Engaging Youth in Constructive and Prolific Roles - Example

Report: Community Security Client Inserts His/her Name Client Inserts Grade Course Client Inserts Tutor’s Name 14/11/2011 Abstract This report presents a structure for, and recommendations as regards policy goals and benchmarks designed at engaging youth in constructive and prolific roles. It addresses the function of public policy in encouraging the youth to contribute to positive and creative roles accessible as one involvement to a national discourse on the well-being of youth and the policies that fortify them. Secondly, it offers the rationale of joint partnership of diverse community safety participants and the measures to be adopted for deterrent purposes. Thirdly it seeks to offer some vital remarks on the issues and problems immediate to the use of sporting and aptitude development schemes as vehicles of social policy in which the intention is to reduce levels of crime, delinquency and drug 'abuse' among young people. INTRODUCTION The twofold approach to the challenges of youth criminal engagements and community fire insecurity both for the country or state citizens and immigrants cannot be disregarded. There should be joint concerted efforts and collaborations of diverse stakeholders that aims to mitigate these problems. In Europe, as in quite a few other western frontiers, there has been over the last three or four decades mounting anxiety over what has been described as prevalent drug abuse amongst dreadfully huge numbers of youthful people' predominantly, concern has been articulated about the use of unlawful frivolous drugs such as cocaine and 'harder' drugs such as cannabis, as well as the scores of and various kinds of illicit behaviour said to be linked with drug use (Parker, Aldridge & Measham 1998). Consequently, pertaining to the community fire incidents, there should be an emergency management portfolio with the managerial function charged with creating the framework within which communities reduce susceptibility to hazards and cope with disasters. There must be agreed arrangements and procedures for the successful harmonization of their combined efforts. In this way the overall response of the emergency services will be greater than the sum of their efforts. To the benefit of the public, there are many serious and protracted occurrences which do not meet the criteria for a major incident but which would nonetheless warrant a harmonized effort from the services involved (LESLP 2007). These events have impacted on the emergency services and local authorities, and necessitated the implementation of special arrangements to administer these incidents. Clear benefits have been achieved from using the relevant aspects and thus guarantee the continuity of the synchronized approach to urgent situation cases. Experience has taught that there are many apparently harmless sets of conditions which can, if not dealt with speedily, spiral to the level of a major occurrence. To prevent is more desirable than to cure. No one will be criticised for treating an occurrence as serious in the first instance even if events afterwards prove it not to be (LESLP 2007). Emergency administration must give superior deliberation to deterrence and mitigation activities. Customarily, emergency managers have restricted their activities to developing emergency response plans and coordinating the preliminary response to disasters. Given the swelling risks facing communities, however, emergency administrators must become more progressive and tactical in their judgment. The role of the emergency supervisor can no longer be that of a technician but must advance to that of a manager and senior policy advisor who oversees a community-wide program to address all hazards and all phases of the emergency management cycle (William et al. 2000) LITERATURE REVIEW Among the generally illustrious sport-focused interventions designed to fight unlawful behaviour youngsters in United states are the so-called 'Midnight Basketball' programmes which were introduced in the 1990s. These programmes were designed to shrink crime and foil aggression by juvenile males (aged 16 to 25) in deprived inner-city urban areas prevalent with crime and youth delinquency by engaging them with basketball matches monitored at the so-called 'high crime' hours between 10.00 p.m. and 2.00 a.m. nevertheless, it is crucial that, albeit the intensification of, and victory claimed for, such schemes, there is miniature proof for their efficacy. And since they also lack any kind of lucid and evidence-based conjectural rationale, they embody, at best, 'an instantaneous, handy response to an apparent social quandary (Hartmann 2001). In Britain, comparable schemes that have sport in hearty have also garnered support from all of the key political parties as well as the educational services, police, youth probation and local authority workers and organizations with keen interest in promoting sport, as well as the national Sports Councils in the United Kingdom for instance Sport England. On this basis, such schemes have engrossed massive funding both from the government and charitable sector organizations apprehensive with the youth; at the point they are of fastidious significance in provisos of the British government's agenda on social insertion. Examples of such programs include the Positive Futures initiative launched as a joint partnership project linking Youth Justice Board, Sport England and the UK Anti-Drugs Coordination Unit wherein approximately 35,000 youth (72% male, 28% female) participated between 2000 and June 2003 (Ramella 2004). A vital policy goal of the enterprise is to employ sport and misdeed and drug use amongst 10-16 year olds in local neighbourhoods; 20 percent of the most dispossessed areas in Britain. It ought be noted that, as the Home Office has constantly beckoned, the Positive Futures agenda 'is not a conservative "diversionary" or sports advancement project'; rather 