovation, and diminishing crude materials and assets to achieve low enter, high yield and low contamination (Lund-Thomsen & Lindgreen, 2014). Lean assembling or the Just-in-time system is the first generation method that attained to ecological objectives or named as natural manufacturing. Gugler and Shi (2009) affirm that "incline assembling is an imperative thought in decreasing the ecological effect of the generation stage". Dobers & Halme (2009) accept that incline manufacturing is useful in enhancing natural execution of producers through exercises, for example, waste decrease and minimizing dangerous wastes. Lawrence (2007) attests that "incline generation prompts enhancements in natural execution and it helps associations in diminishing the negligible expense of contamination. Amaeshi, Osuji & Nnodim (2008) distinguish that incline plants plan to minimize waste items and cushions in ecological innovation and administration. Reusing is an alternate generation movement that aides in creating SSCM. Boyd et al. (2007) affirm that reusing helps associations to enhance the ecological picture before their clients. Sustainable items lead to accomplish sustainable in reusing for the items and a few sections. An alternate action of embedding sustainable manufacturing is converse logistics, which is tolerating items for remanufacturing and reusing purposes. Financial components, for example, lessen manufacturing costs additionally helped associations to embrace reverse logistics. Sustainable Marketing Advertising is an imperative movement in creating and executing SSCM. To attain to sustainable advertising, associations "ought to keep organic adjust, and give careful consideration to ecological security" (Cheong & Gaunt, 2008). Cruz (2013) accepts that administration of squanders in sustainable promoting can prompt expense reserve funds and upgraded aggressiveness. What's more, it helps associations improve their relationship with clients, suppliers, and different accomplices. Sustainable Transportation This is an alternate imperative component in creating successful SSCM. Numerous elements including fuel sources, sort of transport, base, and operational and administration practices ought to be considered in growing naturally amicable transportation frameworks. Dobers & Halme (2009) accept that these elements and the motion that join them, "focus the natural effect created in the transportation logistics period of the supply chain." Sustainable Purchasing Creating SSCM obliges actualizing sustainable buying techniques. Cheong & Gaunt (2009) affirm that sustainable obtaining prompts decreasing waste and unsafe materials by utilizing natural crude materials. Additionally, sustainable obtaining assumes a noteworthy part in SSCM in light of the fact that it supports associations in diminishing the wellspring of contamination and waste by utilizing methodologies, for example, reusing, and scrapping, dumping, or sorting and utilizing biodegradable bundling. Environmental Management System Innovation has rearranged the many-sided quality of natural environmental issues and aided in settling on ecological choices. One new innovation that aided in settling on natural choices in SSCM is EMS, which is a data framework that can be utilized for enhancing ecological and business execution. EMS influences every action in sustainable supply chain management and businesses can utilize EMS to lessen natural damages with less exertion and brief time. Pedersen & Andersen (2006) abridge the EMSs preferences by overseeing natural danger, helping businesses in accomplishing their ecological objectives, responsibility to natural change, enhancing business execution, and enhanced group relations. EMS will prompt compelling usage for SSCM in light of the fact that the straightforwardness in imparting data to distinctive gatherings including representatives, suppliers, merchants, clients, and government organizations. Likewise, it helps in making reports that aide in the appraisal and checking procedures. Distinctive innovative developments, for example, database systems helped EMS to be more successful in overseeing SSCM exercises. The latest innovation that has been utilized as a part of SSCM is Radio Frequency Identification (RFID). RFID helped in "enhancing the natural wellbeing of the world and the monetary soundness of the retail businesses and their suppliers… diminishing superfluous truck conveyances … and lessening clients' excursions to stores for things that were out of stock amid their starting visit" (Lawrence, 2007). More propelled remote innovations, propelled choice Support Systems and Artificial Inelegant will be more viable later on of SSCM. The Sequence of Developing Sustainable Supply Chain Exploring past studies helped in understanding the phases of creating SSCM in the course of recent years. The beginning stage for SSCM is lean assembling that has helped in cutting expenses and enhancing the creation quality. At that point, individual natural responsibility with driving from government regulations is the second phase of the SSCM actuates. Sustainable plan and utilizing suitable material for bundling are the third phase of creating SSCM. At that point, reusing, remanufacturing and converse logistics have been created in 1999. After that, more composed regulations and worldwide exercises helped in enhancing the clients' mindfulness. Clients' mindfulness put weight on associations to receive sustainable procedures and it moved the SSCM to the following stages. This weight constrained associations create SSCM methods to satisfy the customer enthusiasm for the sustainability. Companies spent more endeavours to meet their purchaser's details. At that point, companies have created surveying and observing methodology to accomplish more powerful SSCM. Furthermore, mindfulness classes and instruction programs for workers, suppliers, merchants, and clients were given to enhance the mindfulness level. Enhancing quality is still vital issue in creating SSCM (Young, 2015). The quick technological advancements have assumed a huge part in enhancing the nature of executing SSCM. At present, RFID is the latest methodology that has been utilized to execute compelling SSCM in every last bit of its exercises. The accompanying diagram compresses the grouping of creating SSCM in the course of recent years. Conclusion As of late, numerous multinational enterprises have expanded their outsourcing of assembling exercises to developing nations. Parallel with this advancement, supply chain administration has moved from an operational viewpoint, concerned basically with buying costs, quality issues, and sourcing dependability, to a vital point of view with an attention on long term relations with key suppliers. In this paper, the developing enthusiasm for overseeing CSR in supply chains proactively has been discussed. Particularly, the paper has explored how CSR is implanted in a multinational enterprise's worldwide supply chains. The basis behind this methodology is that multinational