'a relationship stratagem in which these various schemes are 'used to institute relationships with socially marginalized youth who are estranged from officialdom and "authority" figures such as parent, teachers and even probation officers. subsequently, the program 'is not concerned with the celebration, growth or endorsement of sport as an end in itself, nor is it fretful with offering sports and physical activities as a diversion from, or substitute to, 'time spent engaging in substance exploitation and misdemeanour rather, sport, it is said, 'is just a hook, a means of building rapport with marginalized groups’ such as youth and it is the degree to which they shape relations with others on the system — in particular, the programme head (Ramella 2004). A latest impact account on the Positive Futures programme affirms that there is petite proof recounting to Positive Futures' impact on wider patterns to societies where programs are based' and that advance study is essential to better comprehend thriving delivery and the intricacy linked with the lasting affairs involving projects and individual participants (Ramella 2004). Nonetheless, few critical worries need to be resolved before we can hope to determine more precisely the efficacy of the Positive Futures project. For instance, it isn’t obvious from the report how we are to quantify -if that were feasible- the relationships youth shape with others on the scheme and more generally within the wider society. What criterion ought to be applied in this analysis? The length youth involved have to have established a 'relationship' with others for the project to be considered successful? Are these affairs probable to be durable? For it is the nature of people's particularly, the youth networks of relationships frequently change as they advance in years; some relations with acquaintances will stay put whereas others will turn out to be less important in their lives. This is principally imperative when one considers relationships the youth are expected to outline with venture heads and others on the scheme are, in most cases, only provisional. definitely, such slam one-to-one relationships with the project leader are predominantly complex to ascertain an all-encompassing schemes; furthermore chiefly hard to realize on those schemes that are interim and which have a high proceeds of both project staff and volunteers over and above the youth themselves. It is essential to elucidate these questions since, until they are resolved, it will be particularly tricky to gauge the efficiency of such projects and the possible enduring impact that participating in them will have on the young people’s lives. in the summer of 2000 and 2001, a further chief project, the Summer Splash/Splash Extra scheme, was brought forth on the helm of the Youth Justice Board and delivered by local authorities in a number of the largely dispossessed neighbourhoods and Britain cities. The objective of this proposal was to lessen street crime and theft by younger generation scrupulously by those considered largely at danger of committing crime by providing sport and arts activities for 9-17 year olds throughout holidays. It has been estimated that 91,000 youngsters participated in 296 programmes of this kind all through the summer holidays at a cost of £8.8 million from National Lottery monies Approximately 2.5 million hours of activity were delivered, at a cost of around £2.60 per youngster hourly on the basis of the total scheme expenditure. Transversely all ten areas where in the Summer Splash schemes were delivered, there was an overall decline in the misdemeanour rate of 5.2 percent between July and September (DCMS 2002). Security measures and procedures In case of a major incident, a joint concerted effort of emergency services which may include the involvement, either directly or indirectly of massive people might assume such elements as follows: The transportation and salvage and of massive casualties; The all-encompassing resources of the Fire Brigade, Ambulance Service, police, and; The support mobilisation and organisation of the emergency services; for example, local authority, to cater for the intimidation of fatality, grave injury or homelessness and; The management of a outsized quantity of investigation likely to be generated both from the public and the news media usually made to the police. Notwithstanding the fact that what is a major incident to one of the emergency services may not be so to others, each emergency services will attend with suitable encoded response. This is so albeit they are to be employed in a stand-by capacity and not directly drawn in. Stages of procedural approach to major incidents Generally, major incidents can be deemed to have these four stages: The initial response; The consolidation phase; The recovery phase; and The restoration of normality. An examination into the origin of the incident, jointly with the attendant hearings, may be superimposed onto the whole structure (LESLP 2007). Stages of a Major Incident Main functions of the emergency services and other supporting agencies: Police The principal areas of police duty at a major occurrence are: the co-ordination of the emergency services; the saving of life jointly with the other emergency services; the investigation of the incident and obtaining and securing of evidence in conjunction with other investigative bodies where applicable; the collection and distribution of casualty information; local authorities and other organisations acting in support at the scene of the incident; to secure, family liaison protect and preserve the scene and to control sightseers and traffic through the use of cordons; the prevention of crime; and temporary measures to reinstate normality after all required actions have been taken (LESLP 2007). Fire Brigade Monitoring and management of hazardous materials and protecting the environment; life-saving through search and rescue; maintain emergency service cover throughout and return to a state of normality at the earliest time. Fire fighting and fire prevention; salvage and damage control; detection, identification; safety management within the inner cordon; and to rendering humanitarian services (LESLP 2007). Ambulance Service The chief areas of responsibility for the Ambulance Service at a major incident may be summarised as: To save life jointly with the other emergency services; to provide appropriate transport; to provide treatment; medical staff, equipment and resources; to establish an effective triage sieve and triage sort system to establish the priority evacuation needs of those wounded and to establish a safe locality for casualty clearing, i.e. triage sort area; to provide a focal point at the incident for all National Health Service (NHS) and other medical resources; to maintain emergency cover throughout the LAS area and return to a state of normality at the earliest time; stabilisation and care of those injured at the scene to nominate and alert the receiving hospitals from the official list of hospitals to receive those injured and inform the other agencies; to provide communication facilities for NHS resources at the scene, with direct radio links to hospitals, control facilities and any other agency as required; to provide transport to the incident scene for the Medical Incident Officer (MIO), mobile medical/surgical teams and their equipment; to arrange the most appropriate means of transporting those injured to the receiving and specialist hospitals;; and to act as a portal into the wider health services as well as the Health Protection Agency Regional Health Emergency Planning Advisors, and in the incident of a chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear occurrence counsel on the convening of the Health Advisory Team (HAT), which will be proficient to advise and guide as far as health advice is concerned (LESLP 2007). Conclusion In this report I have sought to present several decisive solutions on the policy issues and problems contiguous the use of sporting schemes as drivers of social policy in which the rationale is to condense levels of misdemeanour, delinquency and drug 'abuse' amongst youth.. By doing so, I have attempted to show that there is little evidence of the effectiveness of such schemes in reducing drug use and crime. A major problem in this regard is that comparatively few 'sport in the community initiatives' have built in methodologies for monitoring their impact on levels of crime or drug use; as a result, it is hard to be sure about what impact, if any, they have on rates of crime or drug use. Moreover, the absence of any clearly articulated theoretical rationale for these schemes means that, even where success is claimed, it is unclear what specific aspects of the schemes account for that claimed success. On the other hand, matters pertaining to fire insecurity have been addressed in proactive manner, which I believe, if taken into account could serve as the guiding principle both to the citizens and immigrants. Social order, cohesion, harmony, and integration can only be achieved through concerted effort and consensus by relevant parties to play their role in order to curb any possible outcome of misfortune. Appendix: Case study- Problem Oriented Partnership (POP) work in action: Milan-Italy Throughout the last four months of 2010, there were 200 reported fire incidents, 75 involving immigrant workers, 92 cases of vehicle arsons, 33 houses burned caused by ruthless youth from the neighbourhood. Each incident is estimated to have cost $15000 in emergency services response, removal of the debris, and road repairs. Consultation with the fire service and the local police administration audit revealed that they anticipate a significant rise in the number of vehicle arsons and home fire offences and immigrant ignorance to safety precautions hence forth increased fire incidences. From the findings, these occurrences are prevalent during the early stage of the immigrant orientation to Italian procedure to security management, and on the other hand, youth crimes occur by a significant rate during school holidays. Further research identified that these incidents attacks occurred due to insufficient information to immigrants on how to handle fire gadgets and the precautionary procedure. On the other hand, the youth because of perverse upbringing ends up abusing drugs which are locally available thereby resulting to crimes. Moreover, Parents, schools, and the government were found to have failed to engage the youth to effective diversionary schemes to curb such incidents. The trigger factor to these attacks and occurrences are the avoidance of responsibility by relevant parties to contribute towards maximum community security. This problem was resolved by parties consenting to devise policies and a protocol with immediate effect that would eliminate ignorance and restore order and sanity to the community at large within 14 days. Immigrant fire scenarios, youth crimes at above sites have now been eliminated. The surrounding area has benefitted by an average of 75% reduction in diverse problem areas. List of References Department of Culture, Media and Sport 2002. Culture can Cut Crime Says Tessa Jowell, press release. [Online] Available at: [Accessed on 13 November 2011]. London Emergency Services Liaison Panel. Major incident procedure manual 7th ed. [Online] available at: [ Accessed on 13 November 2011]. Parker, H., Aldridge, J., and Measham, F., 1998. Illegal Leisure. London: Counselling Project Final Evaluation Report. Sheffield: Sheffield University. Hartmann, D., 2001. 'Notes on Midnight Basketball and the Cultural. Ramella, M., 2004. Positive Futures Impact Report: Engaging with Young People. London: Home Office William L., and Waugh, Jr., 2000. Living with Hazards, Dealing with Disasters: An Introduction to Emergency Management.Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe. Read More