organizations are not just in charge of sound ecological and social practices inside their own premises, but is in charge of the natural and social execution at their suppliers, and at last for the whole supply chain. Since only a few articles in the literature review have researched how CSR issues are executed and controlled along a supply chain, results are helpful for academicians. Since the paper talks about an arrangement of CSR issues to be considered in SCM and portrays the practices reported by the organizations, it can be utilized as a benchmark when supervisors choose to begin executing CSR in their supply chain or need to enhance the momentum CSR execution of their supply chain. Future exploration will further examine how a percentage of the organizations manage CSR in SCM by receiving a contextual investigation approach. Different gatherings of partners (for example clients, non-legislative associations, open establishments) are pushing on organizations to embrace CSR administration devices (such as implicit rules) additionally to screen if and how suppliers conform to CSR benchmarks and standards. Notwithstanding the significance of such issues, few articles have examined how CSR issues are executed and controlled along a supply chain. In this case, CSR reports are intentionally composed by organizations to portray their social, natural and monetary execution. These reports are for the most part used to formalize an organization's position on CSR. For this reason, the supply chain strategy formalizes the organizations' working practices. It likewise reports in an organized manner how organizations function in conjunction with its suppliers. The key responsibility is the minimization of the social and natural effects when securing merchandise and services; and the nature of the ecological and social issues connected with the primary items and services secured. As reported in the approach, organizations ideally utilize suppliers nearby to their operations, pay suppliers inside the contractual terms of settlement, and recognize and get sustainable option suppliers when fitting. The moral exchanging approach explains organizations' position on issues that are concerned with human rights and environmental protection in the supply chain. Organizations like to encourage healthy relationships, need to guarantee that all supply chain partners, paying little heed to where they live or work, are approached with respect and dignity, and have the capacity to live in a situation undamaged as a consequence of manufacturing. Bibliography Andersen, M., & Skjoett-Larsen, T. (March 13, 2009). Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. Supply Chain Management: an International Journal, 14, 2, 75-86. Andrew, C., In Dirk, M., In Abagail, M. W., In Jeremy, M., In Donald, S. S., Andrew, C., Abagail, M. W., ... Donald, S. S. (February 14, 2008). The Corporate Social Responsibility Agenda. Anner, M. (December 01, 2012). Corporate social responsibility and freedom of association rights: The precarious quest for legitimacy and control in global supply chains. Politics and Society, 40, 4, 609-644. Amaeshi, K. M., Osuji, O. K., & Nnodim, P. (January 01, 2008). Corporate Social Responsibility in Supply Chains of Global Brands: A Boundaryless Responsibility? Clarifications, Exceptions and Implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 1, 223-234. Boyd, D. E., Spekman, R. E., Kamauff, J. W., & Werhane, P. (June 01, 2007). Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Supply Chains: A Procedural Justice Perspective. Long Range Planning, 40, 3, 341-356. Cheong, L., & Gaunt, J. (September 01, 2008). Quality in corporate social responsibility : case study : quality. Management Today, 24, 8, 32-33. Cruz, J. M. (July 01, 2013). Mitigating global supply chain risks through corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Production Research, 51, 13, 3995-4010. Cruz, J. M. (October 01, 2013). Modeling the relationship of globalized supply chains and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 73-85. Dobers, P., & Halme, M. (September 01, 2009). Corporate social responsibility and developing countries. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16, 5, 237-249. Gugler, P., & Shi, J. Y. J. (April 01, 2009). Corporate Social Responsibility for Developing Country Multinational Corporations: Lost War in Pertaining Global Competitiveness?. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 1, 3-24. Herrman, K. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development: the European Union Initiative as a Case Study. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 11, 2. 1-29. Jin, X.-H., Zuo, J., & Feng, Y. (January 01, 2014). Corporate Social Responsibility on Global Construction Supply Chains. Lawrence, R. (June 01, 2007). Corporate Social Responsibility, Supply-chains and Saami Claims: Tracing the Political in the Finnish Forestry Industry. Geographical Research, 45, 2, 167-176. Lund-Thomsen, P., & Lindgreen, A. (August 01, 2014). Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Value Chains: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going?. Journal of Business Ethics, 123, 1, 11-22. Mette, A., & Tage, S.-L. (January 01, 2009). Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. Supply Chain Management: an International Journal, 14, 2, 75-86. Merminod, N., & Pache, G. (January 01, 2011). Supply management and corporate social responsibility: The challenge of global chain traceability. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 11, 3, 213-222. Ni, D., Li, K. W., & Tang, X. (December 16, 2010). Social responsibility allocation in two-echelon supply chains: Insights from wholesale price contracts. European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 3, 1269-1279. Pedersen, E. R., & Andersen, M. (August 01, 2006). Safeguarding corporate social responsibility (CSR) in global supply chains: how codes of conduct are managed in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Public Affairs, 6, 228-240. Rotter, J. P., Airike, P.-E., & Mark-Herbert, C. (December 01, 2014). Exploring Political Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Supply Chains. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 4, 581-599. Rotter, J. P., Airike, P.-E., & Mark-Herbert, C. (December 30, 2014). Exploring Political Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Supply Chains. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 4, 581-599. Tencati, A., Russo, A., & Quaglia, V. (August 09, 2008). Unintended consequences of CSR: protectionism and collateral damage in global supply chains: the case of Vietnam. Corporate Governance, 8, 4, 518-531. Wieland, A., & Handfield, R. B. (January 01, 2013). The socially responsible supply chain: An imperative for global corporations. Supply Chain Management Review, 14, 6.) Young, S. B. (January 01, 2015). Putting Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility at the Center of Capitalism through Better Valuation of Stakeholder Concerns. Read More